Eugene invokes *Wooley *to make the following comparison:
If Maynard can't be required to carry the motto 'Live Free or Die' on his
car, then a Maynard who is a generally will-take-most-commissions freelance
writer can’t be required to write a press release or organizational
newsletter that
I'm pretty sure that Eugene is correct--freelance wedding photographs
are generally protected under the category of pictorial, graphic, or
sculptural works, and as such are not eligible to be works for hire.
(Photographs submitted to magazines or newspapers are treated
differently, as they are
You may be pretty sure, but I'm absolutely certain that the photos I purchased
from our wedding photographer, as well as all school and graduation photos, are
owned by me and not the photographer. I purchased them, and own the rights.
That's what I paid for. For the photographer to retain any
We've wandered far from religion -- but that is very wrong, Z.
You own the copies -- the specific photos that you purchased. And if you
photographer gave you negatives (in the old days) or a CD with electronic
versions you can copy or print from (semi-old days) or access to or electronic
I am absolutely certain because that is what is stated in the purchase
agreement.
Thanks,
-Z
- Original Message -
From: Steven Jamar stevenja...@gmail.com
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
Sent: Sunday, August 25, 2013 2:06:55 PM
Subject: Re:
Sent from Steve's iPhone
On Aug 25, 2013, at 2:32 PM, Len campquest...@comcast.net wrote:
I am absolutely certain because that is what is stated in the purchase
agreement.
Thanks,
-Z
From: Steven Jamar stevenja...@gmail.com
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
This academic year's National Religious Freedom Moot Court Competition will
be held at George Washington University Law School on February 7-8, 2014.
This year's problem considers a hypothetical federal program that provides
funding for houses of worship, along with other community facilities, to
My wife tells me there are now two models.
1. Photographer retains copyright, and you buy the photos you want.
2. You pay multi-thousands of dollars up front. Then the photographer takes
lots and lots of pictures and sends you the CD (or DVD), and you do what you
want with them. This approach
Regardless of the models, I did not pay thousands for my photos. A few hundred
for the graduation photos, and a few hundred for the wedding photos 30 years
ago.
It is my understanding that the studio protects all photos by way of copyright
that are posted and accessed via its website
Folks: This list is designed for technical legal discussions
about the law of government and religion, and is aimed generally at law
professors who specialize in the field. Please keep list discussions focused
on that, rather than on general discussions about other areas of
10 matches
Mail list logo
