:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fenderbosch,
Eric
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2008 11:46 AM
To: Rules Users List
Subject: RE: [rules-users] Drools 4 poor performance scaling?
We are having a similar problem, although our fact count is much higher.
Performance seems pretty good and consistent until
To: Rules Users List
Subject: RE: [rules-users] Drools 4 poor performance scaling?
FYI for the group. We seem to have solved our performance problem.
I'll describe our problem space a bit some people have some context. We
load up about 1200 Jobs with about 3000 Stops and about 1500 Vehicles
on with accumulation on the fly, at least with our facts
and rules.
I'll put an entry on the wiki as well.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fenderbosch,
Eric
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2008 11:46 AM
To: Rules Users List
Subject: RE: [rules-users] Drools 4 poor
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fenderbosch,
Eric
Sent: 09 July 2008 14:41
To: Rules Users List
Subject: RE: [rules-users] Drools 4 poor performance scaling?
FYI for the group. We seem to have solved our performance problem.
I'll describe our problem space a bit some people
We are having a similar problem, although our fact count is much higher.
Performance seems pretty good and consistent until about 400k facts,
then performance degrades significantly. Part of the degradation is
from bigger and more frequent GCs, but not all of it.
Time to load first 100k facts:
Fenderbosch, Eric wrote:
We are having a similar problem, although our fact count is much higher.
Performance seems pretty good and consistent until about 400k facts,
then performance degrades significantly. Part of the degradation is
from bigger and more frequent GCs, but not all of it.
If
) almost 5 seconds.
Ron
Subject: RE: [rules-users] Drools 4 poor performance scaling?
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 11:46:15 -0400
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: rules-users@lists.jboss.org
We are having a similar problem, although our fact count is much higher
another
go. Any target on a 5.0 release date? We're looking to go live in
production in about 1 month.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Proctor
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2008 12:39 PM
To: Rules Users List
Subject: Re: [rules-users] Drools
A small update. I ran the example below starting with 90 rules and running
down to 1. The execution time remains the same so I don't think the problem
has to do with something left over from the previous call to fireAllRules().
This really should be a simple example and I am still at a loss
/wed.
Ron
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 18:37:26 +0100
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: rules-users@lists.jboss.org
Subject: Re: [rules-users] Drools 4 poor performance scaling?
Ron,
Can you send me your project in zip, i'd be interesting to see this.
Mark
10 matches
Mail list logo
