I read that a while back and was somewhat intrigued !
150 MPH in a C5, I'd rather not thank you. My Honda Civic does about 120,
but not with me driving so there's no way I'd go that fast in a plastic
pram.
Mind you, the fastest I've ever travelled (on tarmac) was 175 MPH - on a
Honda CBR 1000
-Original Message-
From: Phoebus R. Dokos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 3:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ql-users] List etiquette. (Was: ms-users-and-smalltalk-list)
5. No matter how much you agree or disagree with Peter, you have to admit
that
I'm told that Lawrence tends to lurk on this list, so hopefully, he might
see this.
There is news that Minerva source is being 'opened' and I was wondering how
to get hold of it, and if it would be possible to put it on my QDOS
Internals web site as a download and/or as a full discussion with
Roy Wood Wrote:-
I don't know about the rest of you but I have always seen this list as
the cybernetic equivalent of the chat in the pub after a QL show.
Very much so, I agree totally. Except cybernetic pints don't quite taste
the same ;-))
There
are some groups of people earnestly
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002 at 09:40:31, wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Roy Wood Wrote:-
I don't know about the rest of you but I have always seen this list as
the cybernetic equivalent of the chat in the pub after a QL show.
Very much so, I agree totally. Except cybernetic pints don't quite taste
Tony Firshman wrote:-
I don't get cross at a choral concert if someone talks about the
weather. I cannot understand people getting hot under the collar about
all this and stamping feet. There is more to life.
Agreed. Lets all lighten up a bit..
Darren - where have you stashed your 500m
-Original Message-
From: Tony Firshman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 11:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ql-users] List etiquette. (Was:
ms-users-and-smalltalk-list)
Do you mean 'a real 68060 QL instead of emulators'
That is pretty mild I think,
One long straight road, with a kind half way along.
(Off road I hasten to add !!)
And the weather was, surprisingly fine, for Scotland.
Norm.
-
Norman Dunbar
Database/Unix administrator
Lynx Financial Systems Ltd.
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel: 0113 289 6265
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 09:14:38AM -, Norman Dunbar wrote:
Please don flame proof clothing before reading this !!
BEGIN RANT MODE
Bye bye then Peter.
I think your attitude sucks (to be quite brutally honest) but you have made
your choice to go, then so be it.
I think your hardware
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002 at 12:13:21, Norman Dunbar wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Do you mean 'a real 68060 QL instead of emulators'
That is pretty mild I think, or have I missed something.
Yep, that's the one. I just thought it was 'slanted' following on from the
recent discussions of the
Ok, then I apologise (he could be lurking) for the misreading.
Sorry Peter.
Regards,
Norman.
-
Norman Dunbar
Database/Unix administrator
Lynx Financial Systems Ltd.
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel: 0113 289 6265
Fax: 0113 289 3146
URL: http://www.Lynx-FS.com
-Original Message-
From: Richard Zidlicky
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 8:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ql-users] ms-users-and-smalltalk-list
[ND] I think your hardware posts are pretty tedious -
[RZ] but they are on-topic
Yes, I agree,
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Norman Dunbar wrote:
[ND] I think your hardware posts are pretty tedious -
[RZ] but they are on-topic
Yes, I agree, and didn't say that they weren't. However, there is a
ql-developers list for hardware ?
So, effectively, all the hardware stuff in ql-users *is* OT
-Original Message-
From: Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 2:22 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ql-users] ms-users-and-smalltalk-list
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Norman Dunbar wrote:
Well, hardware *development* has an appropriate group, but general
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Norman Dunbar wrote:
Also, if anyone feels any specialist lists should be set up (ql-advocacy,
ql-pubchat, ql-fetist anyone? ;) I run a listserver.
ql_fetist - interesting. What's one of them ? :o)
Argh, typo! ql-fetish... The way some people go on about the QL it's
At 02:25 ìì 7/2/2002 +, you wrote:
ql_fetist - interesting. What's one of them ? :o)
Probably me (sleep with my Aurora every night - Much to my wife's chagrin...)
Phoebus
Web-based chat coming soon - much better than the current board...
But then I wouldn't be able to read the messages as they arrive
throughout the day like I can with email. Our web access is monitored.
Ian.
-Original Message-
From: dexter
Sent: 07 February 2002 14:31
To:
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Web-based chat coming soon - much better than the current board...
