Victor Duchovni:
On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 11:27:44AM -0800, Nandini Mocherla wrote:
Hi
I was installing Postfix postfix-2.5.5 on Solaris. At the time of
compiling the Source with make I have defined the parameters (for changing
the default values of the following from /etc/ to /opt
Nandini Mocherla:
I have compiled it with the desired locations for all the parameters
mentioned in my email. Then with make install it prompted me for the
locations again and i have answered them changing the default ones.
Then it copied/updated all the required files to the specified
Nandini Mocherla:
make makefiles \
#AUXLIBS='-L/usr/mysql/lib/mysql -R/usr/mysql/lib/mysql -lmysqlclient
-lldap -lpcre' \
AUXLIBS=-lpcre \
#AUXLIBS=-lpcre \
Your make makefiles command ends with the # character
Wietse
Nandini Mocherla:
On 02/ 3/09 02:07 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Nandini Mocherla:
make makefiles \
#AUXLIBS='-L/usr/mysql/lib/mysql -R/usr/mysql/lib/mysql -lmysqlclient
-lldap -lpcre' \
AUXLIBS=-lpcre \
#AUXLIBS=-lpcre \
Your make makefiles command ends
Nandini Mocherla:
Your make makefiles command ends BEFORE THE #AUXLIBS LINE
You can't have shell comments in the middle of multi-line input.
Wietse
Thank You Wietse! I have removed that line and my make install
proceeded further but this time it terminated with a diffrent
Steven Redlich:
/http:\/\/baddomain.com\/uTnsub\//
There is no error with this PCRE pattern. It works as expected
on my (non-Redhat) machine.
% cat /tmp/x
/http:\/\/baddomain.com\/uTnsub\// foo
% postmap -q - pcre:/tmp/x EOF
http://baddomain.com/uTnsub/
foobar
EOF
Victor Duchovni:
[ Wietse is it safe to move queue files active - hold - incoming in
a short time? Could some recipients be delivered twice by two delivery
agents in parallel (both deliveries starting after the second incoming
to active transition)? ]
Each delivery agent holds a read
Victor Duchovni:
On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 12:24:23PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
Victor Duchovni:
[ Wietse is it safe to move queue files active - hold - incoming in
a short time? Could some recipients be delivered twice by two delivery
agents in parallel (both deliveries starting
Pablo Scheri:
Hi all!, I am new in the forum. Please excuse me for my bad English.
What I want to do is to set up a round-robin from the Postfix to various
exchange servers
| EXCH 1 (10.0.0.207)
Inet = Postfix |
| EXCH 2 (10.0.0.208)
Bj?rn Ruberg:
Pablo Scheri wrote:
[...]
The problem is that when I send mails to the postfix, for example 1000
mails, It routes 990 to one of the exchange (10.0.0.208) and 10 to the other
one (10.0.0.207).
I alter the order of the A records to see if it changes, but did not.
In
Wietse Venema:
[ Charset UNKNOWN-8BIT unsupported, converting... ]
Bj_rn Ruberg:
Pablo Scheri wrote:
[...]
The problem is that when I send mails to the postfix, for example 1000
mails, It routes 990 to one of the exchange (10.0.0.208) and 10 to the
other
one (10.0.0.207
Pablo Scheri:
Hi, thanks for the quick answerd, the DNS is a local Bind.
the command : $ postconf smtp_randomize_addresses
tells me YES
In the DNS Zone I define only one MX, and I set 2 A registries for that MX
name.
Now read my other reply. Look in the maillog file for the
IP address
Pablo Scheri:
It is strange but I think I am using the 10.0.0.207 server only when the mail
is get delayed.
This is the log for a mail sent to the 10.0.0.208 server (from 100 mails
received 98 mails):
What is the output from:
dig mx mx.trendargentina.com.ar
Wietse
Clodoaldo Pinto Neto:
The To: header I'm sending appears like this in the log:
Feb 5 21:27:03 centos5151155 postfix/cleanup[4595]: B1AD3FF9A7:
warning: header To:
=?utf-8?q?D=C3=A9ste_Sobrenome_Grande_P=C3=B4cas_da_Silva_=3Cclodoaldo=5F?=?
