On Wednesday, January 19, 2005, 8:00:41 PM, Chuck wrote:
CS It appears that emails from statefarm.com are all being failed by
CS SNIFFER-OBFUSCATION code 61. It appears from multiple senders and to
CS multiple recipient domains. Any thoughts??
Update.
I've just removed a rule that matches
I just wanted to add some stats that I thought might be of some use
here. I gathered info on my block rates over the past three days and
compared my Sniffer hits to them. There has been no measurable change
to my system with an average of 96% of spam getting tagged by Sniffer.
I'm at least not
On Monday, January 10, 2005, 3:05:18 PM, Phillip wrote:
PC How do you use both Sniffer and SURBL together? What else is required.
On most platforms SNF is integrated through, or in front of other
anti-spam / anti-virus software. For example, SNF is frequently placed
in front of SpamAssassin, or
On Saturday, January 8, 2005, 7:47:14 AM, Kirk wrote:
KM I'm still getting a ton of spam that, theoretically, I shouldn't be
KM seeing. Stuff such as Tadalafil Soft Tabs ads that are identical to
KM samples I've forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] multiple times in the last
KM week, yet are still
Is there any tool available with which to analyze sniffer logs to get any
kind of count on the number of hits, etc?
--
Kirk Mitchell-General Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Keystone Connect Unlock Your World
Altoona, PA 814-941-5000 http://www.keyconn.net
This E-Mail came
On Friday, January 7, 2005, 12:55:34 AM, Phillip wrote:
PC Is there anything special I need to do to get sniffer to work with VopMail?
PC I have everything in the way it is supposed to be but seems like it doesn't
PC do anything. No mail is being put into the spam directory. I am using the
PC
Pete,
It does run from the command line, creates the log file. I didn't give it a
file to check so it gave and error so at least it does something.
For some reason it won't run the sniffer program from the batch file.
I put in a pause and ran it, it is returning an error code of 65 with no
file
Title: Re: [sniffer] OT - exchange 5.5 help
Configure the IMS (internet mail service/connector in echange manager)
You have to disable the microsoft smtp server (iis5 smtp) exchange 55 has its own smtp
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED
If this person is using Declude, Mdaemon or SpamAssassin, they might
want to consider just using the blackholes.us zones that list every
known IP delegated to certain countries that are known to have spam
problems (in addition to some providers as well). This stuff can be set
up as a simple
Something is not right with my rulebase I think.
I went from 11mb to 23mb then down to 5mb.
Is that right?
H.
Pete McNeil wrote:
On Wednesday, January 5, 2005, 1:22:29 AM, Landry wrote:
LW Yep, just checked mine rulebase too, went from 17mb to just under 25mb.
LW Things still appear to be
On Wednesday, January 5, 2005, 10:55:35 AM, MCSE wrote:
SSMOE Just wanted to chime in here that the original changes seem to have
helped
SSMOE my rulebase as it has gone down from 11,355,504 bytes to 4,871,976 bytes
but
SSMOE I believe I'm still at the 'standard' rulebase strength.
This is
Pete,
I've been meaning to add a link to a script from within Killer WebMail
that will allow me to report things to you with a single click. If I do
this, am I correct in assuming that I should just use something like
CDONTS to construct a mail and place the original source as the body?
If
Thanks Pete, these are the kind of proactive notification I wish some of our
other vendors followed.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: Pete McNeil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 1:35 PM
To: sniffer@SortMonster.com
Subject: [sniffer] Weak rule removal work...
I've sure been seeing it. My db updates are triggered off email update
notices from sniffer, so I know I have the latest.
Feels like something's gone wrong with sniffer due to the year change.
Rick Robeson
getlocalnews.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
many of them for ... my cheating wife.
Sorry to hear about your marital problems.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Kirk Mitchell
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 05:56 PM
To: sniffer@SortMonster.com
Subject: [sniffer] new spam storm?
I've noted that dictionary attack type spam is generally of this
variety, and while you are probably blocking a great deal of this, the
sheer volume makes it look like you aren't doing that well against it.
I've also noted that the domains that they use are frequently changed,
thus escaping
At 06:03 PM 1/4/2005 -0500, Andy Schmidt wrote:
many of them for ... my cheating wife.
