Hi all.
Due to the demise of the Sixxs project, which I was using to bypass the
ISP’s filtering of port 25 (in/out), I would like to open a "private" port
on postfix.
It’s a non-standard port and I will be filtering the src range at firewall
level so I’m pretty confident there will be no abuse.
I
@domain1.com get relayed
correctly, other mail go to default smtp
Is my goal achievable and I'm worng at the configuration?
It's a bad idea?
Thanks
Andrea
2016-08-20 23:40 GMT+02:00 Andrea Cappelli <a.cappe...@gmail.com>:
> Hi All,
> I have a postfix 2.9.6 setup on Ubuntu 12.04 which serve a bounch of local
> mailbox and act as mail gateway with a tcp transport
>
> I want to use some external authenticated MTA based on sender
/virtual/domains.cf
virtual_mailbox_maps = proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/virtual/forwarding.cf,
proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/virtual/mailbox.cf
virtual_transport = dovecot
virtual_uid_maps = static:5000
Thank you
--
Andrea Cappelli
on = yes in order to use the correct
identitication to the next-hop host.
perhaps i can use the output of the sender_dependent_relayhost selection as a
key to select a trasport and then specify the grouping as you suggest as
wilcard in *that* transport ?
Andrea
On Thursday 03 March 2016 13:09:42 Andrea Borghi wrote:
excue me, i forgot.
Using Postfix 2.11.3-1 as distributed with debian jessie (stable)
Andrea
-enabled host so i need to respect the 3.1.1
requirement on said RFC. For all other requirement i have a solution and
currently my system works as expected only if the handled message has only one
recipient.
Andrea
different from domain.com
if /.*xxx\.yyy\.zzz\.www/
!/.*(Ff)rom.*\@domain\.com.*/
reject This seems spam!
endif
Second rule seems to block every mail even from domain.com.
How can I do what I want?
I want some IP able to send mail just using some domains.
Thanks!
Andrea
.. but is there some way to avoid it? Is there a way to tell postfix
to avoid tls1 if delivery fails?
Thanks!
Andrea
a saslauthd problem but a postfix problem
2014-03-31 22:02 GMT+02:00 Andrea devnul...@gmail.com:
2014-03-31 21:52 GMT+02:00 Andrea devnul...@gmail.com:
2014-03-31 21:30 GMT+02:00 Patrick Ben Koetter p...@sys4.de:
Hae you tried PLAIN with auxprop only? Use gen-auth, a script from John
Jetmoore
2014-04-01 15:00 GMT+02:00 Viktor Dukhovni postfix-us...@dukhovni.org:
No, it is a Cyrus SASL configuration problem, Postfix is just the messenger
between Cyrus SASL and the SMTP client.
Perhaps testsaslauthd is not the right tool to test with, because
you're trying to use rimap, auxprop,
2014-04-01 18:43 GMT+02:00 Viktor Dukhovni postfix-us...@dukhovni.org:
One question we have not discussed is file permissions and chroot.
Yes I checked it: on the debian postfix is chrooted, on the centos not. It
seems everything ok, proof should be that if I remove auxprop and let just
with the first and if it fails to check
with the second one?
Thanks!
Andrea
2014-03-31 15:30 GMT+02:00 Patrick Ben Koetter p...@sys4.de:
Configure saslauthd for rimap and the SQL auxprop for MySQL.
Then expand pwcheck_method in smtpd.conf like this:
pwcheck_method: auxprop saslauthd
Thanks, that's what I did but it seems not working.
saslauthd only works, auxprop
2014-03-31 20:39 GMT+02:00 Patrick Ben Koetter p...@sys4.de:
Any log?
Sure,
with:
pwcheck_method: saslauthd
mech_list: PLAIN LOGIN CRAM-MD5 DIGEST-MD5 NTLM
Using IMAP account works.
When I change smtpd.conf with:
pwcheck_method: auxprop saslauthd
mech_list: PLAIN LOGIN CRAM-MD5 DIGEST-MD5
2014-03-31 20:57 GMT+02:00 Andrea devnul...@gmail.com:
Mar 31 20:52:32 smtps postfix/smtpd[14221]: warning:
unknown[192.168.0.42]: SASL LOGIN authentication failed: authentication
failure
Mar 31 20:52:32 smtps postfix/smtpd[14221]: unknown[192.168.0.42]: 535
5.7.8 Error: authentication
2014-03-31 21:30 GMT+02:00 Patrick Ben Koetter p...@sys4.de:
Hae you tried PLAIN with auxprop only? Use gen-auth, a script from John
Jetmoore, to create auth strings and telnet to the server.
p@rick
Yes, tried even now with help of gen-auth and testsaslauthd.
testsaslauthd works perfectly!
2014-03-31 21:52 GMT+02:00 Andrea devnul...@gmail.com:
2014-03-31 21:30 GMT+02:00 Patrick Ben Koetter p...@sys4.de:
Hae you tried PLAIN with auxprop only? Use gen-auth, a script from John
Jetmoore, to create auth strings and telnet to the server.
p@rick
Yes, tried even now with help
for inexistent domain on sender address?
