Re: [Repeater-Builder] Thank You - Interference Help - WTB

2009-03-26 Thread Jim Brown
sure that many of the CA repeaters using this band plan operate without any problems, so it is a workable band plan, proved many times. 73 - Jim  W5ZIT --- On Wed, 3/25/09, n...@no6b.com n...@no6b.com wrote: From: n...@no6b.com n...@no6b.com Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Thank You - Interference

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Thank You - Interference Help - WTB

2009-03-26 Thread Nate Duehr
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com [mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Jim Brown Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 11:28 AM To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Thank You - Interference Help - WTB In the early '70s I coordinated a repeater

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Thank You - Interference Help - WTB

2009-03-26 Thread Jim Brown
] Thank You - Interference Help - WTB To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Date: Thursday, March 26, 2009, 5:18 PM Jim, your example does not have the inputs on top of the outputs.  You have outputs side by side 15 kHz apart.  That’s common in a lot of places (including

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Thank You - Interference Help - WTB

2009-03-26 Thread Don Kupferschmidt
in the area. Good choice of words . . . . sheesh, wimpy wimpy wimpy. Don, KD9PT - Original Message - From: Nate Duehr To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:18 PM Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Thank You - Interference Help - WTB Jim, your example

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Thank You - Interference Help - WTB

2009-03-25 Thread wd8chl
Bob Ricci wrote: I'm going to combine several issues into one email. With the help of this group and individuals like Bob - NO6B, I finally have our first repeater online. It sounds great but of course needs work. We currently have an interference issue from a repeaters whose output is

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Thank You - Interference Help - WTB

2009-03-25 Thread Nate Duehr
Why is their output 15 KHz away from your input? Is someone upside-down? Sounds like a bad coordination... even 100 miles away, if one or both ends are on high sites. A 5 KHz deviated signal doesn't really fit into 15 KHz of channel space, this is well-known. But why is their output on top of

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Thank You - Interference Help - WTB

2009-03-25 Thread JOHN MACKEY
-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Thank You - Interference Help - WTB Why is their output 15 KHz away from your input? Is someone upside-down? Sounds like a bad coordination... even 100 miles away, if one or both ends are on high sites. A 5 KHz deviated signal doesn't

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Thank You - Interference Help - WTB

2009-03-25 Thread Paul Plack
-Builder] Thank You - Interference Help - WTB Why is their output 15 KHz away from your input? Is someone upside-down? Sounds like a bad coordination... even 100 miles away, if one or both ends are on high sites.

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Thank You - Interference Help - WTB

2009-03-25 Thread no6b
At 3/25/2009 14:19, you wrote: Why is their output 15 KHz away from your input? Is someone upside-down? No, that is our bandplan, is by design. Sounds like a bad coordination... even 100 miles away, if one or both ends are on high sites. Nope. We routinely place repeaters less than 50 miles

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Thank You - Interference Help - WTB

2009-03-25 Thread no6b
At 3/25/2009 15:35, you wrote: Back in the day, a channel was 30 kHz wide. When they were split to meet demand, California was not the only coordination jurisdiction which chose to put the half channels upside down. From what I gather from the old-timers, it was easier to protect your input

[Repeater-Builder] Thank You - Interference Help - WTB

2009-03-24 Thread Bob Ricci
I'm going to combine several issues into one email. With the help of this group and individuals like Bob - NO6B, I finally have our first repeater online. It sounds great but of course needs work. We currently have an interference issue from a repeaters whose output is 15 Khz away from our