> On Dec 27, 2016, at 1:57 PM, Robby Findler
> wrote:
>
> The main thing I worry about is that there are standard conventions
> that we're missing from other language families. Would someone mind
> investigating a few other, popular languages
FWIW Racket's own `~r` function already accepts rad
> On Dec 27, 2016, at 2:23 PM, Philip McGrath wrote:
> However, when I just tried to simulate a smartphone viewport with the Chrome
> developer tools, I got the "non-mobile friendly" behavior Michael described.
> (I don't have my phone on me right now, so I haven't checked that.)
I believe th
On Tue, 27 Dec 2016 22:23:49 +, Philip McGrath
wrote:
>Has something changed recently in the CSS for the Racket documentation? I
>thought that formerly the phone layout was equivalent to what happens if
>you manually resize a desktop/laptop browser window to be quite narrow: the
>sidebar / ta
I think it better to extend the radix of `string->number` and
`number->string` to 2...36(inclusive) for now, and take more time to
think about bigger ranges.
I'm not sure about a good convention for a bigger radix, like 60.
(number->string 100 60 #:symbols '("01" "02" ... "59") #:separator ":")
(n
What you have is fine, but you need to give it a DC where
get-gl-context doesn't return false. (Such as by making a canvas with
the 'gl style.) In addition, you do NOT want a legacy context.
I recommend looking at the example code:
https://github.com/jeapostrophe/mode-lambda/blob/master/mode-lamb
Has something changed recently in the CSS for the Racket documentation? I
thought that formerly the phone layout was equivalent to what happens if
you manually resize a desktop/laptop browser window to be quite narrow: the
sidebar / table of contents goes away and a navigation bar appears at the
to
The main thing I worry about is that there are standard conventions
that we're missing from other language families. Would someone mind
investigating a few other, popular languages to see what they do so
that can be taken into account? And perhaps pointing to the docs or
showing some example code?
I don't see any reason why not, and it doesn't seem (by the discussion)
that anyone is strongly against.
Would you be interested in submitting a pull request to extend
`string->number`? You'd probably want to extend `number->string` as
well, and possibly others.
Vincent
On Thu, 22 Dec 2016 05:
Hi All,
I am experimenting with mode-lambda. The example below
shows how to draw sprites on different layers using the software backend.
However I would like to try the gl backend instead.
What is the correct incantation?
/Jens Axel
#lang racket
(require mode-lambda
mode-lambda/static
Hi all,
I asked this question over at stackoverflow and this seemed to be the place to
ask.
I was wondering if there is a built in way to create mobile friendly HTML in
Scribble? Given Google's current mobile friendly policy
(https://webmasters.googleblog.com/2015/04/rolling-out-mobile-friend
Thanks for both answers! I'll report back when I've made some progress!
Cheers,
Tim
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to racket-users+unsubscr...@go
> On Dec 27, 2016, at 2:32 AM, Tim Hanson wrote:
>
> Hi, I think I'd like to try using racket as a way to explore relatively
> simple ways of getting a grip on some mail accounts that have gotten out of
> hand. Specifically I'd like to be able to
> - compute some statistics, such as number of
One small point: I think it was good in the old site to have a link to the
documentation right at the top, where now there are just "Packages" and
"Download". We have great documentation (with a great design, thanks to
Matthew!), better put it forward :)
> 2. Greyed out code snippets - I am not
Greg, maybe you could push a commit to travis-racket, changing the URL to the
currently-working one, and revert that after the maintenance?
That way the repos which fetch travis-racket on the fly would still build while
mirror.racket-lang.org is down.
--
You received this message because you a
On Mon, 26 Dec 2016 23:32:48 -0800 (PST), Tim Hanson
wrote:
>Hi, I think I'd like to try using racket as a way to explore
>relatively simple ways of getting a grip on some mail accounts
>that have gotten out of hand. Specifically I'd like to be able
>to
>- compute some statistics, such as number
15 matches
Mail list logo