Re: [ql-users] dragdrop

2004-03-14 Thread Wolfgang Uhlig
Per wrote: I thought Id have a go just to demonstrate: 100 s = SCR_BASE + SCR_LLEN + 4 : rem Start at top left of screen 110 xs = 100: ys = 10 : rem X/y size 150 POKE_L a, $2200020: rem Mode 32 sprite w alpha channel Per, this is

Re: [ql-users] Menu_rext

2004-03-14 Thread Dent
Merz wrote: Per was referring to WIN and RAM ... and I tried it the way described and it worked fine - no directories listed, no crash. Wolfgang Lenerz wrote: It does crash here, though, as said in my second message... I just never used win, because I use dev It happended on

[ql-users] Re: [ql-users] 1000 to spend! (2nd attempt!)

2004-03-14 Thread Wolfgang Uhlig
Geoff Wicks wrote: This means that Quanta would have a sum of about £1,000 each year to spend on QL development. How should they spend this money? On march, 8th, Laurence Reeves answered:: 1000 pounds to the person who ports OpenOffice? ;) That seems like a lot of cash for what is a pretty

[ql-users] problem with the new C68 pieces for WMAN

2004-03-14 Thread Christopher Cave
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I have been using this new stuff from George Gwilt with no problem BUT I suspect that in my setup the old version of the library can still be found by the linker. Is it not possible to extract this module from the old library using ar and then stick it in the

[ql-users] Re: [ql-users] £ 1000 to spend! (2nd attempt!)

2004-03-14 Thread Dent
gwicks wrote: snip This means that Quanta would have a sum of about £1,000 each year to spend on QL development. How should they spend this money? snip Remember your subscription is your money, not Quanta's. How would you like them to spend it on your behalf? Geoff Wicks. Hi Take a

Re: [ql-users] £ 1000 to spend! (2nd attempt!)

2004-03-14 Thread Arnould Nazarian
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit: I was thinking on the subject of what next for the QL. I think we really need something that acts like a web browser. This means the display of text and graphics in the same viewer. There was an attempt a few years back at writing a web browser for the QL (from

[ql-users] Turbo

2004-03-14 Thread P Witte
Just thought I should mention something that might cause a few strange hiccoughs: Turbo Toolkit (TTK) comes in two different forms, one version for SMSQ/E and one generic version. The generic PEEK$ and POKE$ are a sub-set of SMSQ/E's PEEK$ and POKE$ and have therefore been ommitted in the SMSQ/E

[ql-users] Re: [ql-users] £ 1000 to spend! (2nd attempt!)

2004-03-14 Thread P Witte
Geoff Wicks writes: Remember your subscription is your money, not Quanta's. How would you like them to spend it on your behalf? In a way, hardware development is more deserving as hw developers have real outlays apart from spare time, ie their profit can go negative rather than just zero. But

Re: [ql-users] dragdrop

2004-03-14 Thread P Witte
Wolfgang Uhlig writes: I have two questions, though: 1) With the PVAL procedure (result%(10 and 11)) I can determine the origin of a window. How would I have to alter your line 100 when PVAL returns xorg%=500, yorg%=300 (just to take an example) As you will know by now, I sent you the

Re: [ql-users] Re: [ql-users] 1000 to spend! (2nd attempt!)

2004-03-14 Thread Lau
Wolfgang Uhlig wrote: Geoff Wicks wrote: This means that Quanta would have a sum of about £1,000 each year to spend on QL development. How should they spend this money? On march, 8th, Laurence Reeves answered:: 1000 pounds to the person who ports OpenOffice? ;) That seems like a lot of cash

Re: [ql-users] problem with the new C68 pieces for WMAN

2004-03-14 Thread James Hunkins
Actually, I believe that if you have both versions of the library available (your make file would have to include both), you would get notices of doubling defined items. I probably could extract this piece and move it over but am concerned that I have a piece that is old which is calling this.