Use puppet apply file.pp
Or don't deploy webapps with Puppet. That's probably a better idea.
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:32 PM, Douglas Garstang
doug.garst...@gmail.comwrote:
All,
Is there a way to tell puppet to run, but to skip/ignore resources with a
certain tag? The use case is tagging
I'm considering the opportunity of adding (basic) Solaris support to my
modules ( www.example42.com) but before starting I'd like to gather some
info about best practices and standards.
I've to admit that I've not a great working Solaris experience, so I
actually don't know how people use it,
Matthias Saou wrote :
try $name, that should do it, came in somewhere mid 2.6.x series
Yup, that was it!
Section $name can now be used to set default values in defined
resource types in the release notes :
https://projects.puppetlabs.com/projects/puppet/wiki/Release_Notes
Maybe I'm
Kevin,
I'm not sure I perfectly understand your setup but I reckon your problem
is that ...
Excerpts from linuxbsdfreak's message of Fri Jul 08 14:48:19 +0200 2011:
[...]
Following are the nginx/puppet.conf configs of loadbalancer01
Hello,
I have the same issue :
ssh_authorized_key
{
user-rsa-key:
ensure = 'present',
key = '***== user@servername',
type = 'rsa',
user = 'user',
require = File[/home/user/.ssh],
}
On my server it adds
Hi,
On 07/20/2011 02:29 PM, Hugo Deprez wrote:
key = '***== user@servername',
well, the issue is that you're not specifying the key, but the key +
keyname, which is not quite right.
Try ssh_authorized_key { user@servername: key = ==, ... }
HTH,
Felix
--
You
Doug,
We've been successful with software deployments and Puppet has done a
great job. We deploy to Tomcat, JBoss, Coldfusion and Apache web
sited. In some cases we've needed to tie in a shell script which were
nearly impossible to get right in Puppet. One of the keys to your
question was that
Nan - that is an interesting approach to call Puppet from Puppet.
I'll have to give that a try and experiment.
Thanks!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Puppet Users group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To
Hi Felix,
I try the following :
key = *BQfc62cpIMw==,
And it works !
Thank you !
Hugo
On 20 July 2011 14:37, Felix Frank felix.fr...@alumni.tu-berlin.de wrote:
Hi,
On 07/20/2011 02:29 PM, Hugo Deprez wrote:
key = '***== user@servername',
well, the issue
On 07/20/2011 04:43 AM, Matthias Saou wrote:
* The definition is in a generic module for which it does not make
sense to default the parameter to this calculated value.
Instead of passing in the port number you could pass
a template for its creation
node 'myvmhost' {
createvm { [
On 07/20/2011 04:43 AM, Matthias Saou wrote:
node 'myvmhost' {
createvm { [ 'vm01', 'vm02', 'vm03', 'vm04', 'vm05' ]:
# VNC Port 59XY for vmXY
vncport = regsubst($name, 'vm', '59'),
}
}
that looks like an interesting module.
are you planning to publish it?
Or, could I get
On Jul 20, 12:06 am, Al @ Lab42 lab42...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm considering the opportunity of adding (basic) Solaris support to my
Cool. Certainly that will make it easier on Solaris admins new to
puppet.
So let's begin with few points:
- What version?
I'm tempted to begin only with
I am hoping that someone could post a working example of how they use a
'define' has in a parameter string because I have been working on this for days
to no avail (and googling checking documentation on puppet foreman sites.
What I am trying to accomplish is to define things within foreman
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Rich Rauenzahn rraue...@gmail.com wrote:
I assumed this would have been fixed by 2.7.1, but it appears that
when we call the functions err(), warning(), etc., that they don't get
added to the report object, which we are using to generate nagios
alerts.
I'm
so as far as I'm concerned Solaris 11 and IPS can't happen soon enough.
Keep in mind you can do IPS in Solaris 10 now if you want. You'll
need to install the software and migrate your packages from SYS V
format to IPS which I believe the toolkit provides a script for.
Hi guys
I am running in to a strange problem, I have a bunch of puppet
modules and one of them has an exec which changes the root password
and there is another which runs mysql import command to import dump
file in to the database, the problem is both these exec are returning
the following error:
Interesting. I will definitely take a look at that IPS link, that could
make life a lot easier. I'd love to see what you've done, I'm sure it would
help me along as I work to smooth out our Solaris processes.
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 10:47 AM, deet somew...@gmail.com wrote:
so as far as I'm
Here are my Execs, sorry didnt pasted them in the first post:
exec {Retrieve dump:
cwd = /var/www/r,
command = /usr/bin/wget http://xyz.com/asc.sql;,
timeout = 360,
require=Class[subversion],
}
exec {Get db:
On Jul 20, 2011, at 1:29 AM, Michael Stahnke wrote:
Sorry for being late to the party I had to remember where I had
stashed those items.
I’ll take a look. Thanks.
--
Rob McBroom
http://www.skurfer.com/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Puppet
On Jul 19, 2011, at 7:58 PM, Eric Searcy wrote:
You should get a redundant LDAP setup as well as monitor whether your
authentication system is up.
Absolutely. You can’t imagine the number of things that will break if LDAP goes
away.
--
Rob McBroom
http://www.skurfer.com/
--
You received
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 2:00 PM, newguy aimanparv...@gmail.com wrote:
Here are my Execs, sorry didnt pasted them in the first post:
exec {Retrieve dump:
cwd = /var/www/r,
command = /usr/bin/wget http://xyz.com/asc.sql;,
timeout = 360,
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 11:00:51AM -0700, newguy wrote:
Here are my Execs, sorry didnt pasted them in the first post:
exec {Retrieve dump:
cwd = /var/www/r,
command = /usr/bin/wget http://xyz.com/asc.sql;,
timeout = 360,
Thanks Stefan, I tried executing the command from command line to
realize that mysql dump contains bad data, thats why this problem is
occurring, still have no clue about the mysqladmin command
On Jul 20, 12:57 pm, Stefan Schulte stefan.schu...@taunusstein.net
wrote:
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at
New puppet user here looking for a yay or nay on whether the current
design I've got is a good idea.
The main thing I'm trying to accomplish is to have a class that gets
applied to a production box and a testing box, where the only
difference between the two is the version of packages that get
So, I'm into templating. I *like* templating. What I *don't* like, of
course, is to have to use multiple, similar templates for different output
files. So, let's work a concrete example. Suppose I have a template
standard_profile.erb which looks like this:
install_typeinitial_install
Thank you for the valuable infos, I agree that differences are enough to
require a dedicated solaris subclass, to keep changes isolated and don't
fiddle with existing classes linux oriented.
The approach:
Custom packages using pkgadd, Solaris OS packages using pkgutil, OpenCSW
using pkgutil.
On Wednesday, July 20, 2011 5:24:05 PM UTC+2, deet wrote:
On Jul 20, 12:06 am, Al @ Lab42 lab4...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm considering the opportunity of adding (basic) Solaris support to my
Cool. Certainly that will make it easier on Solaris admins new to
puppet.
Hope so. My
Hello, I was wondering if anyone can spot the mistake I am making in
the file-fragments pattern below. I am assembling the sudo file using
fragments, with a validate check file step that confirms if the
assembled file is valid. The '/etc/sudoers' file should only be
overwritten if the check
28 matches
Mail list logo
