Previously Eric Ongerth wrote:
I have heard that the more you try to make Javascript behave like
Python, the more you end up hating Javascript -- but that says nothing
about Javascript itself. Javascript is really a different language,
with different strengths. Perhaps the best plan is to
On 6 dic, 03:22, Eric Ongerth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But if you don't like Javascript, you have plenty of company.
Including myself somewhat recently before I studied it more thoroughly
and started trying harder with it ;-)
Well, I hope that any day Lua can be embedded in the browser. I'm
Previously Kless wrote:
On 6 dic, 03:22, Eric Ongerth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But if you don't like Javascript, you have plenty of company.
Including myself somewhat recently before I studied it more thoroughly
and started trying harder with it ;-)
Well, I hope that any day Lua can be
I was trying to make beaker work with database sessions like it was
described in the documentation.
This is the beaker confg:
beaker.session.type = database
beaker.session.sa.url = postgres://user:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5432/dbsession
beaker.session.table_name = db_session
I am not sure if i have to
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 3:39 AM, Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Previously Eric Ongerth wrote:
I have heard that the more you try to make Javascript behave like
Python, the more you end up hating Javascript -- but that says nothing
about Javascript itself. Javascript is really a
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 2:36 PM, Jorge Vargas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That said I really think a JS wrapper in JS is better than a JS
wrapper in python or whatever language for that matter. Any DSL which
is pretty much what all the libraries have become is way better than
having a half baked
Hi Marin,
This one bit me myself. You're looking for
beaker.cache.type = ext:database
in the config file.
If I remember correctly, Beaker creates the tables for you if they're missing.
Hope that helps!
Matt Z.
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 5:23 AM, Marin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was trying to
Comparison before starting a project, used to decide which framework
to use.
Django: according to http://groups.google.com/group/django-users/about
Members 12,016
Group Activity is High
Pylons: according to http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss/about
Members: 1,748
Group Activity is
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 10:39 AM, Ben Bangert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 6, 2008, at 9:31 AM, zunzun wrote:
Comparison before starting a project, used to decide which framework
to use.
Django: according to http://groups.google.com/group/django-users/about
Members 12,016
Group Activity
I'm thinking of pre-ordering the pylons book, and Amazon gives you the
option to get the sqlalchemy book at the same time. Has anyone red
the book? is it good? is is fairly recent or better yet how out of
date is it?
Thanks for any comments
Jose
I know there are still a number of Pylonistas out there in Windows
land who are stuck with a Python 2.5 installation because of the
current problem with simplejson. Here is a workaround that ended up
succeeding, without recourse to old versions or really anything too
suboptimal (except it
Hello all,
2008/12/6 Lawrence Oluyede [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 2:36 PM, Jorge Vargas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That said I really think a JS wrapper in JS is better than a JS
wrapper in python or whatever language for that matter. Any DSL which
is pretty much what all the
12 matches
Mail list logo
