Eric MSP Veith wrote:
Otherwise one would expect it to work on a basic rpm5.org install,
such as the one (devtool macosx) where I tried it and failed... :-)
Well, I'm not quite clear how this is handled on the list. Jeff on
some
pourposes wrote that this or that is a vendor-specific
Eric MSP Veith wrote:
I've been trying to adopt this to my own projects. (I actually just
began
re-formatting my old specfiles.) What I found out is that it really
works in
the script parts, a thing that broke the spec file parser before.
However,
the description part still doesn't seem to
Saravanan Shanmugham (sarvi) wrote:
I pulled xar 1.5.2 from the RPM5, applied the xar 1.5.2.patch.
And tried compiling it.
...
lib/libxar.a(archive.static.o)(.text+0x2c5d): In function
`xar_unserialize':
lib/archive.c:1346: undefined reference to `xmlDictCleanup'
Your libxml2 is too old
Miller, Vincent (Rick) wrote:
I had not loaded berkely-db because I thought I had read somewhere that there
was a bundled berkley-db with RPM5. I have since loaded Berkley-DB 5.1.x
from FreeBSD ports and was able to get the compile to move along further.
There used to be a bundled version,
Miller, Vincent (Rick) wrote:
I'm compiling RPM 5.3.11 on FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE and encountered an error that
is more fundamental than previous errors. dbconvert.c makes calls to
various hto*() functions, which are not defined in FreeBSD's libc.
See http://rpm5.org/cvs/chngview?cn=16081 for
Miller, Vincent (Rick) wrote:
The BSD and Mac ports are currently using 5.2.1, that is the pre-ACID RPM:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/archivers/rpm5/
https://trac.macports.org/browser/trunk/dports/sysutils/rpm52/
I would be happy with the FreeBSD port of RPM. I did do an
I would be happy with the FreeBSD port of RPM. I did do an install of it
and it did not install the rpmbuild binary. This was one of the main
reasons for downloading and installing from source...
Unlike the Debian package, the FreeBSD port *does* install the
rpmbuild binary. [...]
My
Miller, Vincent (Rick) wrote:
Hi Anders,
I installed sysutils/file and received an error message indicating that
file 5.3 supports only version 7 magic files and that the one installed
was version 8. Perhaps this is the reason that RPM 5.2.1 did not install
sysutils/file?
You'll need to
Jeffrey Johnson:
[...]
The .src.rpm format is somewhat troublesome to port, but bundled
rpm2cpio.sh and extracted the tarball in a post-extract {} step.
[...]
But if it gets to be too big a hassle, I'll pop out the tar ball and included
detached signature whenever you wish.
Basically
Henri Gomez wrote:
Hi to all,
I success in building rpm 5.4.7 on OSX (from tarball)
First step was to build and install bee crypt 4.2.1, popt 1.1.6,
db-5.3.15, sqlite 3.7.11, pcre 8.30, zlib 1.2.6 libraries under
/usr/local (nothing in)
Great! The only thing I added after that was
Henri Gomez wrote:
Not sure what you ask here: you want a rpm-mac mailing list?
Nope, I just want to see if there is other guys interested with RPM on OSX.
Frankly, I'm borred to rebuild Brew/MacPorts stuff and I'm not alone.
I just want to be able to set a package repository and use yum or
Rick Miller wrote:
What version of RPM?
I *think* its 5.2.x, but not 100% sure. I don't have access to the
host today and can let you know tomorrow. It was installed from the
FreeBSD ports collection for 8.2-RELEASE.
That would be 5.2.1.
Rick Miller wrote:
But even with all the patching, the only yum use is for handling
RPM packages for Linux on FreeBSD (like for the linux emulator).
It has too many hardcoded assumptions to work for native packages.
There is no real interest in having it portable to other systems.
I left
Nicholas Chubrich wrote:
From lsbom it looks like there were some things in /private once, but no
more. The Python packages are also gone. The Perl package is still there,
and I wonder if I should leave it alone or get rid of it (would there be any
non-RPM dependencies it might break?).
Jacques Knipper wrote:
> Indeed I'm talking about v5.4.15.
> I didn't try with the --rpmdbdebug yet but I will, thanks.
> The problem happen with every rpm.
> I am able to rebuild our rpms with the rpmbuild, but I cannot install them,
> an I think it's because of an issue with Berkeley DB.
Jacques Knipper wrote:
> I already know that brew and rpm are not officially supported on latest
> version of osx for now...
Whatever official support is, I don't think it is happening on *any* version of
OS X. But that particular system version is not even released yet, for another
week or
16 matches
Mail list logo