But then I wouldn't be able to read the messages as they arrive
throughout the day like I can with email. Our web access is monitored.
That would be: better than the board
Can't telnet.
SSH? Please excuse my ignorance of that particular TLA :O)
-Original Message-
From: dexter
Sent: 07 February 2002 14:59
To: ql-users
Cc: dexter
Subject: RE: [ql-users] ms-users-and-smalltalk-list
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Web-based
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can't telnet.
SSH? Please excuse my ignorance of that particular TLA :O)
SSH is the Secure SHell. It's essentially telnet by SSL... All traffic is
encrypted both ways. Whenever you're telnetting to a Linux machine, SSH
does the same job
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 08:51:08AM -, Norman Dunbar wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Phoebus R. Dokos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 3:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ql-users] List etiquette. (Was: ms-users-and-smalltalk-list)
5. No
-Original Message-
From: Richard Zidlicky
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 3:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ql-users] List etiquette. (Was:
ms-users-and-smalltalk-list)
[ND] Peter's attitude was totally unacceptable in my opinion, and that of
those
At 02:59 ìì 7/2/2002 +, you wrote:
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Web-based chat coming soon - much better than the current board...
But then I wouldn't be able to read the messages as they arrive
throughout the day like I can with email. Our web access is
SSH is the Secure SHell. It's essentially telnet by SSL...
Ah, now SSL I have heard of.
Can't do anything like that without prior approval, and that requires a
business case. We're sewn (or should that be 'stitched'?) up tighter
than a really tight thing in a jar with the lid screwed on
Ian,
I can't even stop those stupid disclaimers being appended to all my
mails.
We are the same here. Our disclaimer is a bit stupid as well. It says 'This
email is intended only for the use of the addressees named above and may be
confidential or legally privileged. If you are not an
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Norman Dunbar wrote:
This email is intended only for the use of the addressees named above and
may be confidential or legally privileged. If you are not an addressee you
must not read it and must not use any information contained in it, nor copy
it, nor inform any
Yimply copy the QPC directory over to the D drive - assume C:\qpv2 to
D:\qpc2.
Copy the 'c:\qxl.win' file, or whatever you are using as a QL hard drive
over to D:\qxl.win as well.
Change the icon for QPC from C drive to D Drive. Right click, properties,
then edit the targe or command line and if
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002 at 14:31:08, Dave wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Norman Dunbar wrote:
Also, if anyone feels any specialist lists should be set up (ql-advocacy,
ql-pubchat, ql-fetist anyone? ;) I run a listserver.
ql_fetist - interesting. What's one of them ?
I read that a while back and was somewhat intrigued !
150 MPH in a C5, I'd rather not thank you. My Honda Civic does about
120,
but not with me driving so there's no way I'd go that fast in a
plastic
pram.
Mind you, the fastest I've ever travelled (on tarmac) was 175 MPH -
on a
Honda CBR 1000
Arnold Clarke wrote:
I have a hard drive with 750mb on C drive and 250mb on D drive.
I have QPC2v3 on C drive and I am short of space on C drive.
D drive is not necessary.
Question 1- can I remove the partition and if so how?
Yes, but you don't gain space by that because C will stay the
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tim Swenson suggested, inter alia, the following book when I
originally asked about books on computing:
The Elements of Programming Style Kernighan and Plaugher
I got it from the British Library and am attempting to devour it
in a month. But really, I need a
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 04:48:03PM -, Norman Dunbar wrote:
[RZ]If the general consensus (as you claim) is that more than 80% of talk on
[RZ]this list should be devoted to some M$ virus nonsense he won't be the
last
[RZ}one to quit.
Well, I never claimed 80%, or indeed any figures,
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 02:10:22PM -, Norman Dunbar wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Richard Zidlicky
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 8:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ql-users] ms-users-and-smalltalk-list
[ND] I think your hardware
Is there any elf producing compilers for qdos/sms ?
--
Michael Grunditz
System Software Engineer
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Office direct: +46 8 448 04 92
Office general: +46 8 448 04 50
Mobile: +46 709 54 61 54
Industri-Matematik International
Web: http://www.im.se
Dave sez -
BTW: I'm still QL-less... Scary huh?
Malcolm sez -
Well, if you ever visit England that can be cured :-)
John sez -
It can also be cured if you _prioritise_ (;) and that means coming to
Wales...!