=?utf-8?q?pinto=40yahoo=2Ecom=2Ebr=3E?= from
To:
Clodoaldo Pinto Neto:
2009/2/5 Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org:
Clodoaldo Pinto Neto:
The To: header I'm sending appears like this in the log:
Feb 5 21:27:03 centos5151155 postfix/cleanup[4595]: B1AD3FF9A7:
warning: header To:
=?utf-8?q?D=C3=A9ste_Sobrenome_Grande_P=C3
Chris St Denis:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
First some background. What I am trying to do is write a script that
syslog can be piped into that will parse the maillog in real time and
insert the items into the database -- one row per queue ID (and possibly
one per
Carlos Horowicz:
Hello list,
I recently found out an unsolicited e-mail that caused high CPU
consumption by cyrus imap on different mailstores.
The poisoned e-mail has a structure of over 31.000 repetiions of these
4 lines in the header
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/html;
richard lucassen:
Apparently, this:
smtpd_client_restrictions =
reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net
reject_rbl_client list.dsbl.org
reject_rbl_client virbl.dnsbl.bit.nl
The above does RBL lookups (as requested by reject_rbl_client).
replaced by this:
smtpd_client_restrictions =
The DNS looks good. Can you give output for:
$ dig mx trendargentina.com.ar.
$ dig a mx.trendargentina.com.ar.
$ postconf | grep dns
The records that result in some kind of error while delivering to
the mx.trendargentina.com.ar machines. Something like:
$ grep '10\.0\.0\.20..:25'
Pablo Scheri:
dig mx trendargentina.com.ar.
Looks good...
postconf | grep dns
disable_dns_lookups = no
lmtp_host_lookup = dns
smtp_host_lookup = dns
It's using DNS
---
grep '10\.0\.0\.20..:25' /var/log/maillog | grep -v status=
No
With Postfix 2.5 I introdoced stress-dependent behavior in the SMTP
server, but this was left turned off by default.
I'm thinking of turning on some stress-dependent behavior by default
in Postfix 2.6, to make Postfix look better in stupid benchmarks
(just like in_flow_delay and
Noel Jones:
Wietse Venema wrote:
Something that will drastically cut the time per session:
smtpd_timeout = ${stress?10s}${stress:300s}
I would be concerned about sites that are chronically short of
smtpd processes with an inexperienced or inattentive admin.
Maybe 20s~30s rather than
Mumtaz Ali:
(set -e; echo [$i]; cd $i; make 'CC=gcc -Wmissing-prototypes
-Wformat -DUSE_SASL_AUTH -DUSE_CYRUS_SASL \ -I/usr/local/include/sasl'
update MAKELEVEL=) || exit 1; \
You mis-typed the make makefiles command. The is not supposed to be there.
Wietse
Wietse Venema:
smtpd_timeout = ${stress?10s}${stress:300s}
smtpd_hard_error_limit = ${stress?2}${stress:20}
I thought this was going to be easy, but the built-in default
values for these parameters are type int, and do not accept
the conditional expressions.
Either this means changing the way
Chris St Denis:
Anyway, on to the problems. How do I deal with log entries like this. A
queue ID is created, but nothing ever happens to it. There is no reject
Wietse
There was one valid recipient, but the mail transaction was not
completed. This could be a header_checks rule, or a network
mantra UNIX:
Feb 6 17:09:53 abc-host sendmail[11601]: n16N9rC7011601: from=root,
That is NOT POSTFIX.
Wietse
Daniel V. Reinhardt:
---Could there be a notification alert be sent via SMS or another
means to the administrator of the post server in question, stating
something is wrong with the server?
This could be implemented by configuring a logfile monitoring
program (swatch, logsurfer, etc.) to send
bharathan kailath:
hi al
the following surprise me because postfix rejected this message! sill it
Postfix rejected a RECIPIENT. Do not confuse a RECIPIENTS with MESSAGES.
Wietse
Feb 7 19:39:11 relay2 postfix/smtpd[19938]: BC5A2211EF: reject: RCPT from
Tony Demark:
Good day.
I am have spent spent some time trying to figure out if the following
Postfix config is possible and am hoping for some guidance.
Short Synopsis:
I would like to move some of my virtual domains to have their email
hosted via a Google for Domains account.
Tony Demark:
On Feb 8, 2009, at 2:31 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Tony Demark:
I would like to move some of my virtual domains to have their email
hosted via a Google for Domains account. While there are only a
handful of accounts, most of the accounts have many aliases and have
used
Tony Demark:
If the original server gets an email addressed to 'me-
foo...@example.com', I need the email to be relayed to
'm...@example.com', not 'me-foo...@example.com'.
