On 5 Mar 2003 at 17:07, Victor Bridger wrote:
Social Credit
stands for the freedom of the individual and decentralized policy within the bounds
of those
Christian ethical and metaphysical values.
Please don't fall into the same trap.
There are no basic values differences between any of
I have appreciated the comments on this general subject over the past few
days, and especially the additional information provided by Wally, Victor
and Curtiss. All of those are elements in my interpretation of the issue,
which I hope to get across in fewer than two pages.
Although by no means
I am sorry, but you just do not seem to have got the message.
Vic Bridger (note - name signed)
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Social Credit [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 6:22 PM
Subject: RE: [SOCIAL CREDIT] {SOCIAL CREDIT] Policy of a Philosophy
Part 1.
From a perusal of postings
on this subject over the last couple of weeks it is obvious that little has been
done to learn exactly what C. H.Douglas wrote and spoke about on it.
Difficulties arise between
people in different nations who do not speak the same language. Difficulties
Part two.
Practical Christianity:
Social Credit has nothing
to do with any theological organization or religious faith. The introduction
of Roman Catholicism, Protestant religions or any other religion has nothing
to do with Social Credit. We can usefully distinguish in this
Wally briefly comments re Victor Bridger's observations below and and
subsequent two messages:
I much appreciate your comments below re Social Credit and the policy
of a philosophy, etc. Some people seem so infected with the warm
fuzzies that they completely depart from the reality that not
Credit
Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 12:29 AM
Subject: Re: [SOCIAL CREDIT] Policy of a
Philosophy
The discussion between Keith Wilde, Chick Hurst,
Vince, Victor, and Bill Ryan, thread subject --
Policy
of a Philosophy, is not easy for me to fully
grasp
:
Blaming
Jews is one of mine. Disrespecting
President
Bush is another.
John
Gelles
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Social Credit
Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 3:09
PM
Subject: Re: [SOCIAL CREDIT] Policy of a
Philosophy
Thanks to Chick
stly Christian --
that's OK with me.
Most of my best friends are
Christian. Why?
Because there are so many of
them and so
few Jews
inAmerica.
- Original Message -
From: keith wilde
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 12:36 PM
Subject: [SOCIAL
that were active members of the party and the
movement.
Chick
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Social Credit
Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 12:29
AM
Subject: Re: [SOCIAL CREDIT] Policy of a
Philosophy
The discussion between Keith
Wilde
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 12:15 PM
Subject: Re: [SOCIAL CREDIT] Policy of a
Philosophy
I
like what John is saying and it ties in with what Bill Ryan is saying and I
agree, but perhaps a better term might be crutch.
These
side issues are distractions but when we
Chicks answer to Vinces question about Douglas flawed research material is straightforward and understandable to me, but I am less sure of what Bill has in mind with his addition. I will first suggest a possible interpretation, therefore, and then add a comment of my own about the flawed
You are right. But some people get so tied up in the distractions that they
overlook or don't have time for the real problem.
Chick
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 9:41 AM
Subject: RE: [SOCIAL CREDIT] Policy
I think my response to yours would be embodied in the following (rather
lengthy) posting to the SANE Network. Substantially I agree with the Pope
statement, but I do not see the philosophy is embodied in the organisation he
heads. The Pope and Cardinals, Bishops, etc is a political entity
-Masonic
Philosophy and Policy. All of which are incompatible with Social Credit.
Vince
From: Chick Hurst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SOCIAL CREDIT] Policy of a Philosophy
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 19:55:37 -0700
The topic of Social Credit being
: Jessop Sutton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 5:43 PM
Subject: Re: [SOCIAL CREDIT] Policy of a Philosophy
I go along with this statement by Douglas:-
It must be insisted that Christianity is either something inherent in the
very warp and woof
The topic of Social Credit being the policy of a Christian philosophy has
been mentioned in this discussion group. Comments were made regarding the
position of the Roman Catholic Church. I thought Id add a few quotes to put
more of perspective on the whole discussion.
It is an injustice, a
17 matches
Mail list logo
