On Sunday, March 11, 2012 10:38:11 AM UTC+1, Heltem wrote:
I am really interested in cornice.
Any news about it and next release ? Roadmap ?
We should cut a release soon-ish.
We don't have any formal roadmap, you can have a look at
I am really interested in cornice.
Any news about it and next release ? Roadmap ?
Le mercredi 21 décembre 2011 11:24:51 UTC+1, Tarek Ziadé a écrit :
Hey,
I guess this is the proper place for this kind of announcement ...
= We've released Cornice 0.6
Cornice provides helpers to build
We should remove it altogether. Iirc this is not used anymore.
On Jan 3, 2012 11:16 AM, Alexis Métaireau ale...@notmyidea.org wrote:
Le 03/01/2012 08:55, Robert Forkel a écrit :
i'm trying to use cornice to add an API to an existing pyramid
application, but i'm not sure whether this is an
i'm trying to use cornice to add an API to an existing pyramid
application, but i'm not sure whether this is an inteded use case.
Right now this is made difficult by things like the registration of a
static view at 'static' in cornice's 'includeme' (because it
overwrites a view my base app already
oops. fat-finger.
Should cornice be only used for standalone apps?
regards
robert
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Robert Forkel xrotw...@googlemail.com wrote:
i'm trying to use cornice to add an API to an existing pyramid
application, but i'm not sure whether this is an inteded use case.
Right
Having a way in cornice to define resources sounds nice and useful,
However, part of what you're doing with the code you submitted is
already handled by what we've done in cornice (https://github.com/
mozilla-services/cornice/blob/master/cornice/service.py#L87) we could
for instance deal with a
On Wednesday, December 21, 2011 2:59:01 PM UTC-8, Gael Pasgrimaud wrote:
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 11:18 PM, Tarek Ziadé ziade...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 11:00 PM, Gael Pasgrimaud ga...@gawel.org
wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Tarek Ziadé
On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 2:02 AM, Wyatt Baldwin
wyatt.lee.bald...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2011 2:59:01 PM UTC-8, Gael Pasgrimaud wrote:
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 11:18 PM, Tarek Ziadé ziade...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 11:00 PM, Gael Pasgrimaud
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Robert Forkel xrotw...@googlemail.comwrote:
One more thing which bothered me when looking at the Service
implementation: Why the 'acl' parameter and not a full context
factory? I'm playing with cornice to add an API to an existing webapp,
so I already have
Hey,
I guess this is the proper place for this kind of announcement ...
= We've released Cornice 0.6
Cornice provides helpers to build document REST-ish Web Services
with Pyramid.
This version has:
- multiple bug fixes
- a Paster template to quickly start a new Cornice project
- a tutorial a
On 21 December 2011 21:24, Tarek Ziadé ziade.ta...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey,
I guess this is the proper place for this kind of announcement ...
= We've released Cornice 0.6
Cornice provides helpers to build document REST-ish Web Services
with Pyramid.
Perfect! I'd just decided to try
Following the tutorial did not work for me using pip, but worked fine
using easy_install (distribute).
It was done with Python 2.7 in a virtual environment created with
--no-site-packages.
(The pro-Pip people claim that problems encountered with Pip are due to
authors not setting things up
On Wed, 2011-12-21 at 12:17 -0600, Steve Schmechel wrote:
Following the tutorial did not work for me using pip, but worked
fine using easy_install (distribute).
It was done with Python 2.7 in a virtual environment created with
--no-site-packages.
The error message doesn't seem to show
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 7:17 PM, Steve Schmechel shma...@gmail.com wrote:
Following the tutorial did not work for me using pip, but worked fine
using easy_install (distribute).
It was done with Python 2.7 in a virtual environment created with
--no-site-packages.
(The pro-Pip people claim
On Wed, 2011-12-21 at 21:09 +0100, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
I guess it's fine here, unless Chris and other people managing the
Pylons/Pyramid project think it's innapropriate, in that case I could
create another one.
No it's fine here to me, glad to see it being discussed!
- C
--
You
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Tarek Ziadé ziade.ta...@gmail.com wrote:
We'd love feedback new contributors !
Looks like a clever way to build some APIs. I have a project where I
may switch to cornice. But I have a few questions.
First, are you planning to add a support for class based
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 11:00 PM, Gael Pasgrimaud g...@gawel.org wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Tarek Ziadé ziade.ta...@gmail.com
wrote:
We'd love feedback new contributors !
Looks like a clever way to build some APIs. I have a project where I
may switch to cornice. But I
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 11:18 PM, Tarek Ziadé ziade.ta...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 11:00 PM, Gael Pasgrimaud g...@gawel.org wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Tarek Ziadé ziade.ta...@gmail.com
wrote:
We'd love feedback new contributors !
Looks like a clever
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 11:59 PM, Gael Pasgrimaud g...@gawel.org wrote:
Here is a proof of concept (can be improved)
http://friendpaste.com/4MnSHaRPkNU9RCtHkd4ggU
I like it -- I think it solves a problem I had with using a bunch of
functions - having to keep some globals around.
If you want
Maybe I used the wrong term in pinning. Or maybe the tutorial
should be a special case.
Say I write some code today that relies on Cornice version 0.6
and it works splendidly. Then in a few weeks/months I decide to
write something similar with Cornice version 0.6 (assuming that
is still the
On Wed, 2011-12-21 at 21:03 -0600, Steve Schmechel wrote:
Maybe I used the wrong term in pinning. Or maybe the tutorial
should be a special case.
Say I write some code today that relies on Cornice version 0.6
and it works splendidly. Then in a few weeks/months I decide to
write
Just curious, did the idea of separate indexes for current and
development versions go away?
I remember:
bin/easy_install -i http://dist.repoze.org/bfg/current/simple \
repoze.bfg
Was it too hard to manage the private indexes?
Pyramid has separate documentation for version 1.0, 1.1, 1.2,
On Wed, 2011-12-21 at 22:01 -0600, Steve Schmechel wrote:
Just curious, did the idea of separate indexes for current and
development versions go away?
I remember:
bin/easy_install -i http://dist.repoze.org/bfg/current/simple \
repoze.bfg
Was it too hard to manage the private indexes?
23 matches
Mail list logo