/^(.+)(-.+)?...@example\.com$/$...@example.com
OK ... I think I got this figured out. It ended up that the
Jo?o Miguel Neves:
Good evening,
I recently enabled reject_unverified_sender in my postfix configuration,
but it seems like it fails when the server against which the sender is
verified uses greylisting. I've been getting log entries like (@ were
replaced by _AT_):
Feb 8 07:56:49 atlas
Quanah Gibson-Mount:
We currently use postfix as a part of our overall product, which means that
it ends up being packaged inside our own RPM (or deb, etc) packages, and
then redeployed when our product is installed. One thing I've noticed
about the postfix build system in this is that it
Victor Duchovni:
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 10:02:33AM -0800, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
You have not read PACKAGE_README.
This is really the answer. I missed this document, things should work fine
with it.
One minor nit in the document, it uses xargs to collect a file list for
tar,
Quanah Gibson-Mount:
--On Monday, February 09, 2009 12:57 PM -0500 Victor Duchovni
victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com wrote:
http://www.postfix.org/PACKAGE_README.html
And just to confirm, the steps here worked beautifully, thank you. :)
I did have to use an install root of /../
David Cottle:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
All,
I see this a lot in my mail.log (unknown):
Feb 10 20:38:28 server postfix/smtpd[21977]: connect from
unknown[72.4.168.106]
Feb 10 09:38:30 server postfix/smtpd[21977]:
Juergen P. Meier:
If everyone would use SAV, the ammount of SMTP traffic in the Internet
would *double*. I bet most heavy duty mailssystems don't scale double.
Go ahead and make my day. What is the basis for this claim?
Wietse
Xn Nooby:
I have been trying to figure out how to get Postfix to not append
localhost in to the From: field. I am sending email mostly between
two local users, using RHEL5/Squirrelmail/Postfix/Dovecot.
When I send an email from
user_...@schoolretail.local
to
Thomas Glanzmann:
Out: 220 erld671x.erlf.siemens.de ESMTP Postfix
In: EHLO erld603x.erlf.siemens.de
Out: 250-erld671x.erlf.siemens.de
Out: 250-PIPELINING
Out: 250-SIZE 104857600
Out: 250-VRFY
Out: 250-ETRN
Out: 250 8BITMIME
In: MAIL FROM:double-bou...@erlf.siemens.de SIZE=1191
jan gestre:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 7:44 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
David Cottle:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
All,
I see this a lot in my mail.log (unknown):
Feb 10 20:38:28 server postfix
Thomas Glanzmann:
I still don't get why postfix sends me a soft bounce to notify me that
I'm running out of diskspace.
Have you looked at the LOGFILE?
that softbounce and so on until I'm out of resources. Shouldn't postfix
detect that this is a tempfailure and do exactly nothing and retry a
Pablo Scheri:
Hi! I am not able to upload the files, I get a post error because
I am exceeding the 4 characters.
How can I send you the logs? May I upload them to rapidshare or
something like that?
You can upload to:
ftp://ftp.porcupin.org/tmp/random/
files uploaded there cannot
Pablo Scheri:
Wietse,
I am not able to access...
It is not a productive environment, there is no private information.
I upload it to http://rapidshare.com/files/196381965/postfix.rar.html
It works fine as long as you use an FTP client.
I see no hosts 10.0.0.207 etc. in your maillog file.
Thomas Glanzmann:
so what happened. erld671x is out of resources, it send an e-mail to
postmas...@erld671x.erlf.siemens.de but because it is horrible
misconfigured it sends that e-mail over its smart host which delivers it
back, which results in a tempfailure which again triggers an out of
Jo??o Miguel Neves:
Pawe? Le?niak escreveu:
Jo?o Miguel Neves pisze:
Charles Marcus escreveu:
Here's a link informing why indiscriminate use of SAV is bad, and what
it should be used for:
http://www.backscatterer.org/?target=sendercallouts
OK, I've finished reading and analyzing
Nate:
I noticed somebody wrote a patch for postfix-2.3.8. I'm not a C
programmer myself, so I'm not sure of it's quality or if this code
could be used or committed to the postfix source tree. Found at
http://preview.tinyurl.com/b87z44
You are welcome to apply this patch, but it will not
Can someone have a look at this patch for Postfix = 2.5? The patch
for Postfix 2.3 does not work because I had to add a SASL mechanism
filter feature.
Wietse
*** xsasl_dovecot_server.c.orig Sun Mar 16 19:09:04 2008
--- xsasl_dovecot_server.c Wed Feb 11 10:26:37 2009
***
G?ran H?glund:
virtual_alias_maps =
proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-virtual-alias-maps.cf,
proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-virtual-mailbox-to-alias-maps.cf
hash:/usr/local/mailman/data/aliases
As I suspected, you are mixing local alias syntax with virtual
alias syntax.