Sorry to hear about your marital problems.
LOL! Apparently the tramp's been sleeping all over, and there are plenty of
websites that can show me how, where, when, and with whom. Darned if I know
when she's
Correction, make that 23 meg!
Mike
- Original Message -
From: Computer House Support [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: sniffer@SortMonster.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 12:33 AM
Subject: [sniffer] RuleBase ktk82hrr
Dear Pete,
Our rulebase file grew from 11 meg to 17.5 meg since the
Title: Message
It
appears that all mail is failing spamheaders. You should quit using the
spam headers test until declude fixes the bug. Discussion of this is on
the declude lits.
Chuck SchickWarp 8,
Inc.(303)-421-5140www.warp8.com
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL
Jim,
See the Declude list, it is a Declude problem
In short, turn off SPAMHEADERS by commenting out the test. It has a
bug with 2005 years in the date header. They should be coming out with
a fix shortly.
Matt
Jim Matuska wrote:
Has anything changed recently in the
format of
Another update too, it looks like the sniffer
mailing list messages are failing spamheaders as well.
Jim Matuska Jr.Computer Tech2, CCNANez
Perce TribeInformation Systems[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From:
Jim Matuska
To: sniffer@SortMonster.com
Sent:
On Monday, January 3, 2005, 11:02:17 AM, Jim wrote:
JM Has anything changed recently in the format of the sniffer
JM notification messages? I am noticing all the notifications for
JM the last few days have been failing decludes spamheaders test,
JM this hasn't happened before.
The update
There is an issue with one
of our spam tests in Declude JunkMail (the SPAMHEADERS test) where it will
cause the test to be triggered on most E-mails sent after the year 2004.
Fortunately, the SPAMHEADERS test is a minor test, which has a default weight
of just 15% of what we recommend
Bennie, I will send you my updated scripts and a couple of necessary
open-source utilities off-list (hopefully you can receive zipped executable
files - let me know if you don't receive my off-list message).
Also, as Pete mentioned, we have had some discussion on the list the past
couple of days
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Tolmachoff (Lists)
Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 12:23 AM
To: sniffer@SortMonster.com
Subject: RE: [sniffer] Triggered
rulebase update instructions
Were might the wget and gzip files be?
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices
Since Pete replied to Bill's response and he also modified his stance on
one item, I figured I would just piece my thoughts below.
Pete McNeil wrote:
On Wednesday, December 29, 2004, 2:31:18 AM, Landry wrote:
snip/
MB 2) I personally find it to be a bit messy to have everything
MB running
To: sniffer@SortMonster.com
Subject: RE: [sniffer] Triggered
rulebase update instructions
Now I just wait for the next update to
occur.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
]
On Behalf Of Landry William
Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 9:08 PM
To: 'sniffer@SortMonster.com'
Subject: RE: [sniffer] Triggered rulebase update instructions
Attached is an updated instructions file to fix some typos and missed
information. I'll send out another update after receiving feedback from
-Original Message-
From: Woody G Fussell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 7:57 AM
To: sniffer@SortMonster.com
Subject: RE: [sniffer] Triggered rulebase update instructions
Bill
This would apply to Imail users.
I suggest that rather than creating two aliases
'
Subject: RE: [sniffer] Triggered rulebase update instructions
There are many ways to skin this cat. For Declude JunkMail Pro users, you
could also setup a COPYTO action to notify the program alias. However, the
dual alias setup appeared to be the simplest way for the novice mail admin
to get
, 2004 2:37 PM
To: 'sniffer@SortMonster.com'
Subject: RE: [sniffer] Triggered rulebase update instructions
There are many ways to skin this cat. For Declude JunkMail Pro users, you
could also setup a COPYTO action to notify the program alias. However, the
dual alias setup appeared
Information Systems
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: sniffer@SortMonster.com
Sent: Monday, December 27, 2004 10:03 PM
Subject: Re: [sniffer] Downloads are slow...
I agree entirely. If bandwidth has become an issue, it would be resolved
with a focus
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Jim Matuska
Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 12:49 PM
To: sniffer@SortMonster.com
Subject: Re: [sniffer] Downloads are slow...
