Manon, Margaret, Diane,
Thank you for the clarifications / corrections to my post. I should have
mentioned that I have no first-hand knowledge of the groups in question
and that my info may not be complete.
Particularly good to know that the call for public comments is still
open for
-- Forwarded message --
From: Gene Fieg gf...@cst.edu
Date: Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 10:29 AM
Subject: References from one chapter to another in RDA
To: RDA-L rd...@infoserv.nlc-bnc.ca
Reading (slogging?) through RDA now. I am in chapter 19. I noticed that
for official
For at least some of this, the Element Set View (which I hadn't explored until
yesterday) is a great help. It assembles all the rules relevant to a particular
RDA Element together in one place. Sometimes the rules so assembled are
contiguous in RDA itself, but sometimes there are reference (and
But where does it say to use both the official's name (Catholic Church. Pope
... ) and the personal name as access points to an official proclamation,
etc.
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Mark Ehlert ehler...@umn.edu wrote:
Gene Fieg gf...@cst.edu wrote:
Reading (slogging?) through RDA
Gene Fieg gf...@cst.edu wrote:
But where does it say to use both the official's name (Catholic Church. Pope
... ) and the personal name as access points to an official proclamation,
etc.
I couldn't find an explicit instruction on this unless it's buried
somewhere--somebody with better eyes
It doesn't say that anywhere, although you are correct that in the
examples we carried over the practice of making an added entry for the
person holding the office. Basically, it's a judgment on what entities
are responsible for a resource, and I think one could argue that while the
These corporate body access points for persons holding an office are strange
hermaphrodites that are peculiar to the Anglo-American tradition, I think. The
idea of using both a corporate heading for the official and a personal name
heading for the same person on records for official
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Mark Ehlert [ehler...@umn.edu]
Sent: April-13-11 4:56 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Fwd: References from one
Forwarded with permission.
Hal Cain
Melbourne, Australia
hec...@dml.vic.edu.au
-
Call for papers: The FRBR Family of Models
A special issue of Cataloging Classification Quarterly will be
devoted to The FRBR Family of Models.
Since 1998 when Functional
However, the find and identify tasks require that the personal
name of the holder of the office be an access point for documents of
this kind, because these documents are very commonly cited under the
writer's name. Indeed I think I could argue a case for considering the
names of popes,
Quoting John Hostage host...@law.harvard.edu:
These corporate body access points for persons holding an office are
strange hermaphrodites that are peculiar to the Anglo-American
tradition, I think. The idea of using both a corporate heading for
the official and a personal name heading for
Call for papers: The FRBR Family of Models
A special issue of Cataloging Classification Quarterly will be devoted to The
FRBR Family of Models.
Since 1998 when Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records was first
published by IFLA, the
effort to develop and apply FRBR has been
12 matches
Mail list logo