The two have
Silas Boyd-Wickizer:
Hello, I'm doing some experiments with a synthetic benchmark and
postfix. My current postfix configuration can deliver ~3000
msg/sec to 1000 virtual mailboxes; however, the system (16
core/4x4 AMD opteron) is ~90% idle. All logs and queues reside
Why do you believe
Urban Hillebrand:
Hello list,
is there a way to enforce TLS dependent on the sender domain?
Yes. Use check_sender_access and reject_plaintext_session.
Wietse
Background:
Many customers are using our SMTP infrastructure (opportunistic TLS is
active). Now one customer wants to
Petr Hude?ek:
Hi everybody!
I need add X-Envelope From: and X-Envelope To: into incoming mail from
envelope mail, no from head mail! I use Postfix and procmail. Can you help
me, please?
Use PREPEND actions in access maps.
http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_ACCESS_README.5.html
Victor Duchovni:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 08:33:35AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
is there a way to enforce TLS dependent on the sender domain?
This would have to be simulated with sender_dependent_relayhost_maps.
Specify a Postfix instance that encrypts all outbound mail. Postfix
Wietse Venema:
Yu (Irvin) Fan:
Hi,
We're building a box to run two postfix instances to receive and send high
volume of emails. According to the documentation it's better to run the two
instances on separate disks for performance reason. I'm trying to understand
how exactly does
Gerardo Herzig:
Wietse Venema wrote:
Gerardo Herzig:
Hi all. Im want something for throtling msgs, say if user X sends more
than 10 emails/minute, then requeue next msgs from user X with some
lower priority.
Postfix has no queue priotity. When the street to the airport is
congested
Henri Chevreton:
Feb 13 14:25:37 alty postfix/master[3972]: warning: process
/usr/lib/postfix/local pid 19045 killed by signal 6
That is your problem.
Wietse
Eddy Beliveau:
Hi!
I'm using Postfix 2.5.4 and it worked well. Thanks ;-)
One of my academic user received this error message
Google didn't help me much
Do you know what can cause this failure ?
Is it cause by my server ?
Reporting-MTA: dns;bay0-imc3-s4.bay0.hotmail.com
Carver Banks:
Hello Everyone,
I am seeing weird bounces on my postfix server and can't quite figure out
why...
It looks like it is failing while passing the mail off to a spam appliance,
but from the spam appliance side I see no record of the message. Also
Any ideas, I have a couple
Yu (Irvin) Fan:
Hi Wietse,
Thanks for the quick answer. Can I say that the postfix performance is
affected by small file read/write speed of the disk?
Many email messages small. Therefore performance is dominated by
rotational and seek latencies (absent a large persistent buffer
between the
George Forman:
Hi,I have created a main.cf.auth and linked it to main.cf in /opt/zimbra/p
-f.auth/conf directory.I am using alternate_config_directories to specify a p
-arent directory path, such as,alternate_config_directories = /opt/zimbra/pf.
-auth/confqueue_directory =
Carver Banks:
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
[mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Wietse Venema
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 10:57 AM
To: Postfix users
Subject: Re: Protocol error: host said: 250 2.0.0 Ok (in reply to DATA
command
James Homuth:
Feb 14 11:12:14 nova postfix/master[27805]: fatal: /etc/postfix/master.cf:
line 115: missing transport type field
What is line 115 of master.cf?
From the original message:
127.0.0.1:10025 inet n- n - - smtpd
#Line 115, per the log
James Homuth:
Feb 14 11:12:14 nova postfix/master[27805]: fatal: /etc/postfix/master.cf:
line 115: missing transport type field
What is line 115 of master.cf?
From the original message:
127.0.0.1:10025 inet n- n - - smtpd
#Line 115, per the log
Harakiri:
--- On Mon, 2/16/09, Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de wrote:
From: Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de
Subject: Re: postmap changed between 2.3.8 and 2.5.5
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Date: Monday, February 16, 2009, 8:00 AM
* richard lucassen
Erik Paulsen Skaalerud:
Hi.
Does postfix hold mails in queue if it cant contact any DNS server?
Yes. You may want to read up on email RFCs if you're concerned
about the handling of mail delivery errors.
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5321
Wietse
We just lost our fibre link
Erik Paulsen Skaalerud:
We just lost our fibre link (including all DNS resolution) and it
seems like many of our internal users get a 450 error with Recipient
address rejected: Domain not found.
