Hi,
The best way if you want to fix these flaky tests (ie non deterministic
tests) is to try to reproduce them in your favorite IDE.
Regards,
Raphaël Ouazana.
Le 2017-06-08 13:28, cryptearth a écrit :
Hey Benoit,
first: sorry for getting your name the wrong way around - I was
confused by
Hey Benoit,
first: sorry for getting your name the wrong way around - I was confused by
your signature.
About maildir not supported on Windows: didn't knew, but IOException got thrown
and the stack for it made it pretty clear whats happening.
Fun fact: try to compile a class called "aux" - it
Hi,
My answers inlined...
Cheers,
Le 08/06/2017 à 16:16, cryptearth a écrit :
> Hey Rapael,
>
> I know about this as Tellier told me this once the first time I reported
> issues when first tried to build beta5. So this is what I as a hobbiest don't
> understand: if the commit that is made
Hey Rapael,
I know about this as Tellier told me this once the first time I reported issues
when first tried to build beta5. So this is what I as a hobbiest don't
understand: if the commit that is made public at least passed all tests once -
why it's failing so differently on my different
Hey Matt,
Thank you for your interest in this project.
You seem to have some issues building James. That's something that can
happen because with have some flaky tests, and not enough time to solve
them all.
But you should now that each time we are making a commit, all the tests
do pass at
Hey there,
sorry for me to taking so long to reply - but it happend again: as I was
preparing to set up some VMs for testing - I failed again the cursed
game of luck to download the working commit and got the RC2 you just
pushed out. As I didn't knew it the time I just lazyly started another
Hi,
There's several things worth saying :
1. I'm pretty sure you can build james by preventing the test suite to
execute (-DskipTests should do the trick)
2. A huge test suite is something every serious software should have but
it makes everything more complicated. What would you prefer :
Hi,
First thanks for the feedback, it is rather interesting.
> So, to start this of with a meme: One does not simply - compile Apache
James from source.
:-)
> Call me stupid
I would never. We all have different backgrounds, thus we don't consider
the same things easy.
About the 3 fails that
So, to start this of with a meme: One does not simply - compile Apache
James from source.
Idk if and what I'm doin wrong here, but either its my hardware screwing
up everything I've learned about Java (would explain random crashes in
GTA5 tho) or I'm just to stupid to correctly setup the needed
