On 19 Mar 2004 at 21:41, Tony Firshman wrote:
No thanks, I already look sheepish enough most of the time.
I thought you were more wolf like (8-)#
but in sheeps' clothes, of course...
Wolfgang
Hmmm, this subject is getting a bit 'woolly'. But I mutton't make
bad jokes about it. I expect
Hey - I'm willing to accept anything as payment - though preferably
only
sheep that have been slaughtered and carved up so I do not need a
new freezer...
--
Rich Mellor
OK, I'll test this by ordering a program from you. 20 best Welsh sheep
in the post to you tonight ;-)
--
Dilwyn Jones
In a message dated 20/03/2004 13:17:04 GMT Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hey
- I'm willing to accept anything as payment - though
preferablyonly sheep that have been slaughtered and carved up so I
do not need anew freezer... -- Rich
MellorOK, I'll test this by
- Original Message -
From: Dilwyn Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 20, 2004 12:05 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Re: Changing the subject
Hey - I'm willing to accept anything as payment - though preferably
only
sheep that have been slaughtered
In a message dated 19/03/2004 15:48:38 GMT Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It ties
in a bit with Geoff's comment about a 1000 pounds work
contract.Contray to Peter, I will always consider trying to sell my
programs, or at least some of them (I hasten to add that this has
On Fri, 19 Mar 2004 at 11:13:18, wrote:
This was Rich with bad attribute--^
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Agreed - the QL traders continue to support the QL mainly from a love
for the system and the people involved. The more disputes that arise
and the less people that buy any software, the
On 19 Mar 2004 at 16:54, Tony Firshman wrote:
Maybe we ought to resort to old fashioned sheep.
No thanks, I already look sheepish enough most of the time.
Wolfgang
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Wolfgang Lenerz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
SNIP
(Although, I don't know how much giving them a program to sell isn't a
poisend pill since, at least sometimes, it seems to cost more to
produce/upgrade etc, than the money they get from the sales).
Very true in some
Wolfgang Lenerz a écrit:
Contray to Peter, I will always consider trying to sell my programs, or at
least some of them (I hasten to add that this has nothing to do with SMSQ/E,
which is not mine).
For me, it is a question of commitment: if people buy my (or, indeed anybody
else's
On Fri, 19 Mar 2004 at 18:49:44, Wolfgang Lenerz wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
On 19 Mar 2004 at 16:54, Tony Firshman wrote:
Maybe we ought to resort to old fashioned sheep.
No thanks, I already look sheepish enough most of the time.
I thought you were more wolf like (8-)#
--
In a message dated 19/03/2004 16:57:40 GMT Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This was
Rich with bad attribute--^
Maybe... Or maybe I am just echoing the feelings of other traders and QL
users who long ago abandoned the scene
(ref:
[EMAIL PROTECTED])Agreed - the QL traders
On 19 Mar 2004 at 16:47, Wolfgang Lenerz wrote:
Contray to Peter, I will always consider trying to sell my programs, or at
least some of them (I hasten to add that this has nothing to do with SMSQ/E,
which is not mine).
I understand the point of commitment by paying for the software.
On 19 Mar 2004 at 16:47, Wolfgang Lenerz wrote:
Contray to Peter, I will always consider trying to sell my programs, or at
least some of them (I hasten to add that this has nothing to do with SMSQ/E,
which is not mine).
I understand the point of commitment by paying for the software.
On 19 Mar 2004 at 21:41, Tony Firshman wrote:
No thanks, I already look sheepish enough most of the time.
I thought you were more wolf like (8-)#
but in sheeps' clothes, of course...
Wolfgang
QBBS (QL fido BBS 2:252/67) +44(0)1442-828255
tony@surname.co.uk
14 matches
Mail list logo