This happens on both postfix 2.9.6-2 or 2.2.8-1.2
Thanks,
Andrea
2014/1/16 Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org
Andrea:
Anyone knows why this happens?
How can I force to have always 550 for inexistent domain on sender
address?
Postfix will ALWAYS reply 450 after TEMPORARY lookup error.
Doing otherwise would be a mistake.
Wietse
You mean
with Domain not found in both cases, but with 450 if
domain is registered and its DNS is down, and with 550 if domains doesn't
exist. I didn't check existence of domains because I associated Domain not
found with unexistent domain.
Thanks,
Andrea
recipient probe
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks,
reject_non_fqdn_recipient, permit_sasl_authenticated,
reject_unlisted_recipient, reject_unknown_recipient_domain,
reject_unauth_destination
Postfix is 2.9.6 on Ubuntu 12.04
Thanks
--
Andrea Cappelli
figure what?
Anyone has a similar issue?
--
Andrea Cappelli
Asidev s.r.l.
report. You can
delete your own text from the attached returned message.
The mail system
EOF
I forget to mention that I'm using postfix 2.9.3 on Ubuntu 12.04
--
Andrea Cappelli
Asidev s.r.l.
Il 11/09/2012 14:15, Wietse Venema ha scritto:
Basic Internet email: no whitespace before a header label. Wietse
Thank you for your support, now works as expected
Best regards
--
Andrea Cappelli
Asidev s.r.l.
wl.mailspike.net=127.0.0.[19;20]*-2
Thanks,
Andrea
Il 11/05/2012 14:35, /dev/rob0 ha scritto:
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 11:38:07PM -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 11:29:01 -0400, Rod K wrote:
Was wondering if anyone would be willing to share what DNSBL and
weights they are using
=127.0.0.[10;11]*2,
bl.spamcop.net, bl.mailspike.net=127.0.0.[2;10;11;12]*2,
b.barracudacentral.org, ix.dnsbl.manitu.net
postscreen_dnsbl_threshold = 2
Andrea
Il 04/05/2012 17:29, Rod K ha scritto:
Hi all,
Was wondering if anyone would be willing to share what DNSBL and
weights they are using
to support user migration, both in and out,
from my server, during migration there is a window in which the mailbox
is up on both servers
Thank you
--
Ing. Andrea Cappelli
Asidev s.r.l.
Viale Rinaldo Piaggio, 32 - 56025 Pontedera (Pisa) @CERFITT
Via Osteria Bianca, 108/6A 50053 Empoli (Firenze)
Tel
check the MX record (which is still pointing to the
other server) before check local mailbox.
It's possible? Or the are better way to accomplish this?
--
Ing. Andrea Cappelli
Asidev s.r.l.
Viale Rinaldo Piaggio, 32 - 56025 Pontedera (Pisa) @CERFITT
Via Osteria Bianca, 108/6A 50053 Empoli (Firenze
in main.cf, also blocks emails from certain senders?
Right now I have:
smtpd_restriction_classes = nofilter
nofilter =
permit
If I create a new class, eg. allchecks, do I need to list every single
*sender, *client and *recipient that I already have by default?
Thanks.
Andrea
Il 22/08/11 22:51, Fernando Maior ha scritto:
Andrea,
How did you look at the final delivered mail? Did you use cat or vi or
another text editor? Cause if you just try using a webmail or mail client
you may not be able to see those headers...
Hi,
I saw the headers opening the file delivered
, but instead I would that after address
translation (alias -- real mailbox) the mail is injected in the postfix
queue as a normal mail, or better let the address translation occur
before amavis step
Is this possible?
--
Ing. Andrea Cappelli
Asidev s.r.l.
Via Osteria Bianca, 108/6A 50053
.
If the same mail is sent directly to the real mailbox the headers are
added and the mail is moved to Spam directory through a sieve filter
Can anyone explain this behaviour?
--
Ing. Andrea Cappelli
Asidev s.r.l.
Via Osteria Bianca, 108/6A 50053 Empoli (Firenze)
Tel. (+39) 333 60 18 258 Fax. (+39
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 11:08 PM, Victor Duchovni
victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 12:20:40PM +0200, Andrea Ganduglia wrote:
Without transport_maps it doesn't works. If I set virtual_transport =
dovecot log returns relay=none
The virtual_transport setting
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 5:53 AM, Benny Pedersen m...@junc.org wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 23:34:54 +0200, Andrea Ganduglia wrote:
transport_maps = mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql_virtual_transport.cf
maildrop_destination_recipient_limit = 1
virtual_transport = virtual
doh :-)
virtual is postfix
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 4:01 PM, Benny Pedersen m...@junc.org wrote:
On Wed, 3 Aug 2011 09:56:35 +0200, Andrea Ganduglia wrote:
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 5:53 AM, Benny Pedersen m...@junc.org wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 23:34:54 +0200, Andrea Ganduglia wrote:
transport_maps = mysql:/etc/postfix
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
On 8/3/2011 2:56 AM, Andrea Ganduglia wrote:
If I set
virtual_transport = dovecot
outbound emails are always deferred.
