Re: [racket-users] Re: minimal vs full racket performance issues

2017-03-17 Thread Matthew Flatt
At Thu, 16 Mar 2017 16:10:04 -0700 (PDT), Jack Firth wrote: > Side question for Racket package system folks: will the migration to Chez > scheme affect binary installs of packages? I seem to recall discussion that > bytecode might be going away as part of the Chez transition. I don't yet know ho

[racket-users] Re: minimal vs full racket performance issues

2017-03-16 Thread Jack Firth
On Thursday, March 16, 2017 at 3:25:34 PM UTC-7, Dan Liebgold wrote: > Is there a way to do minimal installs of packages? I imagine skipping any > gui elements would cut down the dependencies quite a bit. You can install a package in binary form with `raco pkg install --binary foo`, which fetch