As a follow up question on this topic, I would like to ask if
MurckoScaffold.GetScaffoldForMol(mol) returns the scaffold of mol with
different coordinates?
I am asking this because when I use the transformation matrix of the
alignment of the cores of the probe and the reference molecules, in order
HI Thomas,
To be sure we're talking about the same thing: rdMolAlign.GetO3A() is an
implementation of the Open3DAlign algorithm. This is an unsupervised
approach that uses a clever algorithm to come up with an atom-atom mapping
between the two molecules you give it. It's not always going to pick
I believe (Greg can correct me) to align the bemis-murcko scaffold, you
could
(1) extract the original atom pairs and send them to the RMSD algorithm
(2) take a bemis scaffold and convert it to a substructure query for use in
the RMSD algorithm. In either case the RMSD is the rmsd of the
Greg and Brian,
Thank you for your useful hints. All the compounds that I want to align are
supposed to belong to the same analogue series so they should shave a
common substructure with substantial size.
What I want to emulate is the "core restrained docking" with glide, where
you specify the
Hi Michal,
We've only ever done python2.7 builds for win32 and we stopped doing those
with the 2016.03 release.
I will have to check, but I think I probably can start doing these again,
but I'm reluctant due to the amount of effort required.
How many users do you need to support who are stuck on
At least for the MCS calculation, there is an R package
for chemistry:
https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/vignettes/fmcsR/inst/doc/fmcsR.html
On 02/19/2017 07:33 PM, Thomas Evangelidis wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I want to align 250 compounds that binding to the same pocket to one of
>
I don't know the exact glide procedure, but I did write such a system for
OpenEye (POSIT). The issue you are facing is that the RMSD portion is just
a constraint used for docking, it isn't used as the "score", in fact, it
can't tell if the conformation interpenetrates the active site or which
With Glide, IIRC, this facility is designed for the use case where the
coordinates of a docked ligand are known (typically from an X-ray
structure) and the docked ligand shares a SMARTS with the ligands in an
input file. The SMARTS-matching atoms of each incoming ligand are
superposed upon the
Hi Greg,
Thanks for your reply. Actually, >50% of my (prospective) users are stuck
on 32-bit. It would be really nice to have a python3 build (even once a
year) but I understand that the demand is low and waning. I guess the
solution is to use python2.7 for the time being...
Thanks and kind
@Peter
I am working exactly on the scenario you described.
@Brian
I have found this thread which is pretty similar to my case and to what you
suggested, so now I am adapting my code accordingly.
https://sourceforge.net/p/rdkit/mailman/message/35034093/
What you have published sounds
Hello Thomas,
This publication could be of interest to you. I have not read the whole
paper so I don't know how relevant it is.
Ling
Graph-Based Molecular Alignment (GMA)
Marialke, Korner, Tietze, Apostolakis
J. Chem. Inf. Model. 47 (2007) 591-601
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 3:32 PM, Thomas
Hi Greg, I am using 32-bit python27 and anaconda (with 64-bit windows 10).
So I cannot update to latest version and test as you proposed several days ago.
Since it did not trouble me, I plan to upgrade all this environment in the
future.
BTW, is it necessary to upgrade python into 3.6
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 6:17 PM, Thomas Evangelidis
wrote:
>
> Thank you for your useful hints. All the compounds that I want to align
> are supposed to belong to the same analogue series so they should shave a
> common substructure with substantial size.
>
In that case,
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 4:18 AM, 杨弘宾 wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> I am using 32-bit python27 and anaconda (with 64-bit windows 10). So I
> cannot update to latest version and test with "abnormal" operation of rdMolDraw2D> as you proposed several days
> ago.
> Since it did
14 matches
Mail list logo