That is because YOU configured Postfix to reject mail with
reject_unknown_recipient_domain.
Jon Drukman:
I read this page http://www.postfix.org/FILTER_README.html but I am
not having any luck getting my pipe set up.
I want to make it so all mail destined for a particular subdomain is
run through a script and then discarded.
For that, FILTER_README is not applicable (it delvers
Jon Drukman:
still getting this
to=in...@in.thismoment.com, relay=local, delay=0.05,
This mail is sent to LOCAL not PIPE. Your transport map is not working.
Wieste
Jon Drukman:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Jon Drukman:
still getting this
to=in...@in.thismoment.com, relay=local, delay=0.05,
This mail is sent to LOCAL not PIPE. Your transport map is not working.
$ cat transport
in.thismoment.com
Jon Drukman:
in...@in.thismoment.com: Recipient address rejected: User unknown in
local recipient table; from=jdruk...@gmail.com
USE relay_domains and relay_recipient_maps
NOT virtual_alias_*
NOT virtual_mailbox_*
NOT mydestination
Travis:
I recently started bouncing email because (it appears) I had a mixture
of space-indentation and tab-indentation on the multi-line $mydestinations
line.
Should postfix really be doing this? It seems straightforward to me
to treat all whitespace the same, and it would prevent a
Santiago Romero:
Wietse Venema escribi?:
default_destination_rate_delay (default: 0s)
The default amount of delay that is inserted between individual
deliv-
eries to the same destination; with per-destination recipient
limit
1, a destination is a domain
Quanah Gibson-Mount:
I've been running into a really odd (bizarre) problem with Postfix that
only seems to happen on Mac OSX 10.5 (leopard). I'm really at a loss to
explain why things break the way they do, but it definitely happens. I
thought maybe some folks on the list might have some
Aggelos:
I have the following question concerning setup for multiple domains on
the same host machine:
Let us say that in /etc/postfix/main.cf we have the following:
mydestination = a.domain.com, b.domain.com, c.domain.com
We have setup DNS so that all mx records for the above domains
Guy Story KC5GOI:
I received a error in my log watch report that I have not seen before and
just wanted to get a idea of what I am seeing. Based on a match from a
Google search back in 2004 it looks like a dirty disconnect could cause the
error message below. I snagged the entries in the log
The postconf command does not read master.cf, therefore parameters
such as transport_destination_recipient_limit parameters usually
don't appear in postconf output.
Wietse
Michel S?bastien:
Hi all.
I use LMTP transport to deliver mails into Cyrus and when asking
DSN success I got an action relayed.
Besides final delivery, LMTP is also used to deliver mail into
content filters. The advantage of LMTP is that the protocol reports
one end-of-message
Victor Duchovni:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 02:18:01PM -0500, Timo Sirainen wrote:
In some setups it's useful for authentication handling to know if the
connection is SSL/TLS secured. The patch below should tell this to
Dovecot. It compiles, but other than that I haven't yet tested it.
Timo Sirainen:
On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 14:32 -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 02:18:01PM -0500, Timo Sirainen wrote:
In some setups it's useful for authentication handling to know if the
connection is SSL/TLS secured. The patch below should tell this to
Dovecot.
Timo Sirainen:
On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 16:49 -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
It's basically the same thing as disable plaintext authentication,
except on a per-user (or per-domain, or per-source-IP-range) basis
rather than globally. There are probably some other use cases that I've
heard
Andre H?bner:
Hello,
i try to find further infos for anvil-service and how to use it.
In my Maillogs i see some statistics written by anvil but i do not
understand the plan to use anvil to do a client based session/request
control.
anvil is not a policy tool. It is a safty mechanism.
Ralf Hildebrandt:
... but then I didn't read the INSTALL document to see if something
changed fundamentally...
The error is:
[src/postmulti]
gcc -Wmissing-prototypes -Wformat -Wl,--as-needed -DUSE_TLS -DHAS_PCRE
-DHAS_CDB -DSNAPSHOT -DNONPROD -g -O -I. -I../../include -DLINUX2 -c
Manuel P?gouri?-Gonnard:
Hi,
I'm afraid I don't understand what the directive smtp_tls_CAfile does
exactly. According to postconf(5),
smtp_tls_CAfile (default: empty)
The file with the certificate of the certification authority (CA) that
issued the Postfix SMTP client
Harakiri:
Hi,
i have one specific sender domain which should be allowed to sent over
postfix servers, however this domain is not registered as MX or DNS.
