On 9/3/2010 3:07 PM, terry dalpoas wrote:
Does anyone know if the voice on this controller use a TI voice synthesizer
or if it has the real speech like on the Arcom RC210? Someone in the club
liked how my RLC 1 Plus sounds and he wants one that sounds like it, but less
expensive.
Yes,
On 9/3/2010 3:53 PM, Ken Arck wrote:
At 12:36 PM 9/3/2010, wd8chl wrote:
On 9/3/2010 3:07 PM, terry dalpoas wrote:
It also has the means to upload sound files (well, they need to be
converted), so it can say
about anything you want it to.
---So does the 210g
Ken
Yup!
On 8/31/2010 12:34 PM, Chuck Kelsey wrote:
Yes, a screwdriver is your friend.
Chuck
WB2EDV
- Original Message -
From:dmur...@verizon.net
To:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Cc:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 12:21 PM
Subject: Re: Re:
On 8/31/2010 2:05 PM, ka9qjg wrote:
OK Great , Thanks to Everyone who answered , I will sleep better now
one less thing to worry about
Don KA9QJG
Not the same thing, but something else to remember: Mount them
vertically! If you mount them horizontally, you run the risk of the
rods warping
On 8/30/2010 11:50 PM, terry dalpoas wrote:
Thanks Steve, that answered my question. I did not mean to start such a big
discussion on this. The only reason I asked about the radio was some local
hams
said that they could not be used unless the radio is FCC approved. I told
them
that it
On 8/27/2010 1:56 PM, Tom Manning wrote:
Hello Jim I note your message about narrowbanding and the comment
about the MSR2000. I have seen no info on doing so but it seems to
me that the MSR200 could be narrowbanded. The MSR is very similar to
the Mitrek and it can be narrowbanded by using a
On 8/30/2010 11:28 AM, ka2ajh wrote:
Good Morning to the Group. I have a new RLS1000 Hub and a RC210 and
have read where Skipp and others have been successful in interfacing
the hub with the controller for more ports, but don't see how the
connections are made. Does Skipp or anyone else have
On 8/17/2010 11:55 PM, Ray Brown wrote:
What do you do when you want to install a small UHF linking repeater on
a 4-story building that has no lightning protection on its' roof? (this is to
link an ambulance at a hospital to its' base repeater 40 miles away)
From what I've heard, it may
On 8/18/2010 11:46 AM, Bill Smith wrote:
The building has a steel support structure, I'm sure. You will need to bond to
that as a start.
Bill
An even better choice, yes.
You should be able to clean off a spot and clamp to an I-beam. Make sure
you get down to bare metal under the clamp.
On 8/11/2010 2:51 PM, Sid wrote:
I have seen a lot of jumpers, interconning cables, duplexer cables,
etc made using RG-142 and RG-400 (the 400 is preferred). However,
RG-223 is also silver, double shielded,very flexible, and also about
RG-58 size. Any reason why RG-223 would not work just as
On 8/4/2010 12:04 AM, Steve Denbow wrote:
Hello Group!
I have this board (the one on the RIGHT) in a high band MASTR II
station operating as a 2M repeater. The board on the LEFT is out of
a sister station, which I have information on. I can not find
information on this board (RIGHT) doing
On 8/4/2010 9:18 AM, Joe wrote:
Sometimes troubles like this are hard to find because you can't be there
when it is happening. I have found that a Radio Shack Digital Voltmeter
that I have and an old laptop have been handy for such times. I bought
an RS DVM with the RS-232 interface on sale
On 8/2/2010 11:15 PM, skipp025 wrote:
... The entire project including obtaining the parts from
recycled radios takes me about 4.5 hours with beverage of
choice and some decent AM Talk-Radio playing at low back-ground
volume level (no, not the right-wing whack job stuff).
As opposed to the
On 8/2/2010 11:23 PM, Glenn Little WB4UIV wrote:
I do not know about Nextel, but, the US DTV signal fits into a 6 MHz
bandwidth.
We use a mask filter to ensure that the bandwidth is no more than 6 MHz.
