On Mon, 8 Apr 2002 10:50:20 +
Bruce N [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Forwarded on behalf of Wolfgang..
Hi all,
I've has some trouble getting Prowess to work on my Q60. Roy
also had some problem with this.
He had problems with printing out of Linedesign on a Q40 IIRC.
This is now
On 14 Apr 2002, at 15:35, Claus Graf wrote:
Don't you use the extension by Mark that traps those commands and handles them right?
Umph.
Obviously not.
I know, RTFM...
Wolfgang
-
www.wlenerz.com
Forwarded on behalf of Wolfgang..
Hi all,
I've has some trouble getting Prowess to work on my Q60. Roy
also had some problem with this.
This is now solved for me - I downloaded the latest version of the
binaries from Joachim's site (www.progs.be), and this worked
nearly straight out of the
On Thu, 7 Mar 2002 20:17:32 +0100, Claus Graf wrote:
Hi Fabrizio,
I was also disappointed to see Thierry's free.fr sites down.
This is a problem with my ISP, I don't know why but all my web
sites are currently unavailable on free.fr. I sent email to
the support about 1à days ago and I'm
On Sun, 10 Mar 2002, Thierry Godefroy wrote:
This is a problem with my ISP, I don't know why but all my web
sites are currently unavailable on free.fr. I sent email to
the support about 1à days ago and I'm still waiting for a
reply... I guess one of their server upgrade went wrong...
I am
I notice that the Q60 and specifically D D Systems got a good
mention on page 75 of the 7/3/02 issue of Micro Mart magazine. Good
news - if Micro Mart can bring themselves to do this, then surely
other computer mags could too.
--
Dilwyn Jones
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does someone know what happen to Thierry web sites ?
I am not able to access both smsq.free.fr and linux
one.
I need to download linux kernel for my q60 , my old
q40 Linux kernel crash the q60.
I just received my q60 that now is up and happily
running with smsqe under my desk and near my old q40
Does someone know what happen to Thierry web sites ?
I am not able to access both smsq.free.fr and linux
one.
Look at
http://wwwusers.imaginet.fr/~godefroy/english/index.html
Robert
At 06:53 ðì 7/3/2002, you wrote:
Does someone know what happen to Thierry web sites ?
I am not able to access both smsq.free.fr and linux
one.
I need to download linux kernel for my q60 , my old
q40 Linux kernel crash the q60.
I just received my q60 that now is up and happily
running with smsqe
Hi again...
I've received a couple of emails from people, and it's made me a bit
worried. People are asking me if they should hold off the purchase of an
upgrade, or Q60, based on something that may be released in the future.
Not I, not anybody, knows when things will be released. When they
Hi Dave,
I've received a couple of emails from people, and it's made me a bit
worried. People are asking me if they should hold off the purchase of an
upgrade, or Q60, based on something that may be released in the future.
[...]
Thanks for recognizing this problem.
People holding off decisions
Peter Graf wrote:
To start off with some news, I have the pleasure to announce that the
Q60
series production is now up and running!
The waiting is over, thanks to Dennis Smith and Derek Stewart, who
run DD
Systems.
Although the possible user base seems very small, and is already
partially
It's not only the peripherals that are re-used - in fact, everything but a
part of the PCB slightly larger than the size of the PGA package is reused.
The PCB was designed that way, it has distinct areas that can be
re-designed as needed. By now it must be obvious why :-)
Any chance of a
On Mon, 24 Sep 2001 at 10:21:23, Malcolm Lear wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
It's not only the peripherals that are re-used - in fact, everything
but a
part of the PCB slightly larger than the size of the PGA package is reused.
The PCB was designed that way, it has distinct areas that can
Roy Wood wrote:
[ULTRA GOLD CARD announcement Nov./Dec. 1997]
...
This was not a competitor to the Q 40 but a direct response to
Qubbesoft's announcement of the Goldfire.
