Greta
Wouldn't a relationship designator in an X11 field go in $j? X11 $e is
for subordinate unit.
Regards
Richard
_
Richard Moore
Authority Control Team Manager
The British Library
Tel.: +44
The Google Books entry for The Director's Event shows that the sections
of the book are headed, Abraham Polonsky, Budd Boetticher, etc., so
it does seem that this resource consists of five quite separate and
substantial interviews, each with a different creator-level interviewee,
in which case I
This discussion led me back to MARC 21 site.
Did not find any examples of what is being talked about, but I did find
this:
*111*
*1#**$a*Chicago.*$q*Cartography Conference.
How would one search for that in the authority file?
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 6:27 AM, Greta de Groat
I have a Greek book, with the preface numbered in Greek numerals (cf.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greek_numerals).
I assume that I would follow RDA 3.4.5.2, Record pages, etc., that are
numbered in words by giving the numeric equivalent and record:
15, 418 pages
and add a note:
Pages 1-15
And we're worried about ca. and other Latin abbreviations???
Would use Arabic numbers. Put the Greek enumeration, if you want. If you
put in the 300 field, it will definitely Greek to the patron.
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Benjamin A Abrahamse babra...@mit.eduwrote:
I have a Greek
Mac Elrod wrote:
By definition isn't any person, body, or family in 1XX a creator?
No, the entity in the 1XX field may be an Other Person, Family, or Corporate
Body Associated with a Work (RDA 19.3). Most of these seem to be legal works
or religious works.
For systems which list the 700$t
Just a question here. Are these relator codes mandatory in RDA?
I hope not. Just ran across one for dramatist, Tony Kushner, that had the
relator, aus
Is a patron going to instinctively know what that means? I have yet to
look it up. I think it means author of script.
Have we substituted one
As far as I known, the language of 300 fields depends on your cataloging
language. If it is a English bibliographic record (for a Greek book), the
300 field should be in English. So I would use Arabic numbers.
Thanks,
Joan Wang
Illinois Heartland Library System
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 1:41 PM,
The relator codes existed long before RDA and are not specific to RDA.
aus means Author of screenplay. The codes are not intended to be
understood as is by patrons, any more than fixed field data. In theory they
can displayed (or not) however your institution wishes in the catalog, or
used for
-Original Message-
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of J. McRee Elrod
Sent: May-07-13 3:46 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Relator terms in author/title added entries?
I have created a record for the provider-neutral e-book OCLC #842051596. Would
someone be so kind as to look it over just to make sure I haven't forgotten
something? Also, does anyone have a handy list of traps to avoid when creating
an RDA record, something like, Be sure you don't forget to do
Hi Jay,
I’m not sure if this is really what you’re looking for, but I’ll share my
checklist for deriving an RDA record from AACR2 copy. It’s *not* intended to
be exhaustive, just some things that I tend to forget when deriving from AACR2
copy. The checklist lives on our internal wiki, which
I'm sure you already know about this, but in case you don't:
www.loc.gov/aba/pcc/scs/documents/PN-RDA-Combined.docxhttp://www.loc.gov/aba/pcc/scs/documents/PN-RDA-Combined.docx
Chris Fox
Catalog Librarian
McKay Library
Brigham Young Univ.-Idaho
c...@byui.edumailto:c...@byui.edu
From: Resource
I know others have responded already and I agree with giving the Arabic form
(“15, 418 pages”) in the “main” extent statement, but I usually also give a
parallel field with the Greek numeral in these cases.
This isn’t a case of RDA 3.4.5.2—the Greek numeral isn’t a word, it’s a
numeral, so
Hello cataloguers
Do any of you catalogue items that are both hard copy and a PDF file in the one
catalogue record? I realise it is probably not common practice, but this has
been done in my workplace for years and now that I am starting to use RDA I'm
unsure whether to continue and whether
Kyley Felix asked:
Do any of you catalogue items that are both hard copy and a PDF file
in the one catalogue record?
We did not with AACR2, because of differing fixed fields and GMD. We
will not with RDA because of differing fixed fields and 33X.
There is also the matter of ease of plating
Kyley,
These are two different manifestations and they are not issued together,
so I don't think you can or should describe them as a multipart monograph.
In RDA you would probably create two separate records, but you could
probably just create a record for the print and then note the
17 matches
Mail list logo