500 kHz from band edge= -47 dB
6 MHz from band edge= -110 dB
73
Glenn
WB4UIV
And
On 8/2/2010 9:37 AM, Jeff DePolo wrote:
Florida Repeater Coordinator proposes narrowbanding:
http://www.florida-repeaters.org/FRC%202meter%20narrowband%20p
olicy%20released%207-18-10.pdf
Apparently Carson's Rule works different in Florida than it does everywhere
else.
On 8/2/2010 10:45 AM, Scott Zimmerman wrote:
I was wondering about that myself. The bandwidths spec'd just didn't
seem to compute in my feeble mind.
Scott
Scott Zimmerman
Amateur Radio Call N3XCC
474 Barnett Road
Boswell, PA 15531
Jeff DePolo wrote:
Florida Repeater Coordinator
On 7/17/2010 12:47 PM, Bill Smith wrote:
Used is false economy. You end with someone elses problems and high
maintenance
costs as well as downtime which is a bad thing for an ambulance company. The
4010 is a nice reliable system, much simpler than the RoIP stuff but not
nearly
as
On 7/18/2010 10:28 AM, Steve Jones wrote:
Thanks for everyone's input.
Controller choice seems to be like a religion. Everybody has their
favourite and are reluctant to try another brand.
Didn't see anybody mention S-Com!
http://www.scomcontrollers.com/
It'll do what you want, and they
Don't forget that Micor/Mitrek/Syntor/X/Mostar/and just about any other
one from that era will work. I think Maxtrac mics will work
too...maybe...I know a Maxtrac desk mic can be plugged into an older
radio-all you have to do is change the cord...and vice-versa-Maxar desk
mics will work on
On 7/19/2010 10:02 AM, Joe wrote:
S-Com can be a love/hate relationship. The older models did not have
an RS-232 interface, so you needed to keep track of everything
religiously on paper. BUT, they seemed to last forever. I have a few
of them and they have never glitched..never.
On 7/19/2010 3:49 PM, n...@no6b.com wrote:
At 7/19/2010 09:30, you wrote:
On 7/19/2010 10:02 AM, Joe wrote:
S-Com can be a love/hate relationship. The older models did not have
an RS-232 interface, so you needed to keep track of everything
religiously on paper. BUT, they seemed to last
On 7/13/2010 11:20 PM, tracomm wrote:
Didn't one of the large radio dealers recently get a hefty fine for
programming radios on frequencies that the user did not have a license
for ??
CJD
Yup. Not the same situation as this, but close. And yes, it was a dealer
that has a national
On 7/14/2010 7:17 AM, Oz-in-DFW wrote:
On 7/13/2010 10:20 PM, tracomm wrote:
Didn't one of the large radio dealers recently get a hefty fine for
programming radios on frequencies that the user did not have a license
for ??
CJD
There are several examples of this. Not recent (15 os
On 7/7/2010 2:32 AM, Jack Chomley wrote:
Try the Polar Electronics Sector Coverage Panel Antenna model 375A. At 10dBd
it a little short on gain but.
Web site www.polarelectronics.com.au
Cheers,
Jack. VK4JRC
Except that 10 dBd is a little more then 2db gain over the 10 dBi he spec'd!
On 7/6/2010 3:21 PM, Mike Morris wrote:
Just an FYI reminder on FCC Docket NPRM 10-119 that totally
restructures GMRS and wipes it out as we know it.
Replies are due the 7th.
That's TOMORROW.
If you have a personal dog in that fight it's time to get moving.
Except that as Corwin pointed
On 6/28/2010 2:08 AM, John wrote:
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Scott Zimmermann3...@...
wrote:
Remember: For every law that is passed there is one less freedom we will
NEVER get back!!
There is a movement in this country (the US) that is anti-law and
anti-government which
On 6/10/2010 8:03 PM, Eric Lemmon wrote:
A Gas Tube Arrestor is better suited to telephone lines and RF coaxial
cables than to 120 VAC AC power lines. If used on AC power lines, when
fired, they will produce a bolted short and cause a great deal of current
to flow. This is not a good thing!
