- Original Message -
From: John Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 28, 2005 4:57 PM
Subject: [ql-users] Jan Jones Book
John.
I am still, however, very intrigued that the QUANTA limited edition
states
that there is a Quanta copyright and not
On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 at 22:56:12, jms1 wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
- Original Message -
From: Tony Firshman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2004 9:51 AM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Jan Jones Book
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 at 23:46:11, jms1 wrote:
(ref
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 at 23:46:11, jms1 wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
From: Tony Firshman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
snip robots ignoring meta
Somewwhere I read that these programs check to see whether the web page
contains the meta tags and if not ignores them. I could be years
http://www.sincuser.f9.co.uk/048/qlink.htm
Membership is by subscription to the magazine
I do think I remember that very phrase from the dim and distant
past.
Would this have been the short lived SUB
Ah - I have now read that quote in context - it was used by IQLUG.
This page was written in
Most important is the bare text after body
That is what gets picked up in -all- my web site mentions, not the
META
tags (even 'description' seems ignored). I gather robots mainly
ignore
those now, as people were putting really stupid ones with a vast
number
of words.
It is vital to look at the
Dilwyn made the point that Quanta membership was based on a
subscription to the magazine.
Nothing could be further from the truth. The subscription is for
membership to Quanta, period.
Hmm, I must be mixing this up with another organisation. The sentence
membership is by subscription to the
Dilwyn Jones wrote:
Dilwyn made the point that Quanta membership was based on a
subscription to the magazine.
Nothing could be further from the truth. The subscription is for
membership to Quanta, period.
Hmm, I must be mixing this up with another organisation. The sentence
membership is by
Tony Firshman wrote:
snip
http://www.sincuser.f9.co.uk/048/qlink.htm
Membership is by subscription to the magazine
I do think I remember that very phrase from the dim and distant past.
Would this have been the short lived SUB
All the best - Bill
___
Dilwyn made the point that Quanta membership was based on a
subscription to the magazine.
Nothing could be further from the truth. The subscription is for
membership to Quanta, period.
Hmm, I must be mixing this up with another organisation. The
sentence membership is by subscription to the
Tony Firshman wrote:
snip
http://www.sincuser.f9.co.uk/048/qlink.htm
Membership is by subscription to the magazine
I do think I remember that very phrase from the dim and distant
past.
Would this have been the short lived SUB
All the best - Bill
Ah yes, the Super User Bureau. Newsletter produced
On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 at 18:36:52, Dilwyn Jones wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
There's a shop in Bangor called Quantum Leap Tattooing (how do you
spell that last word???). Wonder if I asked them to tattoo a QL on me
if they'd know what I meant???
Reminds me of the advert seen in a tattoo shop in
Fri, 24 Dec 2004 17:47:14 +,() Malcolm Cadman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /wrote:
I wonder what game you have got planned next ... ?
Hmmm... I dunno... maybe a port of Doom? ;-) (With sufficient speed now on
the new version of QPC (3.30 - another plug ;-) ) that will be possible in
most colour
Phoebus Dokos schrieb:
Hmmm... I dunno... maybe a port of Doom? ;-) (With sufficient speed now
on the new version of QPC (3.30 - another plug ;-) ) that will be
possible in most colour enabled platforms (QXL excluded... Q40/60 were
already capable)
... and with a multiplayer over lan option
Fri, 24 Dec 2004 19:46:32 +0100,() wolfgang mhlegger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /wrote:
Phoebus Dokos schrieb:
Hmmm... I dunno... maybe a port of Doom? ;-) (With sufficient speed now
on the new version of QPC (3.30 - another plug ;-) ) that will be
possible in most colour enabled platforms (QXL
Thu, 23 Dec 2004 18:58:59 +,() John Taylor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /wrote:
Quanta is regarded by the taxman as a self trading company, that is
to say it trades solely for the
benefit of its members, and thus it is not liable for tax on its
earnings from sales to them.
Are Quanta actually
On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 18:58:59 +, John Taylor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quanta is regarded by the taxman as a self trading company, that is
to say it trades solely for the
benefit of its members, and thus it is not liable for tax on its
earnings from sales to them.
Are Quanta actually
Thu, 23 Dec 2004 20:07:31 +,() Malcolm Cadman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /wrote:
snip
Yet being a member of Quanta isn't that bad :-) ... a small subscription
a year helps to oils the wheels a bit.
Oh I understand, but the problem is that all I can see is a bit of...
ermmm... kind of
17 matches
Mail list logo
