Pete,
I am attempting to get caught on the latest beta and just have a few
questions. I noticed Sniffer is now called a different way in the
Declude config files, is that correct? On the last release (running
persistent), we have numerous entries in the declude.cfg file labeled:
SNIFFER-TRAVEL
Integration, and Log Parsers.
Keith Johnson wrote:
Darrell,
You are right, a reboot will take care of it for a season, then it comes back
out of the blue. Very strange indeed.
Keith
_
From: Message Sniffer Community on behalf of Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Sent: Sat 6/9/2007 9:36 PM
?scid=kb;EN-US;q142676 and changing
the registry entry to use a value of 256 or 2048 (NOTE: Microsoft
recommends 512 in that article; if you use 512, make sure not to have IMail's
MaxQueProc registry entry set to more than 30).
Matt
Keith Johnson wrote:
Darrell,
Did you alter your heap size
Pete,
If you don't mind, does WeightGate add any noticeable CPU cycles
to run on top of running Sniffer? Thanks for the aid.
Keith Johnson
-Original Message-
From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Pete McNeil
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 4:57
Pete,
Perfect. I will work on setting up this account for you. What email
address can I use to send over the POP info?
Keith
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Pete McNeil
Sent: Tue 9/6/2005 11:00 PM
To: Keith Johnson
Subject: Re: [sniffer
Pete,
In the past, we have been processing missed spam ourselves by asking
our end customers, those who can, forward us the header and we will adjust our
filters. However, I notice on the sortmonster.com website that one can forward
to an address missed spam and Sniffer can make
Scott,
HS = Test says ham, final result was spam. This is an inaccurate ham result.
'False negative'
How are you auto determining that an email that was ham was really spam? Are
you keying in this info into your stats based on your viewing of the email or
by user complaint? Obviously, if
is 1 hop away (on switch backbone). I had to drop back to the
non-persistent mode, thus the .stat file disappeared. I will run it
again tonight and copy the file away and post it here tonight.
Thanks again for the time and aid.
Keith Johnson
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
of results I get and post them
here. It could be as you say, I am on the far side :)
Thanks again,
Keith
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete McNeil
Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 2:16 PM
To: Keith Johnson
Subject: Re[4]: [sniffer
. Thanks again for taking
the time to help out.
Keith
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Pete McNeil
Sent: Fri 4/1/2005 10:18 PM
To: Keith Johnson
Cc:
Subject: Re[8]: [sniffer] Persistent Sniffer
I noticed in the archives about a .cfg file one can configure for use
when running Persistent sniffer. How do you download it or obtain it?
Thanks for the aid.
Keith
This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and
(un)subscription instructions go to
Is there a easy way to determine the Sniffer version you are running (i.e.
command line or the like)? Thanks for the aid.
Keith
winmail.dat
We run Sniffer in the normal way (non-persistent), is there an extra
file that we must copy into the Sniffer directory in order for this
version to work properly? I believe I read somewhere of a config file
that contains needed settings. Thanks again,
Keith
-Original Message-
From:
Pete,
We plan to, working on the SrvAny service in beta right now.
Thanks again for the aid and time.
Keith
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete McNeil
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 5:07 PM
To: Keith Johnson
Subject: Re[2
Thanks Andy and Bill, will give this a go on our beta server. Thanks
again for the time and expertise
Keith
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Schmidt
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 12:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE:
If we don't run the Mdaemon on our systems and just use the new
download, will we also see a speed increase on processing. Thanks for
the time.
Keith
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete McNeil
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 1:50 PM
Pete,
I take it this can be run without the persistent mode? Thanks for the aid.
Keith
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Pete McNeil
Sent: Mon 9/13/2004 9:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: [sniffer]
I found a .fin file in my sniffer directory and didn't know if anyone
knew what it was and how it is produced. It is dated several days ago.
Thanks for the aid.
Keith
This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and
(un)subscription instructions go to
I am using Declude and have indiv. Sniffer Tests and lets say the
following gets tripped in an email
SNIFFER-WHTLIST result code 000
SNIFFER-PORNresult code 054
Which would take precedence over the other, as far as which would be the
final code passed to Declude?
Thanks,
Keith
This
Thanks for the aid. One last question, you mentioned:
In a case where a white rule is present and a black rule is present the
white rule will always win
So if the White Rule fired 000, it would override a Porn Rule of 54? If so, how are
these White Rules entered?
Thanks,
Keith
20 matches
Mail list logo