, wb8vlc mas...@cableone.net wrote:
From: wb8vlc mas...@cableone.net
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: 2M Vertical Dipoles
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Date: Saturday, August 29, 2009, 9:39 PM
I found some Plans on this groups page for a home made 4 pole
array
for a while. Then see if the plastic
gets hot. If it does, you don't want to use it for RF.
73 and aloha, Eric KH6CQ
--- On Wed, 8/12/09, AJ aj.grant...@... wrote:
From: AJ aj.grant...@...
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: 2M Vertical Dipoles
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Date
Does really PVC absorb or RF or just act as a dielectric?
The reason I ask is I'm looking at encasing an antenna project for the sake
of weatherproofing and PVC would fit the bill rather easily.
73,
AJ, K6LOR
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 9:49 AM, AA8K73 GMail aa8...@gmail.com wrote:
AJ, if you
some does ,test a piece in the microwave
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
From: aj.grant...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 09:05:55 -0600
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: 2M Vertical Dipoles
Does really PVC absorb or RF or just act
--
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
From: aj.grant...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 09:05:55 -0600
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: 2M Vertical Dipoles
Does really PVC absorb or RF or just act as a dielectric?
The reason I ask is I'm looking at encasing an antenna project
Nuke a test piece and see if it gets hot.
Chris
Kb0wlf
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of AJ
Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 10:06 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: 2M Vertical Dipoles
10:13 AM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: 2M Vertical Dipoles
The product I'm looking at specifically is branded as non metallic rigid PVC
conduit sold locally at Lowes:
http://www.carlon.com/Product_CarlonPlus4080.html
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 9:10 AM, Barry ate
, 8/12/09, AJ aj.grant...@gmail.com wrote:
From: AJ aj.grant...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: 2M Vertical Dipoles
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wednesday, August 12, 2009, 10:05 AM
Does really PVC absorb or RF or just act as a dielectric
I see that YAHOO added spaces to the links in my last post. Remove the spaces
to make the links work.
73 - Jim W5ZIT
--- On Wed, 8/12/09, Jim Brown w5...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: Jim Brown w5...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: 2M Vertical Dipoles
To: Repeater-Builder
--- On Wed, 8/12/09, AJ aj.grant...@gmail.com wrote:
From: AJ aj.grant...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: 2M Vertical Dipoles
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wednesday, August 12, 2009, 5:05 AM
Does really PVC absorb or RF or just act
Hi Joe,
Guess we are all telling our age.
I had WR1AIK in 1975/76. Remember it took a note to my
congressman to get the license assigned - seemed to take
forever!
I was in the AF in Northern Maine at the time.
cu
Tim W5FN
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Joe k1ike_m...@... wrote:
If you want Laird / Antenex does make a 2 and 4 dipole array for the 2 meter
band the part number is YDA1362 for a 2 dipole 136-150 antenna and YDA1364 for
the 4 dipole antenna. They don't come with a mast pipe like the cushcraft
antennas from long ago. They have a YDA2004 for 200-225 MHZ
and
On this same topic of the mast-less Antennex/Laird dipole arrays, has anyone
attempted to top mount these from a fiberglass mast to minimize interaction
with the normal steel pole? I have quite a few surplus fiberglass poles left
that would likely work, even for side mounting on 1/2 wave spacing
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 9:27 AM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: 2M Vertical Dipoles
On this same topic of the mast-less Antennex/Laird dipole arrays, has anyone
attempted to top mount these from a fiberglass mast to minimize
Paul Plack wrote:
If you mount the array on a non-conductive pole, won't you then have
to model the effects of interaction with the outside of the coax
shields of the feedline harness that would normally be insignificant
when attached to the side of a conductive pole?
Be careful here
Hmm, that would make sense... Back to the drawing board :)
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Kevin Custer kug...@kuggie.com wrote:
Paul Plack wrote:
If you mount the array on a non-conductive pole, won't you then have to
model the effects of interaction with the outside of the coax shields
What was the spacing between the tower legs at the mounting location of the
dipoles in your model?
Allan Crites WA9ZZU
-- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, n...@... wrote:
At 8/9/2009 05:47, you wrote:
As frequency decreases, so does the importance of keeping the dipoles
exactly
At 8/9/2009 16:41, you wrote:
What was the spacing between the tower legs at the mounting location of
the dipoles in your model?
No tower. Only the rooftop-mounted mast 4 dipoles, which is what I was
using at the time.
Bob NO6B
Comtech I believe has the modeling for antenna side mounting from tower and
it's affect on gain...
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 7:14 PM, n...@no6b.com wrote:
At 8/9/2009 16:41, you wrote:
What was the spacing between the tower legs at the mounting location of
the dipoles in your model?
No
19 matches
Mail list logo
