Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm not sure whether you are requesting these for yourself or for
somebody else. If for somebody else, that somebody else should seriously
consider building Python himself, and publishing the result.
I'm requesting it for the many Boost.Python (heck,
David Abrahams schrieb:
I'm not sure whether you are requesting these for yourself or for
somebody else. If for somebody else, that somebody else should seriously
consider building Python himself, and publishing the result.
I'm requesting it for the many Boost.Python (heck, all Python 'C'
Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David Abrahams schrieb:
I'm not sure whether you are requesting these for yourself or for
somebody else. If for somebody else, that somebody else should seriously
consider building Python himself, and publishing the result.
I'm requesting it for
Dave Abrahams schrieb:
The only problem here is that there appears to be a lag in the release of
ActivePython after Python itself is released.
Is there any chance of putting up just the debugging libraries a little
earlier?
I may be out of context here: what is the precise problem in
Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dave Abrahams schrieb:
The only problem here is that there appears to be a lag in the release of
ActivePython after Python itself is released.
Is there any chance of putting up just the debugging libraries a little
earlier?
I may be out of
David Abrahams schrieb:
At the moment I have too weak a server to provide those files, but
that will change very soon. All that said, the Python and ActiveState
teams need to be aware of each and every Python release and go through
a standard release procedure anyway, whereas -- except for
Trent Mick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[Thomas Heller wrote]
Anyway, AFAIK, the activestate distribution contains Python debug dlls.
[Er, a month late, but I was in flitting around Australia at the time. :)]
Yes, as a separate download.
ftp://ftp.activestate.com/ActivePython/etc/
[Thomas Heller wrote]
Anyway, AFAIK, the activestate distribution contains Python debug dlls.
[Er, a month late, but I was in flitting around Australia at the time. :)]
Yes, as a separate download.
ftp://ftp.activestate.com/ActivePython/etc/
For years, Boost.Python has been doing some hacks to work around the
fact that a Windows Python distro doesn't include the debug build of
the library.
http://www.boost.org/libs/python/doc/building.html#variants
explains. We wanted to make it reasonably convenient for Windows
developers
David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For years, Boost.Python has been doing some hacks to work around the fact
that a Windows Python distro doesn't include the debug build of the library.
[...]
Having to download the Python source and build the debug DLL was deemed
unacceptable.
I'm
I vaguely recall that there were problems with distributing the debug
version of the MS runtime.
Anyway, why can't you do this yourself for all Boost users? It's all
volunteer time, you know...
--Guido
On 11/4/05, Charles Cazabon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[David Abrahams]
For years, Boost.Python has been doing some hacks to work around the
fact that a Windows Python distro doesn't include the debug build of
the library.
...
MS is recommending that we (Boost) start distributing a debug build of the
Python DLL with Boost, but Boost really seems
Guido van Rossum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I vaguely recall that there were problems with distributing the debug
version of the MS runtime.
Right: the debug runtime dlls are not disributable.
Anyway, why can't you do this yourself for all Boost users? It's all
volunteer time, you know...
Tim Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[David Abrahams]
For years, Boost.Python has been doing some hacks to work around the
fact that a Windows Python distro doesn't include the debug build of
the library.
...
MS is recommending that we (Boost) start distributing a debug build of the
Python
Bronek Kozicki [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David Abrahams wrote:
Who knows what the whiny babies will accept? That said, I think
people would be happy with a .zip file containing whatever is built by
selecting the debug build in the VS project and asking it to build
everything. (**)
Just to
David Abrahams wrote:
Who knows what the whiny babies will accept? That said, I think
people would be happy with a .zip file containing whatever is built by
selecting the debug build in the VS project and asking it to build
everything. (**)
I would go a step further than Tim: Send me (*) a
David Abrahams wrote:
Just to clarify - what we are asking for is library built with _DEBUG
and no BOOST_DEBUG_PYTHON, that is the one compatible with default
Python distribution.
I know you're trying to help, but I'm sure that's not making anything
clearer for these people. They don't
Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David Abrahams wrote:
Who knows what the whiny babies will accept? That said, I think
people would be happy with a .zip file containing whatever is built by
selecting the debug build in the VS project and asking it to build
everything. (**)
I
Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David Abrahams wrote:
Just to clarify - what we are asking for is library built with
_DEBUG and no BOOST_DEBUG_PYTHON, that is the one compatible with
default Python distribution.
I know you're trying to help, but I'm sure that's not making
David Abrahams wrote:
I would go a step further than Tim: Send me (*) a patch to msi.py (which
is used to build the distribution) that picks up the files and packages
them in the desired way, and I will include the files it outputs
in the official distribution. This is how the libpython24.a got in
20 matches
Mail list logo
