Re: RPM sqlite3 support

2016-01-12 Thread Jeffrey Johnson
> On Jan 12, 2016, at 6:39 PM, Tim Mooney wrote: > > In regard to: Re: RPM sqlite3 support, Jeffrey Johnson said (at 4:40pm on...: > >>> With Oracle's license change on BDB 6.x (or 12.x, or whatever they're >>> calling it) to AGPL, does that impact rpm5's long-term use of

Re: RPM sqlite3 support

2016-01-12 Thread Jeffrey Johnson
> On Jan 12, 2016, at 11:25 AM, Jate Sujjavanich wrote: > > I am using rpm 5.4.9 as my package manager on an embedded system, and I am > running into some bottlenecks with the Berkeley database. I am using an SD > Card as my root file system. > > The rpm transactions from

Re: RPM sqlite3 support

2016-01-12 Thread Jeffrey Johnson
> On Jan 12, 2016, at 3:06 PM, Tim Mooney wrote: > > In regard to: Re: RPM sqlite3 support, Jeffrey Johnson said (at 12:46pm on...: > >> The sqlite3 code (and support) in rpm5 was abandoned in favor of >> Berkeley DB ACID transactional support quite some years ago > >

Re: RPM sqlite3 support

2016-01-12 Thread Jate Sujjavanich
Performance was my whole rationale for trying sqlite3. I do have some power backup, so I will try reducing the fsyncs. On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 12:03 PM, Mark Hatle wrote: > > Note, sqlite support was -much- slower then BerkeleyDB. It was only added > to > deal with

Re: RPM sqlite3 support

2016-01-12 Thread Mark Hatle
On 1/12/16 10:25 AM, Jate Sujjavanich wrote: > I am using rpm 5.4.9 as my package manager on an embedded system, and I am > running into some bottlenecks with the Berkeley database. I am using an SD > Card > as my root file system. > > The rpm transactions from a kernel upgrade take an hour or

Re: RPM sqlite3 support

2016-01-12 Thread Tim Mooney
In regard to: Re: RPM sqlite3 support, Jeffrey Johnson said (at 12:46pm on...: The sqlite3 code (and support) in rpm5 was abandoned in favor of Berkeley DB ACID transactional support quite some years ago I've been meaning to ask about this for a while, and this provides a good segue... With

Re: RPM sqlite3 support

2016-01-12 Thread Mark Hatle
On 1/12/16 2:06 PM, Tim Mooney wrote: > In regard to: Re: RPM sqlite3 support, Jeffrey Johnson said (at 12:46pm on...: > >> The sqlite3 code (and support) in rpm5 was abandoned in favor of >> Berkeley DB ACID transactional support quite some years ago > > I've been meaning to ask about this for

Re: RPM sqlite3 support

2016-01-12 Thread Tim Mooney
In regard to: Re: RPM sqlite3 support, Jeffrey Johnson said (at 4:40pm on...: With Oracle's license change on BDB 6.x (or 12.x, or whatever they're calling it) to AGPL, does that impact rpm5's long-term use of BDB? No impact for the project, but there’s always users who want/need different.

RPM sqlite3 support

2016-01-12 Thread Jate Sujjavanich
I am using rpm 5.4.9 as my package manager on an embedded system, and I am running into some bottlenecks with the Berkeley database. I am using an SD Card as my root file system. The rpm transactions from a kernel upgrade take an hour or so. Using the --stats option, I found that rpm was spending