On 6/11/2010 7:45 AM, kerincom wrote:
Hi guys .I have the genuine software and programming cable and kg108 uhf
radios and I am trying to read and program them .The software is installed
on a Toshiba 700mhnz laptop running win98se .and when I try to communicate
with the radio it comes up with
I've had good luck with the GE Phoenix-S radios. Everything's available
on the back, including pins for toggling through the channels, and
resetting to ch 1 for starter-up/reference.
On 6/9/2010 11:31 PM, wa4moe wrote:
I'm searching for a transceiver to put into service for a link on
On 6/9/2010 7:08 AM, Joe wrote:
Mounting the Squalo vertically will probably give you some sort of wierd
directional pattern, not good for a repeater. I would opt for a ground
plane or base loaded mobile whip mounted over a set of 3 or 4 1/4 wave
ground radials.
What is your height
On 6/2/2010 11:03 AM, radio5...@aol.com wrote:
Anybody know a good source for a small quantity of of HT1000s?
I'm going to need somewhere between 50 and 200.
Thanks,
Will
50 to 200 is a small quantity? gee...
You are U.S. right?
Anyway, be VERY careful! Only the most recent HT1000's are
anymore, btw.)
On 5/19/2010 11:47 PM, Doug Bade wrote:
Someone ( WD8CHL JIM ) wrote some documentation up about using a
Co-linear from a higher freq on a lower freq... and angle of radiation
lowered as I recall but gain did not change... It actually can be
favorable depending on the site
On 5/21/2010 10:28 AM, kc0mlt wrote:
Hello all.
I am trying to figure out if the duplexer we have put together is up
to the task or not. Here is the situation. We have four cavities 6.5
dia. one is a vari-notch the others are simple reject cans. Two
rejects are on the TX side and one reject
I wasn't sure of the model number until Milt confirmed it. That repeater
does go down into the ham band very nicely, once you plug in crystals.
Re-rock it, and it tunes right down. I did one a number of years ago to
443.0-ish with no problem, and it's been running ever since.
Not a bad little
On 5/14/2010 12:09 PM, La Rue Communications wrote:
Got plenty of MaxTracs that should suit your needs if you are interested.
Contact me off-list for more details.
John Hymes
La Rue Communications
10 S. Aurora Street
Stockton, CA 95202
http://tinyurl.com/2dtngmn
John, Maxtracs are NOT
On 5/6/2010 10:35 AM, James wrote:
Hi Guys, We have been experimenting with building CTCSS Units using
the 567 Tone Chip and good components, i.e. Caps, multi turn pots
etc. The stability is not good in my opinion. We will set it to 107.2
and the next time you check it is off enough to where
On 5/5/2010 4:34 PM, wd5etd wrote:
Sorry for the dumb question but, I have a group trying to add a link
at one site for 5 repeaters. They are not trunked. What is the
cheapest way for them to share 1 antenna? They have a very good DB
antenna but, I did not think it necessary for them to buy
On 5/5/2010 12:33 PM, w7...@comcast.net wrote:
The pre-amps used in the Mitrex are the same as the MSR-2000! There are (2)
VHF range of pre-amps.
Should be lots of Mitrex Out There. Good Luck!
Tim W7TRH
Vashon Is. Wa.
Just a note (normally I wouldn't bother, but,) it's Mitrek. I
On 5/3/2010 12:08 PM, N1BUG wrote:
I'm guessing I am not the first to want to do this...
I want to use a UHF Micor for a link. I want to be able to stop the
PL encode immediately when a user unkeys, but I want the controller
to be able to hold the transmitter up (without PL tone) for sending
On 5/3/2010 1:08 PM, Jeff DePolo wrote:
I'm guessing I am not the first to want to do this...
I want to use a UHF Micor for a link. I want to be able to stop the
PL encode immediately when a user unkeys, but I want the controller
to be able to hold the transmitter up (without PL tone) for
On 4/27/2010 3:47 PM, afa5tp wrote:
Hello Group,
I am interested in an owners or Tech. manual for this radio, or just
some general info..Power, ease of programming,number of channels,
programmer KPT-10 available on eBay? Andy Brinkley's site says he
is out of proms for this radio!