At least the *timing* when the announcement appeared was directly related
to the Q40. Goldfire specs had been announced
Nasta wrote:
When it finally materialized (somehwere around the time the Aurora
became available) I already had plans to do a SGC successor because
it was clear Miracle was pulling out of the QL market.
You must have had a lot of insider knowlegde about Miracles policies.
After I announced the
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Peter Graf
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
SNIP
It was in Nov./Dec. 1997, after I announced the Q40 in summer, and showed a
prototype in fall. Looking back, it sounds amusing, but back then I was
scared that my work had been almost useless, and considered to give up.
Nasta wrote:
You are right, i should have been more precise, the QXL WAS the closest
hardware
And NOW it is the Q40/Q60, isn't it? ;-)
When it finally materialized (somehwere around the time the Aurora
became available) I already had plans to do a SGC successor because
it was clear Miracle was
On 9/22/01 at 2:44 PM Peter Graf wrote:
You are right, i should have been more precise,
the QXL WAS the closest hardware
And NOW it is the Q40/Q60, isn't it? ;-)
Oh, yes, definitely. The Q40/60 is definitely the closest type of hardware,
for several reasons. For instance, the GF IO chips
Nasta wrote:
This doesn't sound very good. My best wishes that your personal situation
may become better!
Actually, I am sorry to say, it got signifficantly worse just a few days
ago - WTC and Pentagon attack spillover...
:-((
Yes. One of them is going to be finished very soon, too, the
On 9/20/01 at 10:27 PM Peter Graf wrote:
Yes, the original idea behing the GoldFire was to use the
QXL version of SMSQ as the basis for it, as that is the
closest related hardware.
I don't think so. The Q40 is *much* nearer to your earlier announcement
than the QXL. Think about memory map,
Nasta wrote:
Yes, the original idea behing the GoldFire was to use the QXL version of
SMSQ as the basis for it, as that is the closest related hardware.
I don't think so. The Q40 is *much* nearer to your earlier announcement
than the QXL. Think about memory map, interrupt structure, screen
Nasta wrote:
Thanks for that info. The 68060 cleverly provides a thermal sensing
resistor on chip, so at least temperature can be conclusively measured.
I see that you know what I mean ;-)
First, there have been some impressive figures posted on the Q60 web site
about the power consumption.
On 9/19/01 at 11:20 PM Peter Graf wrote:
Nasta wrote:
Thanks for that info. The 68060 cleverly provides a thermal sensing
resistor on chip, so at least temperature can be conclusively measured.
I see that you know what I mean ;-)
Well, the most recent look into the 060 manual was more a
Not entirely on-topic... and probably a question for Peter Graf:
The Q60, AFAIK uses either a 66MHZ 68060 or a 75MHz (clocked at 80MHz)
68LC060. My question is: were any tests conducted with clocking the 66MHZ
regular 060 at a higher clock, and if so, what were the findings? 68k CPUs
are know to
Hi Nasta,
Not entirely on-topic... and probably a question for Peter Graf:
I'd say fully on-topic! You talk about QL hardware, and I am sure it is one
of the purposes of this list.
The Q60, AFAIK uses either a 66MHZ 68060 or a 75MHz (clocked at 80MHz)
68LC060.
Almost. The 66 MHz version is a
On 9/18/01 at 10:20 PM Peter Graf wrote:
I'm not sure my first reply got through, this new NT virus is bombarding my
web server which also has the proxy program, until it eventually crashes.
[Overclocking a 68060]
The Q60, AFAIK uses either a 66MHZ 68060 or a 75MHz (clocked at 80MHz)
68LC060.
Richard wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 06:22:26PM +0200, Wolfgang Lenerz wrote:
On 13 Sep 2001, at 22:28, Thierry Godefroy wrote:
I wonder what this instruction is as none of the beta-testers had
reported any crash so far...
