On Monday, January 09, 2012 at 01:34 PM, Kartik Thakore wrote:
An idea I have is to change the name to Perl Game Development and
incorporate more then just SDL chapters into the manual. Any suggestions
are welcome!
The audience for Perl Game Development is slightly different from the
On Friday, July 01, 2011 at 07:26 pm, Kartik Thakore wrote:
What is the closure-over-dlfunc-pointer trick? Can I see an example of
this someplace?
See load_func() and build_thunk() in:
http://cpansearch.perl.org/src/CHROMATIC/P5NCI-0.31/lib/P5NCI.pm
... and generate_function() in:
http
On Tuesday 01 September 2009 05:49:50 David Goehrig wrote:
Sdl-perl has been in cpan for 9 years and that hasn't helped much.
I believe that has more to do with the fact that it's nearly impossible to
install SDL_perl from the CPAN due to its packaging and dependencies more than
anything else
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 11:14:18PM +0300, Gabor Szabo wrote:
I know it isn't but I just blogged about it and looked at
http://sdl.perl.org/ which has a news item from 2005 at the top.
Who has the keys to that web-site ?
Can you please add a simple news item with some
basic info regarding
On Tuesday 03 October 2006 10:24, Robert Gresham wrote:
I built and installed SDL_perl from CPAN last night. The Build did not
produce any errors, however, test failed in most of the items. The version
on cpan produce the error (or very similar to) Can't locate a loadable
module for
On Wednesday 01 March 2006 16:51, Geoffrey Broadwell wrote:
I believe I'm responsible for one of the branches chromatic was
referring to -- it was actually just a revivification of Tels' 1.20.x
work.
Indeed. There was David's private tree, the tree hosted at sdl.perl.org, and
the OpenGL
paths), feel free to grab the latest
snapshot:
http://wgz.org/chromatic/perl/sdl/SDL-Perl.tar.gz
-- c
Index: build_lib/SDL/Build/Freebsd.pm
===
--- build_lib/SDL/Build/Freebsd.pm (revision 863)
+++ build_lib/SDL/Build
On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 12:31 +, Krystian Samp wrote:
Hi Krystian,
Hello again...
it seems that there is linking problem. look for 'ldd libSDL-1.1.so.7'
output:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]::lib ldd libSDL-1.1.so.7
libSDL-1.1.so.7:
libm.so.2 = /usr/lib/libm.so.2 (0x2815d000)
On Tue, 2005-01-04 at 21:54 +, Krystian Samp wrote:
Hi Krystian,
I've found also that during build process when compiling some sources
there is cc parameter:
-I/usr/X11R6/include/GL
should be:
-I/usr/X11R6/include
beceuse sources always include Gl/gl.h etc. I
On Tue, 2005-01-04 at 21:54 +, Krystian Samp wrote:
Hi Krystian,
I've found also that during build process when compiling some sources
there is cc parameter:
-I/usr/X11R6/include/GL
should be:
-I/usr/X11R6/include
beceuse sources always include Gl/gl.h etc. I
On Sat, 2004-11-27 at 13:42 +, javier bellido wrote:
Hi Javier,
All the libs are in /usr/lib
I'm guessing that there are older versions in /usr/local/lib that the
configuration process picked up.
cc -shared -L/usr/local/lib -o blib/arch/auto/SDL_perl/SDL_perl.so
src/SDL_perl.o
On Sun, 2004-04-18 at 18:52, Cory Johns wrote:
As chromatic noted, Build::SDL::Win32 was originally missing. With
the newest snapshot he uploaded, I found that
Build::SDL::Win32::subsystems() and Build::SDL::Win32::libraries()
were not returning the correct thing. Adding return $subsystems
better.
We should be able to skip that on Windows. At least, SDL::Build::Win32
skips that.
BTW, Chromatic, the link to the snapshot seems to give me a much older
version than is availiable from CPAN. CPAN=2.1.0, Snapshot=1.20.3.
I tried that one, but it also fails building.
I haven't updated
On Wed, 2004-04-07 at 16:47, Alex Lyman wrote:
I have, I believe, the latest version: 2.1.0, which I note that Chromatic
added some build support for in February.
1. Has this been fixed in a newer (unreleased?) version?
Maybe! Can you try the newer-in-a-different-way snapshot here
On Thu, 2004-03-25 at 22:15, Andy Bakun wrote:
I somewhat get the impression that the 2.1.x release is the development
release because sdl.perl.org mentions that 2.0.5 is the latest. Is this
the case? Is SDL_Perl development split into stable and development
versioning?
No, it's simply
On Tue, 2004-02-24 at 11:02, John Beppu wrote:
The has() method in this release has a bug.
Here's how it looks right now:
sub has
{
my ($class, $define) = @_;
scalar grep { exists $$sdl_config{$_}{$define} } keys %$sdl_config;
}
Unfortunately, even if
On Tue, 2004-02-24 at 17:14, David J. Goehrig wrote:
I was however under the impression that if you
didn't have a lib, there shouldn't be an entry
in SDL::Config!
They do have an entry, but their values are 0. I did this so as not to
throw away information (what features *could* we have
On Sat, 2004-02-07 at 13:37, david goehrig wrote:
2.0.5 is there, have not been able to post
the patches, keep being rejected because of
mydoom filters.
Would it help to zip them?
If someone with access to the sdl.perl.org
site could also stick up a link that would be great.
Done -- it'll
18 matches
Mail list logo
