[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 24 April 2002 21:50
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ql-users] QeyMail question...
But it's not true about me and that sheep! ;)
You should ask Dilwyn about the sheep and the haystack !
I bribed you to stay quiet about that one, so I'll have the money back
rather careless in how I phrased it to Roy, I should have known
better
with Roy, the actual words I used were something like I injured my
back in an incident involving a sheep and a haystack...
How was the sheep (8-)#
Uninjured, uncaught and uncaring ;-))
--
Dilwyn Jones
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 25 April 2002 05:47
Subject: Re: [ql-users] QeyMail question...
On 24 Apr 2002, at 21:50, Dilwyn Jones wrote:
Guess I should have read Norman Dunbar's article about handling
stacks
properly in QReview
But it's not true about me and that sheep! ;)
You should ask Dilwyn about the sheep and the haystack !
I bribed you to stay quiet about that one, so I'll have the money back
with interest please ;-))
In case anyone wonders, a few years ago I injured my back on my
father's farm trying to help
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002 at 21:50:14, Dilwyn Jones wrote:
(ref: 000901c1ebdb$0307e9e0$d7065cc3@default)
But it's not true about me and that sheep! ;)
You should ask Dilwyn about the sheep and the haystack !
I bribed you to stay quiet about that one, so I'll have the money back
with interest please
On 24 Apr 2002, at 21:50, Dilwyn Jones wrote:
Guess I should have read Norman Dunbar's article about handling stacks
properly in QReview magazine at the time (there...back on topic in no
time at all!)
And how do yu explain the sheep in that context?
grin
Wolfgang
Users
Subject: [ql-users] QeyMail question...
Hi all,
I'd like to promote a discussion about the features of a QL-based email
program. I don't want to discuss standard features just yet, but those
exotic features that will really help us.
This email is intended only for the use of the addressees
the ability to accept PLAIN TEXT messages only. Maybe a bit
contentious, but
plain text *is* teh standard for emails - unlike what Little Willy
Gates
seems to think.
Agreed.
The ability to delete messages from the server before downloading
them,
based on a regular expression, so I can bin all
-Original Message-
From: Dilwyn Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Subject: Re: [ql-users] QeyMail question...
Africans who keep asking me to launder money for them
The good old 'Nigerian Scam'. This has been around from the early seventies
(I think) when it used to be done by snail
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Dilwyn Jones wrote:
the ability to accept PLAIN TEXT messages only. Maybe a bit
contentious, but
plain text *is* teh standard for emails - unlike what Little Willy
Gates
seems to think.
Agreed.
Agreed, but also not true. The RFCs show that the content type should
-Original Message-
From: Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Subject: Re: [ql-users] QeyMail question...
The RFCs show that the content type should be
included in the header, and may be anything, however the base email
should
be sent as text with the alternative content as an attachment
How about support for both POP3 and IMAP?
-Original Message-
From: Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 23 April 2002 15:24
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ql-users] QeyMail question...
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Dilwyn Jones wrote:
the ability to accept PLAIN TEXT messages only
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about support for both POP3 and IMAP?
POP3 support is trivial, and I have all the RFCs here. I don't have
documentation for, and have never personally used, IMAP, so it will come
second, but it will come.
The real intention behind this
By having a plugin filter rule system, we can also direct emails that
contain
this is not spam, !! and insert offensive words here can be
directed
straight to hell...
A few things not often found, but very useful to have in order to block
spam:
1) Delete messages without plain text (only
At 10:47 ðì 23/4/2002, you wrote:
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about support for both POP3 and IMAP?
POP3 support is trivial, and I have all the RFCs here. I don't have
documentation for, and have never personally used, IMAP, so it will come
second, but it will come.
I
On 22/04/02 at 19:13 Dave wrote:
I'd give an example of the sort of SBASIC syntax I'd like, but someone
would post how you already do it ;)
ip$ = RESOLVE(site$)
Well, I wish S*basic had long integers (would be a bit interesting to find
a character to append to a name to signify long,
For example, I've recently learned of the difficulty of moving files
between machines. Headers are a wonderful thing.
There could always be a QL specific type defined... basically a regular
file with the header included, distinguished from the ones without the
header included by some suitable
At 12:40 ìì 23/4/2002, you wrote:
By having a plugin filter rule system, we can also direct emails that
contain
this is not spam, !! and insert offensive words here can be
directed
straight to hell...
A few things not often found, but very useful to have in order to block
spam:
1)
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Tony Firshman wrote:
Sorry to lead you into a false confession (8-)#
It wasn't false! It was entirely genuine!
But it's not true about me and that sheep! ;)
You should ask Dilwyn about the sheep and the
Hi all,
I'd like to promote a discussion about the features of a QL-based email
program. I don't want to discuss standard features just yet, but those
exotic features that will really help us.
For example, I've recently learned of the difficulty of moving files
between machines. Headers are a
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Hi
I'd like to promote a discussion about the features of a QL-based email
program. I don't want to discuss standard features just yet, but those
exotic features that will really help us.
Email using tcp/ip ?
On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, Michael Grunditz wrote:
Email using tcp/ip ? Do you have a working stack ?
Well, tricky answer. SOQL, but this is all development work for the
EtherIDE interface I'm helping Nasta with. We'll be sending out a couple
of prototypes to people who are working on TCP/IP so we
At 02:13 ìì 22/4/2002, you wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Hi
I'd like to promote a discussion about the features of a QL-based email
program. I don't want to discuss standard features just yet, but those
exotic features that
On Mon, 22 Apr 2002 at 15:39:51, Dave wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Hi all,
I'd like to promote a discussion about the features of a QL-based email
program. I don't want to discuss standard features just yet, but those
exotic features that will really help us.
For example, I've recently
There is a working stack. However several facilities are missing. Among them:
PPP support and Name resolution.
Implementing name resolution cant that hard. I volunter.
uQLx has full TCPIP support for some years now and there are a couple of
email programs for the QL that can do the
At 03:12 ìì 22/4/2002, you wrote:
There is a working stack. However several facilities are missing. Among
them:
PPP support and Name resolution.
Implementing name resolution cant that hard. I volunter.
uQLx has full TCPIP support for some years now and there are a couple of
email
For example, I've recently learned of the difficulty of moving files
between machines. Headers are a wonderful thing. Would you prefer to
have
zip file attachments that are MIME encoded, or a proprietary
attachment
system that will allow you to transfer files with header info? (I
would
open up
On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, Tony Firshman wrote:
Well, less is more. Clive taught me that.
... but it is 'fewer'
Amazing the way English (and American I think) has lost good English
from Tony Blair through the BBC to schools.
people, features, bricks (discreet - ie countable) - many. fewer
On Mon, 22 Apr 2002 at 21:03:12, Dave wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, Tony Firshman wrote:
Well, less is more. Clive taught me that.
... but it is 'fewer'
Amazing the way English (and American I think) has lost good English
from Tony Blair through the BBC to
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Tony Firshman wrote:
Sorry to lead you into a false confession (8-)#
It wasn't false! It was entirely genuine!
But it's not true about me and that sheep! ;)
Dave
30 matches
Mail list logo
