Hi everyone,
this email was sent to the users list on 30/09/09 21:59 but doesn't seem
to have arrived so here it is again.
Still hoping someone can help me with my BASIC problems.
Regards,
John Gilpin.
Original Message
Subject:Re: [Ql-Users] Help with
Original Message
Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] Help with BASIC/SBASIC WINDOWS
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 21:59:40 +0100
From: John Gilpin johngilpin...@btinternet.com
To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com
References: 4ac21f89.8050...@btinternet.com
It must be something to do with us editors being overworked, Dilwyn. I
almost did the same thing or didn't you notice there were two address
labels on your QUANTA Magazine this time (one on top of the other -
piggybacked if they were rom chips?) - perhaps the extra weight caused
the damage to
Thanks John :-)
Yes, you change addresses everywhat except for in your own database.
This is not the first time it has happened to me, sorry, Dilwyn.
Cheers Jochen
John Gilpin wrote:
It must be something to do with us editors being overworked, Dilwyn. I
almost did the same thing or didn't
I understand that there is no need to compile BASIC programs when
using
QPC2 (SMSQ) - the SBASIC code can be EXEC'd without TURBO or
QLIBERATOR.
Do I take this to mean that I just Ex win1_program_bas ?
And
if it's as easy as that, what are the benefits and drawbacks of
doing this?
John Gilpin wrote:
It must be something to do with us editors being overworked,
Dilwyn. I
almost did the same thing or didn't you notice there were two
address
labels on your QUANTA Magazine this time (one on top of the other -
piggybacked if they were rom chips?) - perhaps the extra weight
- Original Message -
From: SMSQ - Jochen Merz s...@j-m-s.com
To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com
Sent: Saturday, October 03, 2009 2:04 PM
Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] Tony Tebby article
Thanks John :-)
Yes, you change addresses everywhat except for in your own database.
This is not the first time
Op Sat, 03 Oct 2009 14:37:11 +0200 schreef John Gilpin
thegilp...@btinternet.com:
I understand that there is no need to compile BASIC programs when using
QPC2 (SMSQ) - the SBASIC code can be EXEC'd without TURBO or QLIBERATOR.
Do I take this to mean that I just Ex win1_program_bas?And if
On 3 Oct 2009, at 13:39, Dilwyn Jones wrote:
At last QL Today has arrived west of Chester and may I echo the
comments already made about the wonderful article by Tony Tebby.
Especially where he says he would never do it but apparently never
is 25 years. The story is finally told from the
QL Today has just arrived, today, in Edinburgh. In a week nor so
copies will have reached Iceland I suppose.
I hope they find Tony Tebby's fantastic article as amusing as I did.
And yet we are all still using QL's in one form or another.
George
Still using QLs is one thing.
The fact that a QL
John Gilpin schreef:
SNIP
Don't go away guys, this is just the beginning of my program review
(taking my old BASIC code from my Aurora/SGC set-up and running it on
QPC2), I am certain to need your help again later.
And just to prove this point, can anyone guide me on the following:
I
Bob Spelten writes:
Op Sat, 03 Oct 2009 14:37:11 +0200 schreef John Gilpin
thegilp...@btinternet.com:
I understand that there is no need to compile BASIC programs when using
QPC2 (SMSQ) - the SBASIC code can be EXEC'd without TURBO or QLIBERATOR.
Do I take this to mean that I just Ex
Dear QLers,
My or our thanks for your expressions of sympathy and empathy on the passing of
long-time QLer Mel LaVerne, our father. That includes, but is not limited to:
Bill (Cable)
Francois (Van Emelen)
Herb Ann (Schaaf)
Jochen (Merz)
John (Impellezeri)
Tony (Firshman)
Urs (Koenig)
Doug
I wrote:
1 REMark Example of QUIT
2 REMark Using own error message
3 REMark by pjwitte 2009
4 :
100 addr = ALCHP(100)
110 erm$ = 'something got seriously buggered here..' CHR$(10)
120 POKE_W addr, LEN(erm$), erm$
130 er = BIN('1' BIN$(addr, 32)(2 TO))
140 REMark La di da
150 QUIT er
160
14 matches
Mail list logo