In February, a large two-way radio dealer was issued a Notice Of
Violation (NOV) by the FCC for adding a frequency into radios that the
customer was not licensed for. The Notice stated that Section 90.427(b)
prohibits programming into a transmitter frequencies the licensee using
the
There is no school involved in this, nor is GMRS involved. This was a
Wal-Mart that a dealer programmed a business frequency into their radios
that they aren't licensed for.
n 4/29/2010 12:58 PM, kd6aaj wrote:
Strange, considering the GMRS can come with radios you buy, before
you even have
On 4/29/2010 1:10 PM, La Rue Communications wrote:
So if I had a UHF Saber, and programmed it to a Police frequency for
the purposes of TX EMERGENCY info only like 911, then its required to
have authorization? What if I was involved in a wreck and my radio
was the only thing in reach over my
arggh: after digging, here's the link to the actual NOV:
http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-296584A1.html
So, what's to stop someone from saying they programmed a freq for
emergency use only? Why else have the exception, unless you are expected to
have an unauthorized
w7...@comcast.net wrote:
To everyone in the group that replied to my query..A BIG
thank you! I believe I will keep the TK-630S as a Low Band
transciever. I has six ch., but is mechanically locked on ch. 1.
Thanks again for the GOOD advise.
You should be able to pull that lock off,
Ted Bleiman K9MDM - MDM Radio wrote:
since those radios wander from store to store having the frequency
programmed in as a convenience for the store personnel, I would not, find out
of the ordinary or particularly in violation of the FC C rules.
And that I would think is a legitimate
Well, it is micro-scum after all...;c}
On 4/28/2010 4:22 PM, Joe wrote:
I used Visio when I worked for Sprint/Nextel to document the floor plans
in the shelters. Things were pre-built and you just placed them on the
drawing. I hated it and did everything to get out of doing the task.
Joe
I duplexed a 75 W UHF Mitrek (not Mitrex...) nearly 15 years ago now.
It's still running fine, no in-cabinet desense. I have it running at abt
40-45W out with a fan on it (same fan for all that time too, btw).
Only issue is the power control pots seem a little flaky sometimes and
don't allow
Could also be a ground loop in the audio chain somewhere...start lifting
shields one at a time in the repeat audio chain and see if it goes away.
On 4/26/2010 10:36 AM, Eric Lemmon wrote:
Wade,
This sounds like a defective insulator or cable clamp sparking on a power
pole. Such interference
On 4/12/2010 3:00 PM, Scott Zimmerman wrote:
Those that were having issues, please try it again. I think I found the
bad code. (I'm not sure how it got there) I'd like a few people to check
and see if there are still issues.
Thanks,
Scott
Works good on my Firefox installs!
On 4/8/2010 4:26 PM, Nate Duehr wrote:
-- Mac OSX 10.6.3 and Safari 4.0.5 displays a full-screen warning
for the main page www.repeater-builder.com -- and allows you to
ignore warning or go back to the previously visited URL.
The warning box includes a link to Google's Safe Browsing website
On 4/8/2010 3:18 PM, La Rue Communications wrote:
Two questions on this unit.
1) Does anyone know the nomenclature for this? I have checked out
several different versions, including one that was built for
assignments dated after 3/10/02. I tried to check it out with it,
however, it doesnt
When I went to it with the latest Firfox, there was a link in the corner
that said something like 'ignore this warning'. click on it and it takes
you to the RB page with a red bar across the top. you can then click a
button and tell it that this page isn't a threat. Doesn't remember it
On 4/7/2010 2:28 AM, Nate Duehr wrote:
It almost sounds like you're talking about a trunked (multi-site)
system though, and I don't know of any trunked TDMA-based commercial
offerings in the 2-way radio market. Anyone else heard of one?
As Doug said, Harris (formerly M/A-Com) has Open Sky,
On 4/7/2010 11:22 AM, Nate Duehr wrote:
Yep all understood. My point was, I haven't seen any of those
DEPLOYED in a Public Safety environment yet, so I doubt his posting
was accurate about whatever system he's talking about being TDMA...