I agree that something needs to be done about the update scripts that are
inadvertently
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Woody G Fussell
Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 12:25 PM
To: sniffer@SortMonster.com
Subject: RE: [sniffer] Downloads are slow...
Why do you not use a program alias and only download when
Brian Gregory wrote:
Does anyone have some simple instructions on how to setup to use a program
alias?
I'm using Bill Landry's script, have not had the time to look in to using a
program alias to download upon receipt of notifications.
I just setup a program alias about 2 weeks ago using this as
Quick question if when you have a sucessful download if abcdef.new is
renamed than what is wget comparing on the next run of the script?
Darrell
Jim Matuska writes:
So far it seems to be working, at least it doesn't seem to be downloading
the rulebase yet, I'll have to see if it does later
/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 02:39 PM
To: sniffer@SortMonster.com
Subject: Re: [sniffer] Downloads are slow...
Quick question if when you have a sucessful download if abcdef.new
]
- Original Message -
From: Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: sniffer@SortMonster.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 11:38 AM
Subject: Re: [sniffer] Downloads are slow...
Quick question if when you have a sucessful download if abcdef.new is
renamed than what is wget
of the additional steps? I just pointed my program
alias directly to my snfupd.cmd file and it works just fine.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: Russ Uhte [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 12:33 PM
To: Daniel Ivey
Cc: sniffer@SortMonster.com
Subject: Re: [sniffer
rem this script is used to update sniffer rulbase
rem most of this was ibased on / inspired by what other users posted on this
list, I thanks everybody for their inputs
rem it calls wget, fgrep, imail1, gzip, snf2check
rem it checks for new files, and can be used by both alias trigger or
Attached is an updated instructions file to fix some typos and missed
information. I'll send out another update after receiving feedback from
others.
Bill
---
This message and any included attachments are from
Of Matt
Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 10:17 PM
To: sniffer@SortMonster.com
Subject: Re: [sniffer] Triggered
rulebase update instructions
Bill,
I think that this is overwhelmingly much better (the whole thing), but I have a
few suggestions to add.
1) The commenting in the
CMD file seemed a bit
Title: Message
Thanks
for all of the suggestions, Matt. See my comments
below:
-Original Message-From: Matt
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 10:17
PMTo: sniffer@SortMonster.comSubject: Re: [sniffer]
Triggered rulebase update instructionsBill,I
:
sniffer@SortMonster.comSubject: RE: [sniffer] Triggered rulebase
update instructions
Matt, you think too
much.
;)
(From one who needs
to implement better scripts, including a triggered script for
Sniffer.)
John
Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices
On Monday, December 27, 2004, 1:17:21 AM, Chuck wrote:
CS Pete:
CS It appears on weekends the sniffer downloads are really slow. I am
CS downloading at 14 minutes past the hour and I am about 1/20 th of the normal
CS speed.
That is an unusual observation - I don't think weekends have anything
On Monday, December 27, 2004, 10:24:00 AM, Jim wrote:
JM Is anyone else seeing a huge flood of spam over the
JM weekend? I have received a ton of it since Friday, a lot of it is
JM not being picked up by sniffer either.
I believe I can explain this phenomena.
Over weekends and holidays
Jim:
We saw just the opposite. The amount of Spam appeared to be down over the
holiday weekend. We saw less total volume and less spam in the spam traps.
Chuck Schick
Warp 8, Inc.
(303)-421-5140
www.warp8.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
Kevin Stanford wrote:
Our updates seem to be taking a very long time. I am 85% updated and the
ETA shows 07:00. Is it me?
I see stuff like this come and go... Our updates are (finally)
triggered from the email notifications... Below is a snippet of the
last update that shows exactly what
PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Russ Uhte [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: sniffer@SortMonster.com
Sent: Monday, December 27, 2004 8:45 AM
Subject: Re: [sniffer] Sniffer Updates
Kevin Stanford wrote:
Our updates seem to be taking a very long time. I am 85% updated and the
ETA shows 07:00. Is it me
Jim Matuska Jr.Computer Tech2, CCNANez
Perce TribeInformation Systems[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "Jim Matuska" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: sniffer@SortMonster.com
Sent: Monday, December 27, 2004 9:22
AM
Subject: Re: [sniffer] Sniffer
Updates
I too am seeing r
Curl is an awesome application that we also use for automating downloads.
