Re: [RDA-L] 336, 337, 338 and the post-MARC environment

2013-05-09 Thread Kadri, Carolyn J
Are the 336,337,338's meant to be displayed? Probably not. Maybe, meant to be used as accessible codes for a FRBRised catalog search yet to be developed? Carolyn Kadri Special Collections Cataloger University of Texas at Arlington From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and

Re: [RDA-L] Contributors' list

2013-04-30 Thread Kadri, Carolyn J
I think you could use Project director from the MARC CodeLlist for Relators. The definition is as follows Use for a person or organization with primary responsibility for all essential aspects of a project, or that manages a very large project that demands senior level responsibility, or that

Re: [RDA-L] First Page is Unnumbered (pagination is part of a larger sequence)

2013-04-17 Thread Kadri, Carolyn J
I use your number 2 option. It seems the more logical way in the spirit of RDA. I don't think we should ignore unnumbered pages in a resource. At this point, a standardized way of indicating this situation (unnumbered pages in a resource) is evolving and should become part of a best practices

Re: [RDA-L] Tag 9 in Bib Record

2013-04-04 Thread Kadri, Carolyn J
I have looked this OCLC record over and over and I don't see a tag field 9 or 466 in it. Is it possible you are referencing the wrong OCLC record? Carolyn Kadri Special Collections Cataloger University of Texas at Arlington Arlington, TX 76019 817-272-7153 From: Resource Description and

Re: [RDA-L] Relationships and comic books/graphic novels

2013-04-04 Thread Kadri, Carolyn J
Crowley Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 10:33 AM To: RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.camailto:RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Relationships and comic books/graphic novels Perhaps you could construe the colorist as an illuminator? ;) On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Kadri, Carolyn J ka

Re: [RDA-L] Corrected DVD sample

2013-03-18 Thread Kadri, Carolyn J
The link you provided to sample RDA records isn't working for me. When I click it on I get the report page not found. Any ideas? Carolyn -Original Message- From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of J.

Re: [RDA-L] Corrected DVD sample

2013-03-18 Thread Kadri, Carolyn J
, Carolyn J Sent: Monday, March 18, 2013 11:29 AM To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Corrected DVD sample The link you provided to sample RDA records isn't working for me. When I click it on I get the report page not found. Any ideas? Carolyn -Original Message- From: Resource

Re: [RDA-L] Relator code and term punctucation

2013-03-08 Thread Kadri, Carolyn J
I have been putting a comma after the name and a period after the relator code and no period after $4. Example: Smith, James, $e publisher. $4 pbl Don't know that any one way is better than the other, but in the absence of any instructions anywhere, I defaulted to this pattern because it

Re: [RDA-L] GMD revisited

2013-01-31 Thread Kadri, Carolyn J
Has anyone using Voyager decided to do this? That is, add back 245/ $h gmd in the local system? I agree that the 336, 337, 338 don’t need to be viewable which ours are not. Thanks. Carolyn Kadri Special Collections Cataloger University of Texas at Arlington Arlington, TX 76019 817-272-7153

Re: [RDA-L] Relator terms vs. codes

2012-10-24 Thread Kadri, Carolyn J
I am just wondering if anyone else is putting both relator text, subfield e, and subfield 4, relator codes, in their OCLC originals? In the absence of any information about use one or the other, I have been inputting both in my original contributions to OCLC. In most cases, using the MARC21

Re: [RDA-L] Relator terms vs. codes

2012-10-24 Thread Kadri, Carolyn J
according to their preferences? Thanks. Carolyn -Original Message- From: J. McRee Elrod [mailto:m...@slc.bc.ca] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2012 12:42 PM To: Kadri, Carolyn J Cc: RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Relator terms vs. codes Carolyn Kadri asked: I am just

Re: [RDA-L] Order of 040 subfields

2012-08-18 Thread Kadri, Carolyn J
I have been following this thread about the 040. Does it really matter what order the subfields are placed in in the 040 in an online environment? Does it affect any retrieval reports? Are we being a little anal-retentive in devoting so much discussion to this issue just for the sake of

Re: [RDA-L] Order of 040 subfields

2012-08-01 Thread Kadri, Carolyn J
For the 040, I have been trying to follow the order given in a new RDA workform; that is, $b eng followed by $e rda Don't know if it makes any difference or not what the order is. Carolyn Kadri Head Cataloger Special Collections University of Texas at Arlington Arlington, TX 76016

Re: [RDA-L] 260 vs 264 fields

2012-07-16 Thread Kadri, Carolyn J
Also, even though OCLC has given permission to use the 264 now, the advice I am getting from OCLC is that it might be better to postpone using it until more clarification is available to those of us out in the trenches about how it is to be applied. I am not sure where that clarification of

Re: [RDA-L] Comparison table of extent terms

2012-04-11 Thread Kadri, Carolyn J
Thanks Adam, I have been creating original cataloging for 19th century atlases in RDA and using two 336's one for cartographic image and one for text to my RDA record to account for those volumes that are atlases but have a significant amount of text as do many of the 19th century atlases

Re: [RDA-L] RDA database now with MARC index

2008-12-04 Thread Kadri, Carolyn J
Are some MARC tags being eliminated in RDA? I tried the MARC index mentioned below just to experiment with it. I put in 534 in the box, and the only reproduction MARC field that came up was 533. Appendix D of RDA only references 533 also. Just curious. Thanks. Carolyn Kadri Chair, Map and

Re: [RDA-L] RDA and reproductions

2008-12-04 Thread Kadri, Carolyn J
How do you know that no one is using the 534 for reproductions right now? I use it quite frequently when cataloging reproductions of pre-twentieth cartographic materials. Carolyn -Original Message- From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access [mailto:[EMAIL