smime.p7m
Description: S/MIME encrypted message
] RDA name authorities |c (Fictitious
character)
Thanks. I thought that must be the case but needed the validation.
As Michelle Cronquist noted, I'm seeing a mix of records with the |c variously
applied or not.
I'm still not at all comfortable with the reissued name authority record for
Holmes
Bernhard, S. Michael mbernh...@cabq.gov wrote:
It seems to me, too, that the heading for Holmes should be Holmes,
Sherlock |c (Fictitious character). Do
others agree? If I were still at a NACO library, I might go ahead and
correct both headings (unless I've missed
something somewhere with
-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of M. E.
Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2013 2:27 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Thanks RE: [RDA-L] RDA name authorities |c (Fictitious
character)
Bernhard, S. Michael mbernh...@cabq.govmailto:mbernh...@cabq.gov wrote:
It seems to me, too, that the heading
Robert Maxwell robert_maxw...@byu.edu wrote:
No one should be “correcting” authorized access points that were
correctly established under current policy, which is to include the
qualifier if there is a conflict but otherwise not.
But the material of 9.6.1.7 falls under the 9.19.1.2 group of
@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of M. E.
Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2013 2:49 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Thanks RE: [RDA-L] RDA name authorities |c (Fictitious
character)
Robert Maxwell robert_maxw...@byu.edumailto:robert_maxw...@byu.edu wrote:
No one should
Robert Maxwell robert_maxw...@byu.edu wrote:
In a message to the PCC list dated September 4, 2013, Kate James of the
LC Policy and Standards Division addressed this issue (with reference to
the record for “Holmes, Sherlock”):
Thanks for the reminder, Bob. Looking through my inbox, I held
7 matches
Mail list logo