Wget also supports conditional downloads based on time/date stamp when
using the -N switch. In ether case, please also use the compression support
built into each application, the sniffer rulebase files can be compressed
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Pete McNeil
Sent: Monday, December 27, 2004 08:10 AM
To: Chuck Schick
Subject: Re: [sniffer] Downloads are slow...
On Monday, December 27, 2004, 1:17:21 AM, Chuck wrote:
CS Pete:
CS It appears on weekends the sniffer downloads
)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
http://www.HM-Software.com/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Pete McNeil
Sent: Monday, December 27, 2004 08:10 AM
To: Chuck Schick
Subject: Re: [sniffer] Downloads are slow...
On Monday, December 27, 2004, 1:17:21 AM
OK, being a new (and very happy) customer ...
For example, we will be introducing rules that watch for bounces
that contain large numbers of failed addresses - indicating a
probable dictionary attack / joe-job ...
What is a joe-job? Spam from Billy Bob?
Send coffee...
Chris
This E-Mail
Title: Message
-Original Message-From:
Chris Ulrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
OK, being a new (and very happy) customer ...
For example, we will be introducing rules that watch for
bounces that contain large numbers of failed addresses -
indicating a probable dictionary attack /
Title: Message
I currently use mxGuard. It works great
for me with F-Prot, ClamAV, and Message Sniffer. Declude has more configuration
options, but for the price mxGuard is hard to beat. Plus the cost is low enough
that you can afford to purchase more than one copy if you have multiple
snip/
JW Does anyone have a complete list of mail servers that have
JW direct support for Sniffer? The Imail / Declude thing is too much
JW to deal with and I'm going to make a change.
http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Installation/HowTo.html
There are others also, not officially
Title: Message
Joe,
In their defense, I don't think that they necessarily knew any better
than to have approached it this way. I don't necessarily get that the
new ownership has worked from the IT side of the business before and
understands security and trust as a corporate administrator
Title: Message
There's a Sniffer plugin for MDaemon v8.0 (MD 8.0 is still
in beta)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe
WolfSent: woensdag 22 december 2004 15:42To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [sniffer] Sniffer
updates...
I'm currently using Sniffer via Imail
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2004 7:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [sniffer] Sniffer
updates...
Joe,
In their defense, I don't think that they necessarily knew any better than to
have approached it this way. I don't necessarily get that the new
Title: Message
After much debate we decided to abandon
Declude/Imail and switch to Mdaemon and will migrate sniffer to the new
platform.
Jim Matuska Jr.Computer Tech2, CCNANez
Perce TribeInformation Systems[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From:
Joe Wolf
To: [EMAIL
Title: Message
I may have missed this if it was discussed.
But my last conversation with IPSwitch is that as a current user of IMail I can
continue to purchase support and keep getting updates to the IMail portions
without going to the new product. The person told me that the
Collaboration
Title: Message
Scott Fosseen wrote:
I may have missed this if it was
discussed. But my last conversation with IPSwitch is that as a current
user of IMail I can continue to purchase support and keep getting
updates to the IMail portions without going to the new product. The
ve had no complaints with it at
all. Seems to do exactly what I was told it would do.
Thanks to everyone for their input!
-Joe
- Original Message -
From:
John Tolmachoff (Lists)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2004 9:58
AM
Subject: RE: [sniffer
On Tuesday, December 21, 2004, 6:20:40 AM, System wrote:
SA Pete,
SA Our subscribers can forward spam they receive to our [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SA address, which gets forwarded to you guys. Some spammers have been sending
SA e-mail messages directly to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] address (cutting out the
on 12/21/04 8:21 AM, Pete McNeil wrote:
The second possibility is that we've skipped the message for some
safety reason (trying to avoid false positives) though it seems
unlikely in this case.
Once I see it I will be able to tell more.
Would adding direct to spam in the subject make these
It sounds good to me, Pete.
May I humbly suggest that this be a new result code, e.g. 046? Until
now, Message Sniffer has been very parsimonious with the new categories,
but this looks like one that will be here for a long time.
