In regard to: Re: [CVS] RPM: rpm-5_4: rpm/scripts/ vpkg-provides2.sh,...:
Certainly lots of the scripts could use an overhaul.
Most shells SHOULD be POSIX compliant: but I will defer to Tim's opinion
on portability, there may still be some ancient shells in use somewhere.
I no longer have
On Apr 2, 2015, at 5:29 PM, devzero2000 wrote:
Il 02/Apr/2015 18:43 Jeffrey Johnson n3...@me.com ha scritto:
On Apr 2, 2015, at 12:11 PM, devzero2000 wrote:
Il 02/Apr/2015 17:39 Jeffrey Johnson n3...@me.com ha scritto:
Um ... was there actually a problem being solved here?
Il 02/Apr/2015 18:43 Jeffrey Johnson n3...@me.com ha scritto:
On Apr 2, 2015, at 12:11 PM, devzero2000 wrote:
Il 02/Apr/2015 17:39 Jeffrey Johnson n3...@me.com ha scritto:
Um ... was there actually a problem being solved here?
Some of these scripts (like rpm2cpio.sh) are vitally
Um ... was there actually a problem being solved here?
Some of these scripts (like rpm2cpio.sh) are vitally
important and have been posted publicly like here
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/18787375/how-do-i-extract-the-contents-of-an-rpm/25986787#25986787
and integrated into other
On Apr 2, 2015, at 12:11 PM, devzero2000 wrote:
Il 02/Apr/2015 17:39 Jeffrey Johnson n3...@me.com ha scritto:
Um ... was there actually a problem being solved here?
Some of these scripts (like rpm2cpio.sh) are vitally
important and have been posted publicly like here
In regard to: Re: [CVS] RPM: rpm-5_4: rpm/scripts/ vpkg-provides2.sh,...:
The aim is to modernize a little these shells. The comment should be clear.
Why? Was there something broken that you've fixed?
Because the change you've made actually makes them less portable.
Tim
--
Tim Mooney
