-Builder] ACSSB
n0fpe wrote:
One thing to remember. Amatuers are NOT authorized to use ACSSB above
30mhz. Please check part 97 for the exact modes we are able to use.
heck if we were there would be tons of ACSSB repeaters already modified
into the ham band.
I don't believe that comment
: [Repeater-Builder] ACSSB
Could you please provide a rule number to back this up?
Linear Modulation and ACSSB share 4K00J3E as the emission designator.
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 5:34 AM, n0fpe n0...@cox.net wrote:
One thing to remember. Amatuers are NOT authorized to use ACSSB above 30mhz.
Please
@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] ACSSB
Interesting thing about part 97. It is written differently than any other
part of the rules. In most of the rules they tell you what you can do and if
it isn't specifically spelled out then you can't do it.
In part 97 it is the other way
One thing to remember. Amatuers are NOT authorized to use ACSSB above 30mhz.
Please check part 97 for the exact modes we are able to use.
heck if we were there would be tons of ACSSB repeaters already modified into
the ham band.
, 2009 7:34 AM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] ACSSB
One thing to remember. Amatuers are NOT authorized to use ACSSB above
30mhz. Please check part 97 for the exact modes we are able to use.
heck if we were there would be tons of ACSSB repeaters already modified
into the ham band
Rev. Robert P. Chrysafis wrote:
wonder why the fcc does not allow acssb above 30 mhz on the ham bands? seems
to me they would want to promote more efficient modes through all the ham
bands.
another interesting thing would be to see 2 meter repeaters go to 2 or 3 mhz
splits and employ
n0fpe wrote:
One thing to remember. Amatuers are NOT authorized to use ACSSB above 30mhz.
Please check part 97 for the exact modes we are able to use.
heck if we were there would be tons of ACSSB repeaters already modified into
the ham band.
I don't believe that comment on legality. But no,
Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2009 5:34 AM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] ACSSB
One thing to remember. Amatuers are NOT authorized to use ACSSB above 30mhz.
Please check part 97 for the exact modes we are able to use.
heck if we were there would be tons of ACSSB repeaters already
On Thursday 12 November 2009 07:34:08 n0fpe wrote:
One thing to remember. Amatuers are NOT authorized to use ACSSB above 30mhz.
Please check part 97 for the exact modes we are able to use.
heck if we were there would be tons of ACSSB repeaters already modified into
the ham band.
No, thats
At 11/12/2009 07:47, you wrote:
n0fpe wrote:
One thing to remember. Amatuers are NOT authorized to use ACSSB above
30mhz. Please check part 97 for the exact modes we are able to use.
heck if we were there would be tons of ACSSB repeaters already modified
into the ham band.
I don't believe
Could you please provide a rule number to back this up?
Linear Modulation and ACSSB share 4K00J3E as the emission designator.
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 5:34 AM, n0fpe n0...@cox.net wrote:
One thing to remember. Amatuers are NOT authorized to use ACSSB above 30mhz.
Please check part 97 for the
basically as the title states. i have never heard of acssb outside of 220-222
mhz.
seems to me acssb was a good idea and was curious as to why the ham community
has not picked up on it for mobile HF SSB use.
seems to me having the benefits of SSB without the hassle of messing with a
clarifier
The demise of ACSSB in our area was the overall
range was limited to poor sensitivity relative to
a similarly situated uhf repeater.. Typical
sensitivity of the mobiles was .4-.5~.6uv or so
compared to sub .2uv on uhf and vhf fm mobiles
that were readily available.. Sound quality did not
I was playing with the ideas of making adapters, but it is supprisingly
difficult to throw audio exactly 90 degrees out of phase over a broad
frequency range.
Anyway it might be practical to adopt the pilot tone to an HF radio. I'd
transmit a 100Hz pilot tone, or something that would go through
14 matches
Mail list logo