Andrew 8)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Given that the precision is difficult to assign under the single result
framework, I don't doubt the choice. Might I suggest creating a
sub-group for the three main types of backscatter so that individuals
can turn them off as a group instead of one rule at a time. Note that
the three groups
FYI,
I'm still debating myself about what to do with this stuff. I'm hoping
that it will go away, albeit slowly, and I presently rarely take action
to correct any issues with this E-mail, though I do reprocess some
individual messages. Seems that many of the C/R providers have gotten
better
Pete McNeil wrote:
On Monday, December 20, 2004, 7:58:57 AM, Alexander wrote:
HA Hello,
HA I'm trying at the moment, Wget says 50-90 K/s (started at 40, went quick up
HA to 90 and now going down to 50K/s)
There are times - especially at the top of the hour - where there are
quite a few downloads
Greg,
Yes, I should have inserted a "probably" or otherwise taken more care
with my words. I didn't mean for my reply to be contentious.
Anyway, here's a sample of what I am talking about. I've isolated most
major bulk-mail providers from the rest of my Hold E-mail which
constitutes about 2%
.
- Original Message -
From:
Matt
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004 6:35
AM
Subject: Re: [sniffer] My issues with the
General category, looking forabettersolution
Greg,Yes, I should have inserted a "probably" or
otherwise taken more care with m
Me too
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Chuck Schick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 7:44 PM
Subject: [sniffer] Download server is really slow..
Anyone else having that problem?
Chuck Schick
Warp 8, Inc.
(303)-421-5140
On Monday, December 13, 2004, 3:40:41 PM, ~ wrote:
~RZ~ Hey everyone...
~RZ~ How does this whole trial thing work? What is limited about it? How does
~RZ~ the spam rule file update? How long will it work? How do i change from the
~RZ~ old spam file to the new one?
Many questions One at a
On Friday, December 10, 2004, 12:14:22 PM, Rick wrote:
RR If I make a change to any of the whitelist,blacklist, or trusted files, and
RR I'm using sniffer in a 'persistent' mode, do I have to restart anything to
RR pick up the changes?
I'm not sure I completely understand.
If there are changes
PROTECTED] Behalf Of Pete McNeil
Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 10:06 AM
To: Rick Robeson
Subject: Re: [sniffer] Required reload question?
On Friday, December 10, 2004, 12:14:22 PM, Rick wrote:
RR If I make a change to any of the whitelist,blacklist, or trusted
RR files,
and
RR I'm using sniffer
.
Rick Robeson
getlocalnews.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Pete McNeil
Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 10:06 AM
To: Rick Robeson
Subject: Re: [sniffer] Required reload question?
On Friday
Title: Message
Well,
an indirect way to do this is to use the (undocumented?) Declude
directive:
rsp
set off TESTNAME
as the
first bit of text in your test message. That won't actually trigger
sniffer, but it will for the purpose of making your JunkMail think that the test
has been
Katie,
Take a copy of the failed message and submit it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with your lcinese base ID and they will tell you why it failed and setup a
whiterule to prevent it from being tagged in the future.
Darrell
Rob,
If you followed the walkthrough on the site, you should
have result code headersin your e-mail messages. Could you check if that's
the case?
Regards,
Michiel
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ~ ROB @ ZELLEM
~Sent: woensdag 8 december 2004 20:54To:
On Monday, December 6, 2004, 3:18:01 PM, Mark wrote:
MES Pete,
MES Just downloaded the most recent version and the command line build
MES information says:
MES Build - v2-3.1 Oct 26 2004 22:03:06
MES I downloaded it twice from the help page.
What is the URL to the help page? I want to correct
Where can i find examples of using exit codes to assign different weights
depending on groupes, when using sniffer with declude/imail ?
