[qmailtoaster] spamhaus - what do you think?

2007-01-26 Thread Jake Vickers
Not really Toaster related, but has anyone else noticed issues now that Spamhaus is merging their lists? I have one server that ONLY uses zen.spamhaus.org in my /var/qmail/control/blacklists and I have had 10 users this week alone (on different ISPs - Roadrunner, Sprint, Comcast) that have

[qmailtoaster] copying users/domains on a different server with different IP

2007-01-26 Thread Massimiliano Fontana
Hi . I'm trying to create a basic failover system not too complex . In other words , I just would like to have my unique domain and user mailboxes replicated on another server . In the event of a crash , the only thing to do for me would be to set on the firewall the backup mail server ip (

Re: [qmailtoaster] copying users/domains on a different server with different IP

2007-01-26 Thread Jake Vickers
Massimiliano Fontana wrote: Hi . I'm trying to create a basic failover system not too complex . In other words , I just would like to have my unique domain and user mailboxes replicated on another server . In the event of a crash , the only thing to do for me would be to set on the firewall

Re: [qmailtoaster] spamhaus - what do you think?

2007-01-26 Thread Netnamin / Compusolve
Jake,This has been causing problems for several of my customers and is a real pain.The note on the spamhaus pbl removal list says that users using dynamic IPs which have fallen into a blocked range don't need to apply as long as they're using smtp authentication(?) - but this doesn't seem to

RE: [qmailtoaster] spamhaus - what do you think?

2007-01-26 Thread Dan Herbon
I've had such an issue with zen.spamhaus.org that I've had to remove it for the time being until I can set my users up on port 587. Most of my users use roadrunner and it appears the PBL list basically has all IP blocks of roadrunner on their block list which has caused me huge problems.

Re: [qmailtoaster] spamhaus - what do you think?

2007-01-26 Thread Jake Vickers
Netnamin / Compusolve wrote: Jake, This has been causing problems for several of my customers and is a real pain. The note on the spamhaus pbl removal list says that users using dynamic IPs which have fallen into a blocked range don't need to apply as long as they're using smtp

Re: [qmailtoaster] copying users/domains on a different server with different IP

2007-01-26 Thread Massimiliano Fontana
I have thought about setting up a backup server for emergencies. But rather than doing it the way you are considering I was going to do it by rsync'ing all of the directories that get used then just having a script that watches the primary machine and changes the IP on the backup box if

Re: [qmailtoaster] copying users/domains on a different server with different IP

2007-01-26 Thread Warren (mailing lists)
Alexey Loukianov wrote: Warren (mailing lists) wrote: Did I forget any? You forgot to also sync MySQL vpopmail database, which cannot be done as a simple rsync. Consider using database replication feature of MySQL, or care about setting up dump-rsync-restore script for this task. Another

Re: [qmailtoaster] spamhaus - what do you think?

2007-01-26 Thread Netnamin / Compusolve
Thanks for that info Jake. (My customers are mainly using dynamic IPs) I'm using qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.5 - does that have the port 587 submission? Also in the newer versions that have this facility is 587 the standard port used, or do you need switch it over to that port. If the latter then

Re: [qmailtoaster] copying users/domains on a different server with different IP

2007-01-26 Thread Warren (mailing lists)
Warren (mailing lists) wrote: Alexey Loukianov wrote: Warren (mailing lists) wrote: Did I forget any? You forgot to also sync MySQL vpopmail database, which cannot be done as a simple rsync. Consider using database replication feature of MySQL, or care about setting up dump-rsync-restore

Re: [qmailtoaster] spamhaus - what do you think?

2007-01-26 Thread Eric \Shubes\
Jake Vickers wrote: Netnamin / Compusolve wrote: Thanks for that info Jake. (My customers are mainly using dynamic IPs) I'm using qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.5 - does that have the port 587 submission? Also in the newer versions that have this facility is 587 the standard port used, or do

Re: [qmailtoaster] copying users/domains on a different server with different IP

2007-01-26 Thread Eric \Shubes\
Warren (mailing lists) wrote: I have thought about setting up a backup server for emergencies. But rather than doing it the way you are considering I was going to do it by rsync'ing all of the directories that get used then just having a script that watches the primary machine and changes

Re: [qmailtoaster] qtp-newmodel errors

2007-01-26 Thread George Sweetnam
qtp-newmodel doesn't handle djbdns at the moment (I use bind, so testing djbdns is problematic for me). I hope to have it fixed in the next release. Eric, If you have a test version of your installation scripts with djbdns I can run some test installations for you. I have a nice dualcpu

Re: [qmailtoaster] Banned from using RulesDuJour?

