I fly indoors with a couple of really hot heli guys. Guess what, the best of
them and I think he is really good tells me there maybe a tad difference but
he is not really sure, at any rate it will not matter for a newbe heli guy
like me. BTW, really good to me is rolling circles one foot off of
On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 05:32:34PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|Okay I was waiting for this one. With a standard FM system, not even a
|PCM System (which by the way is about the same as a 2.4 system...the
|word 'digital' is sort of a hint there)...with a standard FM system the
|
I understand that some of you will have skepticism in regard to the increase
in performance from the 2.4 Spread Spektrum Systems. The first time that I
flew a my 9303X 2.4 system in a glider I got the feeling I was better
connected to the glider. I did some high speed dives and pulled the
tell a difference and when everyone else has
left I will be all alone with my stock 9303.)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Fri, 7 Mar 2008 15:46:32 -0500Subject: Re: [RCSE]
What's the big deal about 2.4? - Lag...okay now we are getting ...To:
Soaring@airage.com
I understand that some of you will have
else
has left I will be all alone with my stock 9303.)
--
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2008 15:46:32 -0500
Subject: Re: [RCSE] What's the big deal about 2.4? - Lag...okay now we
are getting ...
To: Soaring@airage.com
I understand that some
You guys can feel the difference from faster servos, servos with higher
resolution, see or sense the slightest bubble in lift, detect the slightest
change in the air, feel the air temp changes yet the fact that spektrum is
measurably faster is somehow lost on human senses?
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at
A far cheaper way to increase 'response' would have been to get digital
servos.
and a 5-cell RX battery pack.
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send subscribe and
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please note that subscribe and
unsubscribe messages must be
Or 2 A123 in series ;) hehehe
-Original Message-
From: Jon Stone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2008 2:46 PM
To: soaring@airage.com
Subject: Re: [RCSE] What's the big deal about 2.4? - Lag...okay now we are
getting silly
A far cheaper way to increase 'response
The lag argument is well...goofy.
I have heard the Heli guys say they notice a difference, which actually makes
some sense. The Heli is far more susceptible to lag than perhaps any other
radio controlled device. I have also heard the IMAC guys say they notice a
difference. Maybe they do...but
I will add this and leave it alone. My flying went from constant correcting
of over correcting to having the plane respond the way I wanted it. And
nothing, not practice, faster servos, expo, dual rates, speed, etc...
improved the 'smoothness' of my flying like the spektrum.
If you guys don't
Yes!!! The first time I put it in my Marauder Woody, I got 5 hours out of
the 8 I was looking for! Not sure what I would have gotten with 72mhz...and a
little more slope wind.
Gordy :-)
In a message dated 3/7/2008 12:47:07 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
One of
11 matches
Mail list logo
