Thank you!
73 de Jeff
On May 4, 2009, at 12:39 PM, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
RPM Package Manager, CVS Repository
http://rpm5.org/cvs/
Server: rpm5.org Name: Per Øyvind Karlsen
Root:
you're welcome :)
2009/5/4 Jeff Johnson n3...@mac.com
Thank you!
73 de Jeff
On May 4, 2009, at 12:39 PM, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
RPM Package Manager, CVS Repository
http://rpm5.org/cvs/
Server:
Any help filling in the lexical patterns here is appreciated. Feel
free to do whatever you wish, including adding additional character
class primitives as macros, rpmExpand() is a recursive expansion.
Meanwhile, lemme see if I can untorque the more egregious side-effects
from the current parser.
You'ld think that saving unix file paths in an rpmdb would be rather
straightforward.
Well its not. I'm almost annoyed enough at the mess to attempt a
cleanup, but
I got other things to do atm.
Originally there was a tag index called RPMTAG_FILENAMES and life
was gud.
But then for
Jeff Johnson wrote:
I have multip[le issues with changes like this:
1) the patch uses envvar's
Using envvar's forces remote rpm to carry an environment along
in order to run remote commands, and largely forces remote
execution with
shell. There are many times/places that
On Apr 10, 2008, at 11:09 AM, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
På Torsdag 10 april 2008 , 13:39:57 skrev Anders F Björklund:
Jeff Johnson wrote:
I have multip[le issues with changes like this:
1) the patch uses envvar's
Using envvar's forces remote rpm to carry an environment along
På Torsdag 10 april 2008 , 13:39:57 skrev Anders F Björklund:
Jeff Johnson wrote:
I have multip[le issues with changes like this:
1) the patch uses envvar's
Using envvar's forces remote rpm to carry an environment along
in order to run remote commands, and largely forces remote
På Torsdag 10 april 2008 , 17:19:38 skrev Jeff Johnson:
On Apr 10, 2008, at 11:09 AM, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
På Torsdag 10 april 2008 , 13:39:57 skrev Anders F Björklund:
Jeff Johnson wrote:
I have multip[le issues with changes like this:
1) the patch uses envvar's
Using envvar's
On Apr 10, 2008, at 11:38 AM, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
På Torsdag 10 april 2008 , 17:19:38 skrev Jeff Johnson:
On Apr 10, 2008, at 11:09 AM, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
På Torsdag 10 april 2008 , 13:39:57 skrev Anders F Björklund:
Jeff Johnson wrote:
I have multip[le issues with changes
On Thursday, 10 April 2008, at 09:49:16 (+0200),
Per ?yvind Karlsen wrote:
+%_initrddir%{_sysconfdir}/rc.d/init.d
Can anyone explain to me why this macro is initrddir when
/etc/init.d and /etc/rc.d/init.d have absolutely nothing whatsoever to
do with the initial RAM disk?
On Apr 10, 2008, at 12:37 PM, Michael Jennings wrote:
On Thursday, 10 April 2008, at 09:49:16 (+0200),
Per ?yvind Karlsen wrote:
+%_initrddir %{_sysconfdir}/rc.d/init.d
Can anyone explain to me why this macro is initrddir when
/etc/init.d and /etc/rc.d/init.d have absolutely
På Torsdag 10 april 2008 , 17:55:05 skrev Jeff Johnson:
Not true. There are already Packaging Policy Police and you have
chosen a macro
name that falls within their claimed territority, and are going to
attempt to populate
that macro with values that are generally useful, rather than
On Apr 10, 2008, at 1:08 PM, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
På Torsdag 10 april 2008 , 17:55:05 skrev Jeff Johnson:
Not true. There are already Packaging Policy Police and you have
chosen a macro
name that falls within their claimed territority, and are going to
attempt to populate
that macro with
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 12:37 PM, Michael Jennings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday, 10 April 2008, at 09:49:16 (+0200),
Per ?yvind Karlsen wrote:
+%_initrddir%{_sysconfdir}/rc.d/init.d
Can anyone explain to me why this macro is initrddir when
/etc/init.d and
Jeff Johnson wrote:
Can anyone explain to me why this macro is initrddir when
/etc/init.d and /etc/rc.d/init.d have absolutely nothing
whatsoever to
do with the initial RAM disk? Shouldn't it be initdir?
Hysterical accident is what my bleached neurons remember.
Either Mandriva or PLD was
It was Mandriva, says the changelog:
http://rpm5.org/cvs/filediff?f=rpm/platform.inv1=2.6v2=2.7
Couldn't find their original changelog,
seems like it was reset at 2005 or so ?
Didn't look hard enough:
* Mon Aug 21 2000 Frederic Lepied [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3.0.5-11mdk
- added _initrddir macro to
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008, Jeff Johnson wrote:
- jbj: fix: permit #%patchN comments by forcing single line expansion.
Ah, cool. I knew that there will be more practical use cases for
%{shrink:..}. Nice.
Ralf S. Engelschall
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007, Mark Hatle wrote:
Is TEMPORARY TABLE something special? I knew about the :memory:
before, but not the other.
Excerpt from http://www.sqlite.org/lang_createtable.html:
If the TEMP or TEMPORARY keyword occurs in between CREATE
and TABLE then the table that is
For the case w/o db3 header being available, there is the db_emu.h
file. Put that value in there, and it is supposed to be picked up if db
items are not defined.
--Mark
Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007, Mark Hatle wrote:
Is TEMPORARY TABLE something special? I knew about the
Ahh you just reminded me of a bug. I'm not sure how to fix this using
the dynamic values.. But basically, Depends can't be in the _dbi_tags
if you are using sqlite. If you notice in the fragment below, on db3
it's setup as a temporary private database used for single-run
optimization. On the
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007, Jeff Johnson wrote:
[...]
If you want to be using sqlite3 instead of Berkeley DB, then please
state directly.
Sorry, Jeff, at this time I still cannot state anything directly here
because I've still not even decided what my final targets are exactly.
I'm still in the
Is TEMPORARY TABLE something special? I knew about the :memory:
before, but not the other.
Otherwise this looks good to me. It may even speed things up slightly.
--Mark
Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007, Mark Hatle wrote:
Ahh you just reminded me of a bug. I'm not sure how
22 matches
Mail list logo
