On 26/10/2019 09:27, Garry Hurley wrote:
> -1
>
> While I agree it is good to support Java 11, forcing a move to Java 11 will
> hamstring some users of James. First of all, government agencies are slow
> to adopt new versions, mainly because they have few actual employees
> well-versed enough to
+1
Thanks for the proposal.
On 24/10/2019 21:43, Matthieu Baechler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose the migration to Java 11 as a runtime.
>
> I opened an ADR here: https://github.com/apache/james-project/pull/174
>
> Here is the content of this ADR:
>
>
+1
On 24/10/2019 21:43, Matthieu Baechler wrote:
Hi,
I would like to propose the migration to Java 11 as a runtime.
I opened an ADR here: https://github.com/apache/james-project/pull/174
Here is the content of this ADR:
---
#
-1
While I agree it is good to support Java 11, forcing a move to Java 11 will
hamstring some users of James. First of all, government agencies are slow
to adopt new versions, mainly because they have few actual employees
well-versed enough to know what enhancements the new versions of Java
+1

___
Ing. Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini
Liquidatore - GoCloud S.r.l
Sede legale: Via Larga 15, 20122 Milano (MI)
Cel. +39-3939837493
fax: +39-02-25514302
https://google.com/+VincenzoGianferrariPiniGoCloud
https://www.linkedin.com/in/vgianferrari
+1
Le jeu. 24 oct. 2019 à 16:43, Matthieu Baechler a
écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose the migration to Java 11 as a runtime.
>
> I opened an ADR here: https://github.com/apache/james-project/pull/174
>
> Here is the content of this ADR:
>
>