TIA
- Original Message -
From: Pete McNeil [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jim Matuska [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 9:59 PM
Subject:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2004 2:09 AM
Subject: Re: [sniffer] It's worth it
On Tuesday, November 30, 2004, 1:14:00 AM, Andrew wrote:
CA So, I've been using the free trial edition of Sniffer for
CA the better part of 2 years (wow, time flies!) and just purchased
CA two licences
On Tuesday, November 30, 2004, 12:11:12 PM, David wrote:
DLW Has anyone else seen a massive increase in SPAM not being caught by Messgae
DLW Sniffer recently? On a personal level I'm now seeing around 20-30
undetected
DLW junk emails per day whereas a couple of weeks ago it was of the order 2-5
Yes,
I have seen three pieces of spam over and over again - two for drugs and one
porn. I am running the latest version, rules are up to date, no on the log
files, I am forwarding the emails to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I was thinking about raising this issue so I am glad someone else is seeing
the
]
Subject: Re: [sniffer] Not Getting Updates
Pete,
I forward all my messages from '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' to trigger my
update. If
my renewal notice is sent from the same address I will not receive it.
Can you send
me a update notification email or let me know what else to create the rule
on.
I
How do you get the email to trigger an update?
Josh Piche
Systems Administrator
CAUT
Scott Fosseen wrote:
Pete,
I forward all my messages from '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' to trigger my update. If my renewal notice is sent from the same address I will not receive it. Can you send me a update notification
On Monday, November 29, 2004, 3:43:03 PM, Steinar wrote:
SR Hi!
SR I want to try a new rule strength with Sniffer.
SR Can I change this myself or is this done by SortMonster?
I've responded to this off list.
However, for the benefit of everyone...
We will be offering expanded rulebases as
On Sunday, November 28, 2004, 6:01:39 PM, Richard wrote:
RF I just noticed that I am no longer getting updated emails for the sniffer to
RF trigger the automatic update.. The last one was on Nov 11...Customers had
RF told me they were getting more spam but I just thought we were getting
RF
Pete,
I forward all my messages from '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' to trigger my update. If my
renewal notice is sent from the same address I will not receive it. Can you
send me a update notification email or let me know what else to create the rule
on.
I could turn off the rule for a little while
Heimir Eidskrem wrote:
We did move Imail to a new server tonight and now im seeing some
errors in the sniffer logs.
What would cause this?
I am using Firedeamon to run sniffer in persitent mode. I must have
missed something in the transfer but not sure what.
20041129052719persitent453
On Monday, November 29, 2004, 12:31:57 AM, Heimir wrote:
HE We did move Imail to a new server tonight and now im seeing some errors
HE in the sniffer logs.
HE What would cause this?
If you look carefully you will see that persistent is mis-spelled. It
is missing an 's'. As a result it is being
, November 24, 2004 12:10 PM
Subject: Re: [sniffer] New Version 2-3.2 has been officiallyreleased.
System Administrator wrote:
on 11/24/04 12:19 PM, Colbeck, Andrew wrote:
p.s. More favourite acronyms:
RGE (Resume Generating Event)
TLA (Three Letter Acronym)
PEBKAC (problem exist between keyboard
We run Sniffer in the normal way (non-persistent), is there an extra
file that we must copy into the Sniffer directory in order for this
version to work properly? I believe I read somewhere of a config file
that contains needed settings. Thanks again,
Keith
-Original Message-
From:
Running without known problems.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
HM Systems Software, Inc.
600 East Crescent Avenue, Suite 203
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458-1846
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
http://www.HM-Software.com/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Running smoothly here...
Chuck Breitkreutz
Phone: (940) 549-0339
Fax: (940) 549-0393
Digital Passage
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Pete McNeil
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 2:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [sniffer] How are
Lowish volume box, no problems seen.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Pete McNeil
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 2:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [sniffer] How are folks doing with the latest version?
Hello Sniffer Folks,
I am
We updated an imail server and it is fine, did not do the postfix mail
server update yet.
Herb
Pete McNeil wrote:
Hello Sniffer Folks,
I am curious to know how many folks have been using Version
2-3.1i2. I have not heard any problem reports, so I'm assuming it's
going well with you as it
So far so good...
Bill
-Original Message-
From: Pete McNeil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 12:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [sniffer] How are folks doing with the latest version?
Hello Sniffer Folks,
I am curious to know how many folks have been
11, 2004 3:38
AM
Subject: Re: [sniffer] MDaemon Opinion
OT
One thing to consider before making the Imail
- MDaemon jump (or similar mailservers)... When I evaluated
MDaemon, I noticed that messages are stored in individual .msg files inside
the user's mailbox directory. Imail
501 - 600 of 1018 matches
Mail list logo