Is there a way to exclude this domain from the reject_unknown_sender_domain
check? Maybe a whitelist for this setting or add the
Look for receive_override_options in the MASTER.CF file
examples of the FILTER_README documentation.
Wietse
Santiago Romero:
I case it happens again ... Where or what should I take a look? At OS
level (disk or network I/O, processes...) I didn't see anything before
the postfix restart...
Try ``strace -o filename -p pid'' or the equivalent for your OS.
Wietse
ericmason:
I had some issues with my mailbox storage drive this morning and Postfix
started bouncing messages with this message:
Command time limit exceeded: /usr/bin/maildrop
I see the timeout is configurable with command_time_limit, but don't see any
way to defer the message instead
Some systems try only one IP address per MX record (per the RFC
they assume that one name is one host; if one IP address is dead
so will the others).
Postfix does not distinguish between one MX record with many A
records, or many equal-preference MX records with one A record.
Wietse
Sriram Nyshadham:
Hello All,
I need help finding out what parameter overrides what out of
bounce_queue_lifetime and maximal_queue_lifetime. On our MTAs,
bounce_queue_lifetime = 0d and maximal_queue_lifetime = 5d. So,
according to the definition, when bounce_queue_lifetime is set
to 0
Ralf Hildebrandt:
* LuKreme krem...@kreme.com:
Postfix does not 'support' TLS at all.
I wouldn't say it that way. STARTTLS looks like TLS support, if you
ask me
It should work with Gnu TLS as well as with any other TLS library.
As far as I knwo it doesn't :)
A couple years ago,
Ralf Hildebrandt:
* Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org:
A couple years ago, Gnu TLS would exit the program (exit status 2)
instead of reporting an error to Postfix, so that Postfix could
switch to plaintext where appropriate.
http://www.postfix.org/TLS_README.html#build_tls
Should
Wouter van Marle:
On 2 Mar 09, at 23:09, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 10:44:21PM +0800, Wouter van Marle wrote:
Hi list,
From me a question that seems to be asked now and then here, but I
could
not find any answers even on whether this is possible in the first
Erik Morton:
Hello,
I've been following the Content Filter tutorial
(http://www.postfix.org/FILTER_README.html ) with little success.
Postfix logs ALL delivery attempts, successful or otherwise,
in the maillog file.
http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#logging
Erik Morton:
Thanks. I am running with -D (strace) and -v enabled and I'm not
seeing anything fatal or related to a pipe process.
So what does Postfix log when delivering mail?
http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail
Wietse
Ondrej Holecek:
hello,
is there a possibility to limit connection count for whole subnet?
when I have:
smtpd_client_connection_count_limit = 2
it limits each IP to max 2 connections, but when attacker has /24
subnet, he can easily create 508
connections
If the attacker has a botnet,
Kevin Bailey:
Today, about 80% of emails started getting bounced back with:
So we commented out the spamcop line... then we got
So we commented out the spamhaus line... then we got
Then we commented out the rfc-ignorant.org line and the mail is getting
through. So the restrictions line
Daniel L. Miller:
Does Postfix support variables (I suppose defined in main.cf) to be used
for internet addresses in master.cf? Example:
main.cf:
inbound_interface = 192.168.0.10
outbound_interface = 192.168.0.11
master.cf:
inbound_interface:25 inet n - - - - smtpd
Evelio Vila:
so I would like to modify the return_attribute to pass postfix only the user
part of the mail field.
See: man ldap_table | less +/result_format
Also, could several queries can be combined to form the desired result?
You can't make multiple queries per result.
Wietse
Victor Duchovni:
With OpenLDAP 2.4 it is possible to set the TLS properties for
a particular LDAP connection (not just global properties), and to
associate a new OpenLDAP managed TLS context for the connection via the
new LDAP_OPT_X_TLS_NEWCTX option.
Try this completely untested patch (it
A couple years ago there was a discussion about having Postfix SMTP
servers pause for several seconds at the start of each SMTP session,
and reject the session if the client speaks first. The idea was
that this is a sure sign that the client is a piece of crapware.
Although the idea of proactive
Kirk Strauser:
$ sudo /usr/local/www/data/bugzilla/email_in.pl /tmp/bugtest
This executes the command as ROOT. This test is invalid because:
Mar 4 09:46:31 web2 local[61974]: fatal: execvp
/usr/local/www/data/bugzilla/email_in.pl: No such file or directory
This executes the command as
1 - 100 of 13060 matches
Mail list logo
