Re: AW: Re: failed to compile from source - again

2017-06-08 Thread Raphael OUAZANA
Hi, The best way if you want to fix these flaky tests (ie non deterministic tests) is to try to reproduce them in your favorite IDE. Regards, Raphaël Ouazana. Le 2017-06-08 13:28, cryptearth a écrit : Hey Benoit, first: sorry for getting your name the wrong way around - I was confused by

AW: Re: failed to compile from source - again

2017-06-08 Thread cryptearth
Hey Benoit, first: sorry for getting your name the wrong way around - I was confused by your signature. About maildir not supported on Windows: didn't knew, but IOException got thrown and the stack for it made it pretty clear whats happening. Fun fact: try to compile a class called "aux" - it

Re: failed to compile from source - again

2017-06-08 Thread Benoit Tellier
Hi, My answers inlined... Cheers, Le 08/06/2017 à 16:16, cryptearth a écrit : > Hey Rapael, > > I know about this as Tellier told me this once the first time I reported > issues when first tried to build beta5. So this is what I as a hobbiest don't > understand: if the commit that is made

Re: failed to compile from source - again

2017-06-08 Thread cryptearth
Hey Rapael, I know about this as Tellier told me this once the first time I reported issues when first tried to build beta5. So this is what I as a hobbiest don't understand: if the commit that is made public at least passed all tests once - why it's failing so differently on my different

Re: failed to compile from source - again

2017-06-08 Thread Raphael OUAZANA
Hey Matt, Thank you for your interest in this project. You seem to have some issues building James. That's something that can happen because with have some flaky tests, and not enough time to solve them all. But you should now that each time we are making a commit, all the tests do pass at