I gave you the correct fix for this a few days ago: 587 submission.
I will try in few days
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:40 PM, Victor Duchovni
victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:34:54PM +0200, Andrea Ganduglia wrote:
This is not difficult, as long as you don't override postfix' default
behaviour with silly transport_maps that don't work.
Without
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 9:27 AM, Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
On 7/29/2011 4:40 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:34:54PM +0200, Andrea Ganduglia wrote:
This is not difficult, as long as you don't override postfix' default
behaviour with silly transport_maps
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
On 7/30/2011 3:23 AM, Andrea Ganduglia wrote:
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:40 PM, Victor Duchovni
victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:34:54PM +0200, Andrea Ganduglia wrote
Hi. I have a little issue with postfix and dovecot. Below you can find
my actual configuration, this works well if I use virtual_transport =
virtual but if I add those lines:
transport_maps = mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql_virtual_transport.cf
maildrop_destination_recipient_limit = 1
virtual_transport
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 7:05 PM, Jeroen Geilman jer...@adaptr.nl wrote:
On 2011-07-29 18:37, Andrea Ganduglia wrote:
my outbound traffic try to authenticate recipients and delivery fails
My god, why is this so complicated ?
You're adding extra transport maps to a transport that is already
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:04 PM, Jeroen Geilman jer...@adaptr.nl wrote:
On 2011-07-29 21:20, Andrea Ganduglia wrote:
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 7:05 PM, Jeroen Geilmanjer...@adaptr.nl wrote:
On 2011-07-29 18:37, Andrea Ganduglia wrote:
my outbound traffic try to authenticate recipients
...@domain.tld
endif
It doesn't work. Could you tell me some suggestions?
Thanks.
Regards.
--
Andrea Di Mario
SPEAKAGE
be used, but I'm not the admin of
the domain.com servers.
Thanks!
Andrea
Don't use FILTER for mail routing; it affects all recipients of a message.
Do use transport_maps entries to direct specific recipients to the correct
mail server.
# transport_maps
example.com smtp:[IP1]
u...@example.com smtp:[IP2]
I tried, but I have to know all addresses.
Or is it
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Carlos Mennens
Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 15:32
To: Postfix
Subject: Mail Statistics (OFF TOPIC)
Guys I apologize if this doesn't belong here but I did a 'Google'
to the others mail servers.
Thank you in advance
Andrea
hi all! I've a postfix server with a network table of around 100 IP addresses
(net/host), is there a way to explicitly permit the relaying to the Internet
from some of these IPs and others not?
thanks in advance.
Cuidar la naturaleza es vivir mejor...
Hi all! I'm trying to implement sid-milter with Postfix 2.7, but am having some
problems while trying to compile release 1.0 under RHEL 5.5 (x86_64) as shown
below, any ideas? otherwise, does anyone know where can I find an rpm package
for my distro?
Thanks in advance.
make[1]: Entering
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Uwe Dippel
Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2010 10:20
To: Wietse Venema
Cc: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: postfix unavailable at 5 minutes after the hour?
On
Thank you.
I just compiled 2.6.5 with it and wrote a little tcp server with
Net::Server. I can use it in transport_maps returning a string 200
snmp:my_mail_host
Andrea
Wietse Venema ha scritto:
Ralf Hildebrandt:
* Andrea Gabellini andrea.gabell...@telecomitalia.sm:
I already looked
return a
transport:destination value?
Thanks,
Andrea
--
There can never be a computer language in which you cannot write a bad
program.
Ing. Andrea Gabellini
Email
Ralf Hildebrandt ha scritto:
* Andrea Gabellini andrea.gabell...@telecomitalia.sm:
Hello,
I need to route emails that flow through my postfix/spamassassin gateway
to different hosts based on my own policy.
I think I have to use the transport mechanism, but I can't find any
lookup table
configuration 1) is the exact one, but how do I say to postfix that
domain is not local and to redirect it to the script (accepting all IPs)?
Thanks,
Andrea
2009/7/20 Andrea devnul...@gmail.com
*But* I have some problems.
1) If I set:
mydestination = mydomain.com, script.mydomain.com,
every mail I receive on script.mydomain.com isn't redirected to script,
and I receive *Recipient address rejected*: *User unknown in local
recipient table
*2
On Sat, 2008-09-06 at 08:27 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
Andrea Gozzi:
Hi all.
Some time ago I set up a spammers' trap in the way of a fake webmail
service where they can register for a free account.
Up until now I was just saving their details (name,current email,ip,..)
in a database
mail into Postfix.
Wietse
Via smtpd.
Andrea
ps: just as a curiosity, would it even be possible to restrict based on
IP if injected via sendmail?
On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 22:06 +0200, mouss wrote:
Andrea Gozzi wrote:
On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 13:03 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
It works, thanks.
I have one further question: how do I restrict access to postfix for any
user with @myfreemail.com account only from localhost (where the webmail
the webmail for myfreemail.com will have to be diverted to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] without telling the sender. To him everything will
look like it went well and the delivery was successful.
My question is: can I accomplish something like that with postfix (and
my current virtual domain setup)?
Andrea
60 matches
Mail list logo
