[ql-users] Re: Re: [ql-users] Re: [ql-users] Re: [ql-u sers] Re: £ 0.00 to sp end! (1st attem. ..

2004-03-18 Thread Tony Firshman
On Thu, 18 Mar 2004 at 06:59:20, Wolfgang Lenerz wrote: (ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) On 17 Mar 2004 at 16:39, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I do however wonder what version DD supplies with their machines?? If they are not supplying the latest version, then they would seem to be selling their

[ql-users] Re: [ql-users] Re: [ql-users] Re: [ql-u sers] Re: £ 0.00 to sp end! (1st attem. ..

2004-03-18 Thread Dilwyn Jones
I do announce new versions here. You can also check the latest version at www.scp-paulet-lenerz.com/smsqe Wolfgang I've added this address to the QL Net page on my website, so anyone wanting to check Wolfgang's work and mislaid this email, just go via the net links page on my website. Space

[ql-users] Re: [ql-users] Re: [ql-users] Re: £ 0.00 to spend! (1st attempt)

2004-03-18 Thread Dilwyn Jones
Just wondering if making a new Q60 SMSQ/E would be a matter of bolting on Q60 specific modules to standard SMSQ/E releases? There already are Q60 specific modules. That's what I meant. Not having a Q60 here I didn't know if SMSQ/E for Q60 was same SMSQ/E version as QXL, QPC, Gold Card etc

Re: [ql-users] problem with the new C68 pieces for WMAN

2004-03-18 Thread Geogwilt
In a message dated 14/03/04 11:39:37 GMT Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: After compiling, I am getting an undefined symbol 'RELOC_START'. Looking at my original LIBC_A file, I see it in there but I don't see it in the new version with George's updates. Any ideas? I'm sorry if

Re: [ql-users] £ 0.00 to spend! (1s t attempt)

2004-03-18 Thread Wolfgang Lenerz
On 18 Mar 2004 at 9:24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You might try driving without tyres. But would that be driving? Wolfgang

Re: [ql-users] Re: [ql-users] Re: [ql-users] Re: [ql-u sers] Re: £ 0.00 to sp end! (1st attem. ..

2004-03-18 Thread Wolfgang Lenerz
On 18 Mar 2004 at 14:00, Dilwyn Jones wrote: Space permitting, I might put a little summary of recent changes and version numbers into QL Toady soon. Want me to wend you a text file with the changes? Wolfgang

Re: [ql-users] (1st attempt)

2004-03-18 Thread Wolfgang Lenerz
On 18 Mar 2004 at 13:48, Dilwyn Jones wrote: (...) That's what I meant. Not having a Q60 here I didn't know if SMSQ/E for Q60 was same SMSQ/E version as QXL, QPC, Gold Card etc etc Yes. Of course. That's the whole purpose, innit? Wolfgang

[ql-users] Re: [ql-users] Re: [ql-users] £ 1000 to spend! (2nd attempt!)

2004-03-18 Thread gwicks
- Original Message - From: Dilwyn Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ql-users] Re: [ql-users] £ 1000 to spend! (2nd attempt!) Does this fall into the parameters of what you were looking for Geoff - the possibility of paying someone to extend the SDUMP system. Of course, a small(ish)

[ql-users] Re: [ql-users] Re: [ql-users] Re: [ql-users] Re: [ql-u sers] Re: £ 0.00 to sp end! (1st attem. ..

2004-03-18 Thread Dilwyn Jones
On 18 Mar 2004 at 14:00, Dilwyn Jones wrote: Space permitting, I might put a little summary of recent changes and version numbers into QL Toady soon. Want me to wend you a text file with the changes? Wolfgang I've taken what's on your website, unless you have more? -- Dilwyn Jones

[ql-users] Re: [ql-users] Re: [ql-users] Re: [ql-users] £ 1000 to spend! (2nd attempt!)

2004-03-18 Thread Dilwyn Jones
Does this fall into the parameters of what you were looking for Geoff - the possibility of paying someone to extend the SDUMP system. Of course, a small(ish) job, but one that could be incoporated into a lot of programs. Perhaps we should start thinking of what sort of routines we would

[ql-users] Fancy testing the New Mailing list address ?

2004-03-18 Thread Bruce N
I am in the process of making changes to a more robust mailing list solution for ql-users and would like a few volunteers to test the new system. If you have the time and bandwidth to receive 'two messages for one' please contact me at the address below. - Bruce

[ql-users] Please ignore

2004-03-18 Thread Bruce N
Please ignore this test message.

[ql-users] Beginning a succesful QL journey

2004-03-18 Thread s m gadd
Hi all.. Have been lurking here for a while, reading the various threads, along with looking at different websites, faqs etc. As a beginner, the QL world seemed very complicated, with strangely named Trump Cards, Gold Cards, and hundred of programs, expansions and websites uncomfortably

Re: [ql-users] problem with the new C68 pieces for WMAN

2004-03-18 Thread James Hunkins
This weekend I will try rebuilding everything from scratch (with the suitable backup since I can't afford the downtime :) ). I am thinking that the RELOC stuff might have snuck in during one of the interim 'patches' to the library and might not be needed. Will post my success after I do the