On 14 January 2012 09:27, Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org wrote:
On 01/13/2012 09:22 PM, William Warren wrote:
That doesn't explain the sudden shift in marking BZ private by default
for an open source product. Ever since the current CEO came in RH has
been getting more and ore
On 01/13/2012 09:22 PM, William Warren wrote:
That doesn't explain the sudden shift in marking BZ private by default
for an open source product. Ever since the current CEO came in RH has
been getting more and ore secretive and this goes against the spirit of
Open Source.
is that really the
List,
I don't know how much I can go into the details but I can assure you,
being apart of GSS, the major concern has been with customer privacy. I
would take the suggestions from this list of contacting support or your
TAM and seeing if they can give you the information in your case.
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 5:27 AM, Bob Arendt r...@rincon.com wrote:
On 01/12/2012 04:55 PM, Tim wrote:
Once upon a time, William Warren
hescominsoon@**emmanuelcomputerconsulting.comhescomins...@emmanuelcomputerconsulting.com
** said:
RedHat used to leave its bugzilla mostly open. I am
On 01/13/2012 04:22 PM, William Warren wrote:
That doesn't explain the sudden shift in marking BZ private by default
for an open source product. Ever since the current CEO came in RH has
been getting more and ore secretive and this goes against the spirit of
Open Source.
There is a very
On 01/13/2012 01:22 PM, William Warren wrote:
That doesn't explain the sudden shift in marking BZ private by default
for an open source product. Ever since the current CEO came in RH has
been getting more and ore secretive and this goes against the spirit
of Open Source.
Mr Arendt provided a
RedHat used to leave its bugzilla mostly open. I am seeing more and
more closed bugzilla entries even to registered accounts. Is this part
of trying to hide things from oracle?
___
rhelv6-list mailing list
rhelv6-list@redhat.com
, January 12, 2012 4:31 PM
To: rhelv6-list@redhat.com
Subject: [rhelv6-list] Restricting bugzillas
RedHat used to leave its bugzilla mostly open. I am seeing more and more
closed bugzilla entries even to registered accounts. Is this part of trying to
hide things from oracle
Subject: Re: [rhelv6-list] Restricting bugzillas
In my opinion, even closing the KB by Red Hat, I mean you need to login to
access the articles, was and is not good. If not open source, Linux and GNU,
probably there would not be Red Hat today. Saying that they created Fedora to
give something back
Once upon a time, William Warren hescomins...@emmanuelcomputerconsulting.com
said:
RedHat used to leave its bugzilla mostly open. I am seeing more and
more closed bugzilla entries even to registered accounts. Is this part
of trying to hide things from oracle?
I think it is more that they
Once upon a time, William Warren
hescomins...@emmanuelcomputerconsulting.com said:
RedHat used to leave its bugzilla mostly open. I am seeing more and
more closed bugzilla entries even to registered accounts. Is this part
of trying to hide things from oracle?
I think it is more that they
On 01/12/2012 11:55 PM, Tim wrote:
I'm with Chris on this one. I don't think RedHat are making BZ entries
private to hide bugs from competitors. I suspect it's because most of
the bugs are logged by customers and contain private customer data that
the customer would prefer not to be made
12 matches
Mail list logo
