Hi,
On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 03:50:19PM +0100, Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia wrote:
> 2017-03-01 22:03 GMT+01:00 Alexander Dahl <p...@lespocky.de>:
> > Hei hei,
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 06:36:38PM +0100, Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia wrote:
> >> Is someone usin
Hei hei,
On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 03:50:19PM +0100, Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia wrote:
> Yes, indeed. Selecting the right kernel to start from is already a
> non-trivial task, given the plethora of options (we have at least:
> official Freescale/NXP kernels, community kernels, vendor kernels from
>
:38PM +0100, Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia wrote:
> >> Is someone using ptxdist with iMX6 based targets? I know phytec used
> >> ptxdist in the past but now they seem to be using Yocto instead.
We use PTXdist for an i.MX6Q based target. The toolchain we use is based
on OSELAS.Toolchain,
Hi Alexander,
Thank you for your answer.
2017-03-01 22:03 GMT+01:00 Alexander Dahl <p...@lespocky.de>:
> Hei hei,
>
> On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 06:36:38PM +0100, Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia wrote:
>> Is someone using ptxdist with iMX6 based targets? I know phytec used
>>
Hei hei,
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 06:36:38PM +0100, Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia wrote:
> Is someone using ptxdist with iMX6 based targets? I know phytec used
> ptxdist in the past but now they seem to be using Yocto instead.
We have a phytec i.MX6 dev board at work. They shipped a ptxdist
Hi all,
Is someone using ptxdist with iMX6 based targets? I know phytec used
ptxdist in the past but now they seem to be using Yocto instead.
Re. toolchain: Any recommended version of OSELAS.Toolchain? Best
settings to finetune for Cortex A9 + VFPv3 + NEON ?
Thank you,
Guillermo Rodriguez