It's probably something else... P25 phase I, most
On 4/7/2010 11:47 AM, k7...@skybeam.com wrote:
Yes,
Tetra 4 slot TDMA over a 25Khz channel, Phase 1 P25 12.5Khz digital over a
single channel, NXDN Kenwood Icom FDMA 6.25 KHz digital and DMR standard
is TDMA digital over a 12.5khz channel witch is 6.25Khz. I wish Tetra was
here in the USA
On 4/7/2010 3:34 PM, k7...@skybeam.com wrote:
Yep, were all aware of the issues here in the USA. On my commercial TDMA
system I did a test 75miles away from the site with a portable and get back
into the site with no problem. Way out of the FCC license but works great.
Mike
I guess it
On 4/7/2010 4:31 PM, DCFluX wrote:
Lets get some pictures
Well, TLF would indicate 800 MHz...
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 1:12 PM, La Rue Communications
laruec...@gmail.comwrote:
Eric,
No results as the Parts Department says they're obsolete. Duh – tell me
something I dont know. I was not
On 4/5/2010 4:14 PM, Bruno Bouliane wrote:
I need to know the drive power for a Micor TLD1692A VHF PA. Any help
appreciated.
Bruno VE2VK/KD1XG.
Approx 400-750 mW.
become the standard, such that all other mfg had to pay
royalties to them, I would have a BIIIG problem with that, because it
gives that mfg a decidedly unfair advantage.
Jim WD8CHL
in many two-way radio products other than Motorola's?
(including directly competing products)
Joe M.
wd8chl wrote:
One good thing, in my book anyway, at least that's all DVSI does is
vocoders. They don't make radios. They don't make telephones. They don't
make channel banks or muxes. They just
On 4/1/2010 12:40 PM, Ken Arck wrote:
Thanks for the replies folks - some good ideas.
I should have clarified that the spare T-1500 cavities I have are BP
only. And my plan is to use it as a suck-out (notch) filter. That is
why I was talking about using a T in line with the receive line.
On 3/30/2010 7:24 AM, wb6dgn wrote:
Used to have to have it for land mobile but not any more. Still need
it for avionics and marine.
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, WD7F - John in
Tucsonw...@... wrote:
I was able to use my full name in a search and it came up, however,
I had a
On 3/29/2010 9:16 PM, Joe wrote:
I don't think I would use any kind of compound on RF connectors. I went
to the RFS aluminum CELLFLEX®Lite training and no compound was
recommended. Now, I'm not a fan of aluminum cable, but if it's going to
be used I would use only manufacturer recommended
On 3/24/2010 11:50 AM, La Rue Communications wrote:
So basically, in a sense - to rig this up with two alligator clips
and my Astron Power Supply, black/negative to the ground and
positive/red to the hot. Assuming this does not blow this mobile up,
I want to err on the side of caution before I
On 3/23/2010 6:05 AM, Mike Morris WA6ILQ wrote:
At 01:15 AM 03/23/10, you wrote:
Hello again.
I have a UHF MSR2000 up and running now. Most of my radios have the
reverse burst in them. But just about all ham grade radios do
not. Is there a way to get rid of the squelch crash from the
BTW, here's a link to a web site done by a DC comm's lawyer. Yes, he has
the 'disclaimers' not to use it as 'legal advice', but you can beturbut
it's right.
http://www.narrowbandinglaw.com/faqs.html
It's the second last question.
There is a link in the answer to the FCC order involved, but of
On 3/22/2010 10:25 AM, briansoehl wrote:
By the way..any Kenwood radios that have the sufix G (as in
TK-830G) are programmable for wide/narrow. The TK-830 is ONLY
capable of wideband. That's the reason I choose the TK-830G.
Yeah-I remember getting a bunch of 350G's. That was right as
On 3/18/2010 10:45 AM, Kevin Custer wrote:
tahrens301 wrote:
Hi all,
Working on a micor mobile to be used as a
repeater (only using the exciter/control board/PA).
Was going through it, and am only able to get
about 75 watts out of it with the exciter on 53.7.
