[racket-users] Re: pkg-build report for the v6.2 release candidate

2015-05-15 Thread Jack Firth
On Thursday, May 14, 2015 at 5:36:23 PM UTC-7, Matthew Flatt wrote: Here are the results of a package build using the v6.2 release candidate: http://release-pkg-build.racket-lang.org.s3-website-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/ Compare to v6.1.1: http://pkg-build.racket-lang.org/ For the

Re: [racket-users] Environment Shuffling and 3D Syntax

2015-05-15 Thread Philip Blair
Sorry for the delay (I was moving earlier this week). Thank you for taking a crack at the task. One question I have is whether or not the scopes feature is something which I can more or less count on being available in future versions of Racket (I understand that it's from a snapshot and might

Re: [racket-users] Environment Shuffling and 3D Syntax

2015-05-15 Thread Matthew Flatt
At Fri, 15 May 2015 11:09:25 -0400, Philip Blair wrote: One question I have is whether or not the scopes feature is something which I can more or less count on being available in future versions of Racket That's not yet clear. Although most existing code would be unaffected by the change to a

Re: [racket-users] pkg-build report for the v6.2 release candidate

2015-05-15 Thread Greg Hendershott
This is OT wrt deps and doc, but: I don't understand this reported test failure for rackjure, on both versions of Racket: test.rkt: raco test: non-empty stderr: #\nFAILURE\nname: check-exn\nlocation:

Re: [racket-users] pkg-build report for the v6.2 release candidate

2015-05-15 Thread 'John Clements' via users-redirect
On May 14, 2015, at 4:08 PM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote: Here are the results of a package build using the v6.2 release candidate: http://release-pkg-build.racket-lang.org.s3-website-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/ Compare to v6.1.1: http://pkg-build.racket-lang.org/ I believe

Re: [racket-users] Re: pkg-build report for the v6.2 release candidate

2015-05-15 Thread Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
What happened was a new _documented_ export was added to `racket/match`: `match-define-values`. But yes, creating some dedicated test modules is a good idea so that this doesn't happen every release. Sam On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 3:28 AM Jack Firth jackhfi...@gmail.com wrote: On Thursday, May