Re: [ql-users] QDT 1.01b release at QL is 21

2005-10-31 Thread Dilwyn Jones
Glad to see development is continuing. Just for good measure, the first release of Launchpad v2 should be there too! WMAN2 support (colour themes etc) and several new features. My wife and I will be staying there friday night too, so no doubt we'll meet some of you at the Ibis hotel. --

Re: [ql-users] SMSQE and the Qx0

2005-10-31 Thread Fabrizio Diversi
Ciao Wolfgang, I personally do not care absolutely about the smsq/e Rom version for my Qx0s, i do no see any reason why i should burn eproms all the times i upgrade my q60 smsq version , also because smsqe load perfectly into q60 ram in one second. I also vote for the Home extension included in

Re: [ql-users] The QL is an adult computer conference

2005-10-31 Thread Tony Firshman
On Mon, 31 Oct 2005 at 19:18:02, John Gilpin wrote: (ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Thanks Tarquin for your thoughts on the weekend, you've set the ball rolling. Has anyone else any comments to make? If it's been said before, then say it again so we know who feels which way about it. I personally

Re: [ql-users] SMSQE and the Qx0

2005-10-31 Thread Duncan Neithercut
Hi, I also find that it is easiest to load the latest version of smsqe to ram from a file. I think it is more useful to have an older version of smsqe in the rom - that is the version that came with it for the rare occassion when backwards compatibility is needed. Duncan Neithercut -Original

Re: [ql-users] SMSQE and the Qx0

2005-10-31 Thread David Gilham
I am also not bothered by having to load smsqe from disk. I have always loaded later versions of smsqe from harddisk after having assembled them from the sources. I do not think there will much of a demand for eproms anyway. Adding extra features to SMSQE in the long run will enlarge the size of