The exciter is putting out
On 3/17/2010 1:45 AM, Don Kerouac wrote:
I have been burned by PayPal several times. The real reason they put the
hold on your checks or hold money owed to you has nothing to do with
your ratings and little to do with security. Basically, they control
billions of dollars in transactions ever
A slight word of caution: there were 3 versions of the Challengers: one
that used a DOS PC to program, one that used a Commodore 64 to program,
and one that used...I think either a TRS-80 or a Timex-Sinclair to
program. If you have one of the last 2, there were special modules for
interfacing
On 3/17/2010 12:45 PM, va...@securenet.net wrote:
I've been using Paypal since 1999 and have had absolutely no issues with them.
Actually on a sale overseas, they credited me the payment, then 10
days later debited me because they could not access the foreign bank,
then that was resolved and
On 3/17/2010 12:06 PM, skipp025 wrote:
50 cent plug...
When Narrow Banding is officially jammed down our throats... I
stock and sell the factory Narrow Band Kits for the TKR-720 and
the TKR-820 Repeaters...
Except for one thing-the x20 series radios weren't type accepted for
narrowband,
On 3/17/2010 12:11 PM, Gary Schafer wrote:
5/8 OD gives you 1.96 inches (5/8 x 3.14) of surface area. 1 inch copper
strap gives 2 inches of surface area.
2 inch copper strap gives you 4 inches surface area. Copper strap should be
less expensive than copper tubing.__,_._,__
Why would you use
On 3/17/2010 2:30 PM, va...@securenet.net wrote:
Well anyone who divulges their name and or password thru some phishing
email deserves to get caught.
No-I was talking about paypal/ebay having that info and selling it. Not
p/w's, but names, contact info, and at one point credit card numbers,
On 3/17/2010 3:47 PM, Gary Schafer wrote:
Here is another place to get copper strap even cheaper:
http://www.gacopper.com/
$1.05 per foot for 2 inch strap. (.012 thickness)
$1.70 per foot for 2 inch strap. (.022 thickness)
73
Gary K4FMX
Sorry-I don't have one of their stores in my
On 3/17/2010 2:45 PM, skipp025 wrote:
wd8chlwd8...@... wrote:
Except for one thing-the x20 series radios weren't type
accepted for narrowband, and the FCC has already said that
if that's the case, it won't fly.
Based on my direct in-person conversations with FCC Agents,
simply reducing
On 3/16/2010 4:37 AM, Ham-Radio wrote:
Ian,
The SM-4450-NE is 488 to 512. If you program 517 you are out of band for
that radio..
In fact, 517 is out of band period. The top of the LMR band is 512, so
if someone is asking you to program 517, they are asking you to do
something illegal.
On 3/16/2010 10:16 AM, kerincom wrote:
Hi .I in Australia and over here there are lmr frequencies over 512mhz and
the split is 10meg but if the radio is uncapable of the 517mhz then I will
have to replace them with a radio that can operate on those frequencies
Oh-woops-for some reason it
On 3/16/2010 4:38 PM, skipp025 wrote:
briansoehlbrianso...@... wrote:
Has anyone built a repeater out of 2 TK-830G's? I have 2
and want to build a repeater to replace one. These are
high spec radios designed for use in public safety and
I feel they'd make a good repeater.
Any help would
On 3/14/2010 11:41 PM, Paul Plack wrote:
How do these transmitters play at crowded sites? I've heard some accounts of
broadband noise problems for other tenants when high-power Glenayre equipment
went in...
73,
Paul, AE4KR
Having worked on them for over 10 years now, I can say they are
On 3/11/2010 11:10 AM, MCH wrote:
And how many of these TGs can be used in a repeater at the same time?
Thanks,
Joe M.
Outside of the ones that are dedicated to a specific purpose, like
interconnect, etc, all of them. Like any other trunked system.
most likely...
wd8chl wrote:
On 3/11/2010 11:10 AM, MCH wrote:
And how many of these TGs can be used in a repeater at the same time?
Thanks,
Joe M.
Outside of the ones that are dedicated to a specific purpose, like
interconnect, etc, all of them. Like any other trunked system.
Gary Schafer wrote:
Quarter wave length cables are the thing to use to couple the cavities
together at the antenna connection side of them.
