For the first (known) time I see Message Sniffer filter a valid mail.
The mail is from my Dell salesperson containing a quote.
This is from the IMail log:
20070926 091209 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (064801a658d9)
[143.166.85.206] EHLO ausc60pc101.us.dell.com
20070926 091210 127.0.0.1 SMTPD
-
From: Pete McNeil [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Darin Cox sniffer@SortMonster.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 11:21 AM
Subject: Re: [sniffer] False positive processing
On Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 9:38:46 AM, Darin wrote:
DC
DC
DC Hi Pete,
DC
DC
DC
DC Are you getting behind on false positive processing
On Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 11:37:30 AM, Darin wrote:
DC Nope. None of them.
DC I haven't heard back from the replies to a couple of false positives on the
DC 10th, and we haven't heard anything from our submissions on the 16th (6) and
DC 17th (2). I don't remember if we've heard anything from
to investigate further and apply white
DC rules. The others were normal FP reports.
DC Thanks,
DC Darin.
DC - Original Message -
DC From: Pete McNeil [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DC To: Darin Cox sniffer@SortMonster.com
DC Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 11:52 AM
DC Subject: Re[2]: [sniffer] False
Pete,
Thanks for the quicker turnaround in the last few
days for false positive processing. We're seeing abouthalf day
now.
Much appreciated!
Darin.
Hi,
I filed this false positive report a day ago and never heard back.
Just trying to see if my emails are blocked again.
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: Andy Schmidt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006
On average it takes 2 or three days to hear back on false positives.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Andy Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: sniffer@SortMonster.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 9:40 AM
Subject: [sniffer] False Positive - no reaction?
Hi,
I filed this false positive
I'm a little behind. I'm going to do false positives in the next 10
minutes. I only have 20 to do it should go fast. Sorry for the delay.
Thanks,
_M
On Tuesday, February 21, 2006, 9:40:07 AM, Andy wrote:
AS Hi,
AS I filed this false positive report a day ago and never heard back.
AS Just
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Pete McNeil
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 09:55 AM
To: Andy Schmidt
Subject: Re: [sniffer] False Positive - no reaction?
I'm a little behind. I'm going to do false positives in the next 10 minutes.
I only have 20 to do
On Tuesday, February 21, 2006, 10:16:11 AM, Andy wrote:
AS Sorry - didn't mean to be pushy. I just thought that false positives are
AS worse than missed spam, so I had assumed that they would always be at the
AS top of the queue.
It is a very tough balancing act. Don't feel bad at all - you're
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Pete McNeil
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 11:04 AM
To: Andy Schmidt
Subject: Re[2]: [sniffer] False Positive - no reaction?
On Tuesday, February 21, 2006, 10:16:11 AM, Andy wrote:
AS Sorry - didn't mean to be pushy. I just thought that false
I like this idea more than the email notification. I really don't need more
emails.
- Original Message -
From: Andy Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: sniffer@SortMonster.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 10:16 AM
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [sniffer] False Positive - no reaction?
Hi Pete
.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Andy Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: sniffer@SortMonster.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 11:16 AM
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [sniffer] False Positive - no reaction?
Hi Pete,
I agree that the email notification is tricky - because you might respond
On Tuesday, February 21, 2006, 11:16:43 AM, Andy wrote:
snip/
AS The only other suggestion I have is to create a 24 hour 'queue' display on
AS the web site. All you need to show is a column of the sender domain names of
AS the email (not the entire sender email address). If I submit a false
AS
Hello,
Could you please tell me what would cause an email to fail rule # 831417
This was a good email flagged this morning and deleted.
Regards,
Steve Guluk
SGDesign
(949) 661-9333
ICQ: 7230769
This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and
(un)subscription
Answered off-list
_M
On Tuesday, February 14, 2006, 2:07:48 PM, Steve wrote:
SG Hello,
SG Could you please tell me what would cause an email to fail rule # 831417
SG This was a good email flagged this morning and deleted.
SG Regards,
SG Steve Guluk
SG SGDesign
SG (949) 661-9333
SG ICQ:
Hello,
Could you please tell me what would cause an email to fail rule # 831417
This was a good email flagged this morning and deleted.
Regards,
Steve Guluk
SGDesign
(949) 661-9333
ICQ: 7230769
This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and
(un)subscription
, September 13, 2005 4:45 AM
To: John Tolmachoff (Lists)
Subject: Re[2]: [sniffer] False positive
I have your response in my sent folder.
I will send it again..
_M
On Monday, September 12, 2005, 8:37:52 PM, John wrote:
JTL I also have sent some false positives in the last 2 weeks
For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
JTL On
Behalf Of Pete McNeil
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2005 4:45 AM
To: John Tolmachoff (Lists)
Subject: Re[2]: [sniffer] False positive
I have your response in my sent folder.
I will send it again
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
JTL On
Behalf Of Pete McNeil
Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 5:08 AM
To: Ali Resting
Subject: Re: [sniffer] False positive
On Friday, September 9, 2005, 2:17:31 AM, Ali wrote:
AR Hi Peter,
AR I have submited 3
To: Ali Resting
Subject: Re: [sniffer] False positive
On Friday, September 9, 2005, 2:17:31 AM, Ali wrote:
AR Hi Peter,
AR I have submited 3 email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with all the required
AR fields as per you instaructions on the website, I have not received
any
AR feedback whether
Hi Peter,
I have submited 3 email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with all the required
fields as per you instaructions on the website, I have not received any
feedback whether this request has been effected.
Regards
Ali
---
This message was scanned for viruses by the Real Image Anti-virus filters
This
Here is another copy of my initial reply.
_M
On Friday, September 9, 2005, 2:17:31 AM, Ali wrote:
AR Hi Peter,
AR I have submited 3 email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with all the required
AR fields as per you instaructions on the website, I have not received any
AR feedback whether this request has
On Friday, September 9, 2005, 2:17:31 AM, Ali wrote:
Apologies to the list... I intended to send those responses directly.
_M
This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and
(un)subscription instructions go to
I'm pretty sure the rule that caused your trouble has been removed.
_M
On Thursday, August 4, 2005, 7:24:09 PM, Robert wrote:
RM After two attempts to email support and two attempts to
RM register a real false positive to [EMAIL PROTECTED], I would be
RM really grateful for some
After two attempts to email support and
two attempts to register a real false positive to [EMAIL PROTECTED], I would be
really grateful for some help. I suspect our email attempts may have failed to
reach sortmonster.
All email to and from one of our domains
since about the 21st July is
We do respond to all false reports that are made to us if we can
properly identify the sender - and often even if that is not the case.
I will research this further and contact you off list.
Thanks,
_M
On Thursday, August 4, 2005, 7:24:09 PM, Robert wrote:
RM After two attempts to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is there any reason this would be in the sniffer file...I tried to do some
troubleshooting and finally just whitelisted their address...and they got
itbut I don't think Declude was holding it...I have SNIFFER on Delete...
Richard Farris
Ethixs Online
1.270.247.
pure-speculation
There is a lot of symantec spam out there (that looks like it's not
from them of course)... It's possible that something used in one of
those made it into their auto confirm, or that a robot picked
something up in a cross reference on a trap.
/pure-speculation
The only way to
29 matches
Mail list logo
