Re: [ptxdist] CAN utils

Juergen Beisert wrote: Gary, On Dienstag, 11. November 2008, Gary Thomas wrote: Index: rules/canutils.in === --- rules/canutils.in (revision 9080) +++ rules/canutils.in (working copy) @@ -2,7 +2,6 @@ menuconfig CANUTILS

Re: [ptxdist] Local kernel trees (was Re: CAN utils)

Gary Thomas wrote: Wolfram Sang wrote: Hello Gary, Assume that I have a totally local kernel tree - how can I use this? Also assume that I don't [necessarily] need/want ptxdist to bother building my kernel. How can I configure things to work in this way? The current state of local kernel

Re: [ptxdist] Local kernel trees (was Re: CAN utils)

On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 07:40:58AM -0700, Gary Thomas wrote: Close, but I'm still fuzzy on a couple of details. * Why not just specify the whole kernel source path, rather than the [obscure in my mind] prefix + version. I have kernel source trees all over the place and having to rerun

Re: [ptxdist] CAN utils

Juergen Beisert wrote: Gary, On Dienstag, 11. November 2008, Gary Thomas wrote: Juergen Beisert wrote: On Dienstag, 11. November 2008, Gary Thomas wrote: Index: rules/canutils.in === --- rules/canutils.in (revision 9080)

[ptxdist] CAN utils

I'm trying to build the CAN utilities package and having trouble. Firstly, it seems to expect the [berlios.de] SocketCAN include tree, but nothing in the configuration points at that. Also, programs which are not selected by the configuration are still built, just not installed. Most

Re: [ptxdist] CAN utils

Gary, On Dienstag, 11. November 2008, Gary Thomas wrote: Index: rules/canutils.in === --- rules/canutils.in (revision 9080) +++ rules/canutils.in (working copy) @@ -2,7 +2,6 @@ menuconfig CANUTILS tristate

Re: [ptxdist] CAN utils

Gary Thomas wrote: I'm trying to build the CAN utilities package and having trouble. Firstly, it seems to expect the [berlios.de] SocketCAN include tree, but nothing in the configuration points at that. Also, programs which are not selected by the configuration are still built, just not

Re: [ptxdist] Local kernel trees (was Re: CAN utils)

Wolfram Sang wrote: On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 07:40:58AM -0700, Gary Thomas wrote: Close, but I'm still fuzzy on a couple of details. * Why not just specify the whole kernel source path, rather than the [obscure in my mind] prefix + version. I have kernel source trees all over the place and

Re: [ptxdist] Local kernel trees (was Re: CAN utils)

Wolfram Sang wrote: Hello Gary, Assume that I have a totally local kernel tree - how can I use this? Also assume that I don't [necessarily] need/want ptxdist to bother building my kernel. How can I configure things to work in this way? The current state of local kernel trees looks like