Now that I've looked at this a bit I have a couple more things that I
would like to suggest ...
1. If the template is required (or tied to a specific action in the
upcoming code) then we don't show the Name, Link, and Description
elements as form fields. Instead we just provide targeted help
On 3/23/07, Allen Gilliland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now that I've looked at this a bit I have a couple more things that I
would like to suggest ...
1. If the template is required (or tied to a specific action in the
upcoming code) then we don't show the Name, Link, and Description
elements as
Dave wrote:
On 3/19/07, Allen Gilliland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
4. I think the content-type control should work differently than you
described. I think the only 2 options should be automatic and
manual. So for automatic content-type it would work exactly how it
does now where we ask the
I agree with most of these changes, but here's a few things I don't
really like ...
1. On the templates list page I don't think we need the column for the
content-type. The overwhelming majority of users don't care about
manually managing the content type for their templates so I think we
On 3/19/07, Allen Gilliland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree with most of these changes, but here's a few things I don't
really like ...
Good feedback. I agree with all of these changes.
Anybody else have feedback on this?
- Dave
1. On the templates list page I don't think we need the
Does this work depend on groovy, ruby, etc?
-Elias
Allen Gilliland wrote:
I agree with most of these changes, but here's a few things I don't
really like ...
1. On the templates list page I don't think we need the column for the
content-type. The overwhelming majority of users don't care
On 3/19/07, Elias Torres [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does this work depend on groovy, ruby, etc?
No.
Apart from the UI tweaks, all I'm doing is adding a way for users to
specify for each Template:
1) the template language used by the page and
2) the content-type generated by a template.
Roller
One additional point that I would definitely like to see covered are
template pages that require user authentication.
- James
Dave wrote:
On 3/19/07, Elias Torres [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does this work depend on groovy, ruby, etc?
No.
Apart from the UI tweaks, all I'm doing is adding a
On 3/19/07, Allen Gilliland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
4. I think the content-type control should work differently than you
described. I think the only 2 options should be automatic and
manual. So for automatic content-type it would work exactly how it
does now where we ask the appserver for the
