FYI, I committed the Lucene patch that allows the *:* syntax today.
It will be available in Solr when we do another lucene sync-up.
-Yonik
: It would would be really cool is if you could say something like...
:
: field:[low TO high]^0 other clauses XXX^0
:
: ...and SolrIndexSearcher recognised that teh score contributions from the
: range query and the XXX TermQuery weren't going to contribute to the
: score, so it
Walter Underwood wrote:
I was thinking something similar, maybe _solr:all. At Infoseek, we
hardcoded url:http to match all docs.
I suppose that different data would yield different responses but a
space ( ) works on our data.
the other Walter
On 11/21/06 3:19 PM, Chris Hostetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: I've considered *:* but I haven't checked if the JavaCC grammar will
: allow that through or if it would need to be modified.
:
: I looked into it quick, and it looks like the grammar may need to be
: modified (i.e., one
On 11/21/06, Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way to do a match all docs query in solr?
I mean is there something I can put in a solr URL that will get
recognized by the SolrQueryParser as meaning a match all?
No, but there should be.
I've considered *:* but I haven't checked if the
Thanks for the quick response.
I thought about a range query on the ID, but was wondering what the
implications were for a large range query. (e.g. Number of docs
maxBooleanClauses). But this approach will work for me, as my test
indicies are generally small.
For a large data set, would it
Underwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006 6:24 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: MatchAllDocsQuery in solr?
On 11/21/06 3:19 PM, Chris Hostetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: I've considered *:* but I haven't checked if the JavaCC grammar will
: allow
Is there a way to do a match all docs query in solr?
Why do you need to perform full index search in order to find all indexed
documents?
We need additional XML-Admin-API, but it is different type of a 'query in
solr' - no need for analyzer, tokenizer, etc.
On 11/21/06, Yonik Seeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I looked into it quick, and it looks like the grammar may need to be
modified (i.e., one can't just override a method of QueryParser to do
this).
Done, but not yet committed in Lucene:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-723
-Yonik