The uhf cavity gets a cable that is a quarter wave length at the VHF
frequency and the VHF cavity gets a cable that is a quarter wave length at
the UHF
Ross Johnson wrote:
Thanks for the reply’s everyone. That cleared it up for sure. I will go
ahead and build the T to cavity cables to one electrical wave length for
the other band. And is that ¼ wave plus velocity factor of cable? Which
will be FSJ1.
Actually, it's 1/4-wave times the
On 3/8/2010 7:50 AM, Kevin Custer wrote:
We have been over this many times. If a system is balanced with a
receiver at -116 dBm running 50 watts of power, then it will be balanced
with 200 watts and a properly deployed preamp adding 6 dB of gain. The
added power level on the repeater
On 3/7/2010 5:44 PM, KE4ZDG wrote:
I figured out out. The local/remote switch on the back of the power supply
was on local. That disabled the 25V necessary to run the lights. Also,
turns out that all the fail lights' bulbs had blown. All is working now.
BTW, it's the old school gray
On 3/8/2010 3:22 PM, MCH wrote:
That's just it. Everyone likes to throw names out such as 'alligator' or
'elephant', but few people realize it's all relative to the station
*using* the repeater, too. What repeater may be an alligator for one
person is an elephant to another depending on
On 3/4/2010 8:56 AM, Leroy A. M. Baptiste wrote:
Hello all, I am having some interference problems,
it is coming from an FM transmitter on 94.500MHz,
and getting into the Amateur Radio repeater's
receiver on 146.1600MHz. It is not there all the
time, but when the repeater is keyed up, you can
...@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of wd8chl
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2010 10:21 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Interference
On 3/4/2010 8:56 AM, Leroy A. M. Baptiste wrote:
Hello all, I am having some interference
problems,
it is coming from an FM
Of wd8chl
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2010 10:21 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Interference
On 3/4/2010 8:56 AM, Leroy A. M. Baptiste wrote:
Hello all, I am having some interference
problems,
it is coming from an FM transmitter on
94.500MHz,
and getting
On 3/4/2010 1:54 PM, David Jordan wrote:
I just read the FCC order.I don't see a significant threat to amateur radio
UHF communications from this device.
It's operating on a ham band at more than flea power-maybe as much as
several watts. How can it NOT interfere? Trust me, it WILL! It
On 3/2/2010 2:02 PM, afa5tp wrote:
Hello
Thought you folks would be the ones to ask.
Am I going to be forced to purchase new marine VHF radios, or is the Marine
Band going to stay @ 5 kHz dev.?
Tim Hardy
W7TRH / AFA0TP
Vashon Is. Wa.
No. Narrowbanding only affects Part 90, and Marine is
On 3/2/2010 2:02 PM, afa5tp wrote:
Hello
Thought you folks would be the ones to ask.
Am I going to be forced to purchase new marine VHF radios, or is the Marine
Band going to stay @ 5 kHz dev.?
Tim Hardy
W7TRH / AFA0TP
Vashon Is. Wa.
No. Narrowbanding only affects Part 90, and Marine
really want you to upgrade, he should fork over most
of the money.
WD8CHL
of those can do it, but certainly any
made in the last 5 years I think will. Just a feature option upgrade.
WD8CHL
gregmrfs wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I have been tasked with programming and installing a UHF quantar by
my local amateur radio club. I got it on the air tonight. The P25
side appears to work fine, however the analogue side has some annoying
static at the end of the TX audio, just before the tails
skipp025 wrote:
Re: Caution to Group Members
Trojan from Yahoo Banner Advertisements
I actually believe I received the trojan from a banner ad
while setting up new book-marks for one of the radio/repeater
Groups I frequent.
Banner ads? I don't see no stinkin' banner ads
;c}
Gotta
thornwal wrote:
I was thinking about setting up a 2m repeater without duplexers. I
have lots of space (1,000+ft) at my home QTH (600ft HAAT) but I would
like to do it without a RF link. I was going to use a solar panel
12v battery for the RX side (out in the middle of our pasture) and
have
1 - 100 of 422 matches
Mail list logo
