-Original Message-
Karen Coyle wrote:
Actually my big concern is that the entity Person may make sense as a
subject but we don't have persons as creators, only personal names. That
name may be a pseudonym used by two actual human beings, or there could
be many names associated with one
Myers, John F. wrote:
To my thinking, each manifestation will have a statement of
responsibility as an attribute, recorded in the manifestation entity
record. Based on that attribute, the manifestation entity record will
link to the corresponding personal (corporate, conference) entity
-Original Message-
Karen Coyle wrote:
And your definition of person will determine what these relevant data
elements are, and what you can do with this data. If you your persons
are bibliographic entities then they can't interact with data about
real persons (LDAP databases, the
At 12:02 PM 6/4/2008, Karen Coyle wrote:
And your definition of person will determine what these relevant data
elements are, and what you can do with this data. If you your persons
are bibliographic entities then they can't interact with data about
real persons (LDAP databases, the copyright
-Original Message-
From: John Attig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: RDA-L@INFOSERV.NLC-BNC.CA
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 13:39:07 -0400
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] The Person entity [was: Comments from Martha M. Yee ... 1
of 2]
However, I would note that in 99.9% of the cases, the bibliographic
identity and
5 matches
Mail list logo