2007-01-26 Thread Jake Vickers
-f /etc/mail/spamassassin/RulesDuJour/antidrug.cf.20070126-0316 /etc/mail/spamassassin/antidrug.cf; Lint output: [26016] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping: README: [26016] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping: WARNING: YOU HAVE DOWNLOADED THIS RULESET from COMCAST. I am

Re: [qmailtoaster] qtp-newmodel errors

2007-01-26 Thread Igor Vukotić
Prblem is because script try to install more djbdns rpm-s; when i do manualy, i understand what happend; when i execute rpmbuild --rebuild --with cnt40 djbdns*.src.rpm it's create 4 rpms in /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386 djbdns-1.05-1.0.3.i386.rpmdjbdns-extcache-1.05-1.0.3.i386.rpm

Re: [qmailtoaster] Banned from using RulesDuJour?

2007-01-26 Thread Vince Callaway
On Fri, 2007-01-26 at 11:49 -0500, Jake Vickers wrote: He's moving the ruleset to a Verizon IP address and will be phasing out the Comast server. This makes more sense. The way I read it was he was not allowing downloads from anyone that was ON comcast. I've removed it from all of my

Re: [qmailtoaster] Qmailtoaster on Debian

2007-01-26 Thread Igor Vukotić
I setup debian sarge on Xen and im realy curius . :) i will try and report you.. On 2007.01.26, at 00:18, Jake Vickers wrote: Alexey Loukianov wrote: Greetings, Jake. 25 января 2007 г., 22:10:09 you have wrote: Short answer is no. There's another possible answer ;-). Yes, if you will

Re: [qmailtoaster] Yahoo bulk folder and domainkeys

2007-01-26 Thread CanopyAdmin
Trung Pham wrote: I am the authoritative DNS server for my domain. This is how I am able to setup SPF and Domainkey. But still no luck with reverse DNS. Is there anyone who is able to setup reverse DNS having SBC as their ISP? try this: === Below is a summary of Reverse

Re: [qmailtoaster] Banned from using RulesDuJour?

2007-01-26 Thread Eric \Shubes\
/RulesDuJour/antidrug.cf.2; mv -f /etc/mail/spamassassin/RulesDuJour/antidrug.cf.20070126-0316 /etc/mail/spamassassin/antidrug.cf; Lint output: [26016] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping: README: [26016] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping: WARNING: YOU HAVE DOWNLOADED

Re: [qmailtoaster] qtp-newmodel errors

2007-01-26 Thread Eric \Shubes\
George Sweetnam wrote: qtp-newmodel doesn't handle djbdns at the moment (I use bind, so testing djbdns is problematic for me). I hope to have it fixed in the next release. Eric, If you have a test version of your installation scripts with djbdns I can run some test installations for

Re: [qmailtoaster] qtp-newmodel errors

2007-01-26 Thread Eric \Shubes\
Thanks, Igor. I think I can get it fixed up right with this info. It probably won't be until next Wed before I can get to it though. Patience is appreciated. Igor Vukotic' wrote: Prblem is because script try to install more djbdns rpm-s; when i do manualy, i understand what happend; when i

Re: [qmailtoaster] Banned from using RulesDuJour?

2007-01-26 Thread Jake Vickers
Eric Shubes wrote: Jake, Does this affect QTP RDJ? I'm not using RDJ (yet). Not anymore. The RDJ installed by QTP gets it's initial config from my server (http://v2gnu.com/qmail/rdjconfig) from which I've already removed that ruleset. Anyone who has already installed RDJ from the QTP

RE: [qmailtoaster] Banned from using RulesDuJour?

2007-01-26 Thread Steve Ingraham
Jake, Does this apply to my two servers you have helped me with, the old one currently running and the new one we configured? Is this antidrug option something I need to deal with? Steve Ingraham -Original Message- From: Jake Vickers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] Banned from using RulesDuJour?

2007-01-26 Thread Jake Vickers
Steve Ingraham wrote: Jake, Does this apply to my two servers you have helped me with, the old one currently running and the new one we configured? Is this antidrug option something I need to deal with? Don't worry about it - if they're still in there I will take them out this weekend.

Re: [qmailtoaster] setting noreplace more in *-toaster.specs

2007-01-26 Thread Quinn Comendant
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007 19:22:30 -0700, Eric Shubes wrote: %{qdir}/supervise/spamd/run I don't think of this as a configuration file. [...] It's not really a configuration file but because it is something that might be fine-tuned there is a strong advantage to adding the %config(noreplace) flag