One JM + Gold Card + Microvitec Cub Monitor + DD disks + all else necessary
Collect
- Original Message -
From: Malcolm Cadman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There is clearly a need for a document on virus handling ... when I get
time I will liase with you and we can put out an advice notice. Maybe
on your website.
Then whenever there is a problem with a virus we can refer to
Hi!
I couldn't read this list for 5 days or so, opened my email program, started
downloading..
horror, shocks: almost 200 emails of [ql-users] mailing list.
OK think positive, could be a good sign, ql world is alive.
But then..Half of it full with off topic emails (mainly virus talking).
Hi,
since many people asked me about them:
If I can get 20 orders for 64Meg 26x cards, the price will be 32.99 + sh
For H/S reader the price right now is 22$ each HOWEVER the H/S
readers are h/s only if you start the reader with a card inside (at least
on a PC... I havent tested them
At 09:44 ìì 7/2/2002 +, you wrote:
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, John Hitchcock wrote:
Ok... someone is going to mention 50/60Hz
I'm waiting. (:O(
I'm building a powered backplane which will take power from a switched
mode PSU. Such things as 50/60Hz and voltages won't be an issue.
Why
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Phoebus R. Dokos wrote:
Why don't you ask Nasta for a Q-Plane? or Tony for a M-Plane (not good to
re-invent the wheel)
I'm not making this for general sale. This is a one-off backplane with a
good quality SMPS and test points, that will allow me to do testing and
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002 09:14:38 -
Norman Dunbar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please don flame proof clothing before reading this !!
BEGIN RANT MODE
I think your attitude sucks (to be quite brutally honest) but you have made
your choice to go, then so be it.
it sucks if certain people don't
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002 21:24:38 +
Malcolm Cadman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED]
uk, Norman Dunbar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Please don flame proof clothing before reading this !!
BEGIN RANT MODE
Snipped :-)
END RANT MODE
A lot of your 'rant' needed to said.
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002 10:40:28 +
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The I'm not playing anymore attitude is great when you're seven years
old, kinda wears out after that.
Guess what? Some people have grown up, need to go to work and don't have
the full day to filter a grain of ql info out of
At 11:25 ìì 7/2/2002 +0100, you wrote:
The fact is: Off topic emails are breaking the rules of this list, see above.
Peter (and a lot of others) are the victims, please don't forget that.
Converting the victims into gulty ones is perversion.
Although I don't think that anyone wants to turn
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002 at 22:54:42, Dave wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Phoebus R. Dokos wrote:
c. We create a couple of separate lists like for example: Ql-chat... This
way everyone's happy and we don't have too much trouble
Which is what I just did.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002 at 23:40:42, Tony Firshman wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002 at 22:54:42, Dave wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Phoebus R. Dokos wrote:
c. We create a couple of separate lists like for example: Ql-chat... This
way everyone's happy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002 09:14:38 -
Norman Dunbar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please don flame proof clothing before reading this !!
BEGIN RANT MODE
I think your attitude sucks (to be quite brutally honest) but you have made
your choice to go, then so be it.
I thought I would chime in here on the current topic of the mailing
list. In keeping with the style
RANT ON
I find a lot of the traffic on this group to be not really worth my time to
read. The delete key is my handy little friend and I use it often after
skimming the subject line.
At 07:51 PM 2/7/2002 +, you wrote:
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tim Swenson suggested, inter alia, the following book when I
originally asked about books on computing:
The Elements of Programming Style Kernighan and Plaugher
Here's a link that has a summary of the lessons in the book.
Seen this price???
http://www.ecost.com/ecost/shop/detail.asp?dpno=965874
Is this a good $$$ today???
--
Paul Holmgren
Hoosier Corps #33, L-6
2 57 300-C's in Indy
On 7 Feb 2002, at 22:39, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I couldn't read this list for 5 days or so, opened my email program, started
downloading..
horror, shocks: almost 200 emails of [ql-users] mailing list.
OK think positive, could be a good sign, ql world is alive.
But then..Half of it
Richard,
it was approximately 80% of trafic the last few days and you were
defending this practice, simple conclusion.
An incorrect conclusion then.I wasn't defending anything.
I was giving my opinion thet Peter over reacted. I haven't got time to count
up all the emails, so I'll take your
52 matches
Mail list logo
