RE: [sniffer] problems!!!!

2006-02-08 Thread Markus Gufler
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harry VanderzandSent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 4:02 PMTo: sniffer@SortMonster.comSubject: [sniffer] problems With the recent issues at sniffer it has caused tremendous problems with the entire client base here. Sniffer has been so

RE: [sniffer] problems!!!!

2006-02-08 Thread Harry Vanderzand
: sniffer@SortMonster.comSubject: RE: [sniffer] problems Harry, (please don't post your entire license code to a public list.) regarding the reliability of sniffer we should know that errors sometimes can happen, even at sniffer-side after they've worked for years now very

Re: [sniffer] problems!!!!

2006-02-08 Thread Darin Cox
positives that require review and are delayed in reaching the customer. Thoughts? Darin. - Original Message - From: Harry Vanderzand To: sniffer@SortMonster.com Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 10:02 AM Subject: [sniffer] problems With the recent issues at sniffer it has

RE: [sniffer] problems!!!!

2006-02-08 Thread Markus Gufler
so and so it shouldn't be necessary to do something like manualy block updates. Markus From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin CoxSent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 4:59 PMTo: sniffer@SortMonster.comSubject: Re: [sniffer] problems I ha

Re[2]: [sniffer] problems!!!!

2006-02-08 Thread Pete McNeil
On Wednesday, February 8, 2006, 10:59:09 AM, Darin wrote: DC I have an idea.  These problems seem to stem mostly from changes DC in the methods of handling rulebase updates. snip/ DC Would it be feasible to announce in advance when such changes DC are to be implemented?  With advance notice

Re: Re[2]: [sniffer] problems!!!!

2006-02-08 Thread Darin Cox
that, and unfreeze once it was clear that no glut of false positives would result. Darin. - Original Message - From: Pete McNeil [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Darin Cox sniffer@SortMonster.com Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 11:13 AM Subject: Re[2]: [sniffer] problems On Wednesday, February 8

Re: Re[2]: [sniffer] problems!!!!

2006-02-08 Thread Filippo Palmili
What is the correct Sniffer string in Declude Global.cfg file. SNIFFER external nonzero d:\imail\declude\sniffer\sniffer.exe code12 0 of SNIFFER external nonzero d:\imail\declude\sniffer\sniffer.exe code10 0 Thanks Filippo

Re[2]: [sniffer] problems!!!!

2006-02-08 Thread Pete McNeil
On Wednesday, February 8, 2006, 11:06:07 AM, Markus wrote: MG If a experimental rule showed to be reliable they move them in MG the appropriate category (rich, fraud,...) MG MG   MG MG I'm not sure about this but I think it's so and so it shouldn't MG be necessary to do something like

Re: [sniffer] problems!!!!

2006-02-08 Thread Pete McNeil
On Wednesday, February 8, 2006, 11:19:52 AM, Andy wrote: AS Pete, AS The only idea I came up with, would be to have ALL new rules go into a 6 AS hour proving category (=return code) before they are moved into their AS final category. AS By using Sniffer return codes, folks could decide to trust

Re[4]: [sniffer] problems!!!!

2006-02-08 Thread Pete McNeil
On Wednesday, February 8, 2006, 11:26:46 AM, Darin wrote: DC There was no error in my comment. I completely understand that some issues DC will not be foreseeable... I did say mostly, not entirely. The switch to DC the automated bots caused a rash of false positives in our system. snip/

Re: Re[4]: [sniffer] problems!!!!

2006-02-08 Thread Darin Cox
. Darin. - Original Message - From: Pete McNeil [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Darin Cox sniffer@SortMonster.com Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 11:46 AM Subject: Re[4]: [sniffer] problems On Wednesday, February 8, 2006, 11:26:46 AM, Darin wrote: DC There was no error in my comment. I

Re[6]: [sniffer] problems!!!!

2006-02-08 Thread Pete McNeil
On Wednesday, February 8, 2006, 12:34:44 PM, Darin wrote: DC Perhaps I used the wrong terminology about what changed, since I do not know DC what your system architecture is, but I remember you mentioning a DC significant change at the time. Immediately afterwards we saw a rash of DC false

Re: [sniffer] problems!!!!

2006-02-08 Thread David Sullivan
Wednesday, February 8, 2006, 11:19:52 AM, you wrote: AS The only idea I came up with, would be to have ALL new rules go into a 6 AS hour proving category (=return code) before they are moved into their AS final category. AS By using Sniffer return codes, folks could decide to trust the

[sniffer] Problems downloading Windows tools / starter scripts

2004-09-17 Thread Steve Flook
I am having problems downloading the starter scripts to automate updates for the rule base file detailed at http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/AutomatingUpdatesHelp.htm l. There are two sources to get the zip, both of which I am having issues:

Re: [sniffer] Problems downloading Windows tools / starter scripts

2004-09-17 Thread Pete McNeil
On Friday, September 17, 2004, 12:42:26 PM, Steve wrote: SF I am having problems downloading the starter scripts to automate updates Responded off list. _M This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to