I thought you were gone for a long time, so didn't send you
On 12 Sep 2001, at 20:50, Peter Graf wrote:
Just in case you refer to the MOVEP instruction:
No, it's the instruction that disables external interrupts.
The 68060 has no MOVEP. Just read the docs on your support disks, and use
the MOVEP-emulation software. All the crashes you reported to
On 13 Sep 2001, at 22:28, Thierry Godefroy wrote:
I wonder what this instruction is as none of the beta-testers had
reported any crash so far...
I thought you were gone for a long time, so didn't send you this
info already. The offending instruction is:
INIT_SCHD MOVE.B#1,$FF10
frequently used programs and data loaded in at boot time.
Ian
-Original Message-
From: pgraf
Sent: 12 September 2001 19:51
To: ql-users
Cc: pgraf
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Q60
Hi Wolfgang,
like you I feel deep sympathy to the americans. I hope nobody
on this list
has lost
Hi all,
I've recently had some time to play around with my all new Q60.
I'm very happy with it, it is a nifty beast.
This also gave me the opportunity to test the CD driver. Indeed, I (of
course) waznted to get my usual setup also going on the Q60. Sp I
copied my QPC QXL.WIN fimle to a CD
Hi Wolfgang,
like you I feel deep sympathy to the americans. I hope nobody on this list
has lost friends or relatives.
I've recently had some time to play around with my all new Q60.
I'm very happy with it, it is a nifty beast.
Nice to hear.
I had to change one instruction in the ATAPI
On Wed, 12 Sep 2001 at 20:50:55, Peter Graf wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
like you I feel deep sympathy to the americans. I hope nobody on this list
has lost friends or relatives.
I know someone in Credit Suisse who worked in one of the towers. They
were near the ground and escaped.
--
Tony Firshman wrote:
On Wed, 12 Sep 2001 at 20:50:55, Peter Graf wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
like you I feel deep sympathy to the americans. I hope nobody on this list
has lost friends or relatives.
I know someone in Credit Suisse who worked in one of the towers. They
were near
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Peter Graf
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Hi Malcolm,
So the operating system on a Q60 is SMSQ ( in ROM ? ), which is loading
a complied version of Linux optimised for SMSQ ?
What is the actual sequence of a Q60 startup ?
QDOS/SMSQ boots from ROM. That takes just a few
On 10 Jun 2001, at 21:23, Peter Graf wrote:
BTW if you want to run a QDOS application while using Linux on a Q60, you
can use a special version of UQLX. Unlike emulators on a PC it can run QDOS
programs native on the 68060, which is of course a lot faster.
Does that run QDOS classic or
Hi Malcolm,
So the operating system on a Q60 is SMSQ ( in ROM ? ), which is loading
a complied version of Linux optimised for SMSQ ?
What is the actual sequence of a Q60 startup ?
QDOS/SMSQ boots from ROM. That takes just a few seconds. If you just want
to use QDOS/SMSQ, here you are.
If you
On 20 Mar 2001, at 22:20, Peter Graf wrote:
128 MB RAM / 60 GB for example. But it wouldn't make sense.
And let us pray that it never will
Wolfgang
Peter Graf wrote:
Marcel wrote:
Dilwyn Jones wrote:
He he, I love Claus Graf's signature...never thought we'd see the
time
when we started throwing these sorts of figures around in SMSQDOS!
I
just hope the Q60 does see the light of day...as good as the
emulators
are I doubt we'll get this
It would be a real shame to see all that hard work wasted. Is there any
possibility that the
complete design (Gerber files, PLD equations, schematics, etc.) could be
put on a web site
so anybody could get the PCB made up and buy in all the components.
Obviously this
would be an expensive route
: [ql-users] Q60
The only other solution would be to find a person or company that is
capable and willing to produce the Q60 *without* my involvement. *Maybe*
the Q60 might be interesting for other 68k markets. But I definitely have
no time for:
SNIP
42 matches
Mail list logo
